>>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

[5 4 Fighting]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Hey 5 4 Crying, feast on this piece of NCAA censorship-deserving load of recruit oriented hogwash: https://twitter.com/#!/But_Greg_Said/status/162958509393186816 It's just dripping with deceit!!!

I don't know who this 5 4 bro is, but from his posts he's clearly making it sound like his daughter got snubbed by RIT on some recruiting trip and it's been one of the most life altering experiences of his life. Don't know if that's true, it's just the picture he's painted for me.

Twitter now?

Nope, not true and for the record...never went to RIT on a recruiting trip. Not even on the radar. RIT just never stacked up academically... as witnessed by some of the grads posting on this thread.

 

[StimulisRK]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Twitter now?

Nope, not true and for the record...never went to RIT on a recruiting trip. Not even on the radar. RIT just never stacked up academically... as witnessed by some of the grads posting on this thread.

Ok, it was just what your past post's imply. Curious though (and also a serious question), why do you spend so much time on this thread? What made RIT not "stack up academically" to you?

 

[OrangeBruin]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Twitter now?

Nope, not true and for the record...never went to RIT on a recruiting trip. Not even on the radar. RIT just never stacked up academically... as witnessed by some of the grads posting on this thread.

So what school did your kid end up in?

As far as RIT not stacking academically, it really depends on what the major is. The engineering and computing majors are quite good as are some of the photo and imaging majors. There are some majors that aren't as good but that happens at every school.

 

[brookyone]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

I was told that RIT is in fact applying to NCAA to move to division 1, the application needs to be in by sometime in the end of June to be considered for D1 play in the fall, and RIT is planning to send it in this week.

Hope it gets done and another D-I women's hockey program is added. More D-I programs = progress in the right direction with more opportunities for players hoping to play division I college hockey.

...and an expanded tournament someday.

 

[RIT Winters]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Ok, it was just what your past post's imply. Curious though (and also a serious question), why do you spend so much time on this thread? What made RIT not "stack up academically" to you?

Indeed. One has to have some reason for scorn in order to spend this much time slinging mud in another teams thread.

So, Mr.Fighting, why don't you enlighten us all as to why you hate RIT so much?

 

[5 4 Fighting]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Hope it gets done and another D-I women's hockey program is added. More D-I programs = progress in the right direction with more opportunities for players hoping to play division I college hockey.

...and an expanded tournament someday.

Agreed. Funny enough... I think that's what everybody wants, including the vast majority of the D3 community. Your a long time poster here Brook...you know no one pushes the NCAA on any issues but the longer they drag their feet on this issue...the more it puts RIT in bad light on it's recruiting front. Full stop.

I must say I knew the delay would be imminent...the minute I read a few years back that RIT was lawyering up.

 

[5 4 Fighting]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Indeed. One has to have some reason for scorn in order to spend this much time slinging mud in another teams thread.

So, Mr.Fighting, why don't you enlighten us all as to why you hate RIT so much?

Again...if you had have been following along.. "Hate is a strong word, I prefer lack of respect."

So...Mr. You and Stimulating are both Mens fans and seldom, if ever...have posted on the Women's thread.

Instead of me enlightening you why don't you and a few others take the time to read back through not only this thread but previous years RIT threads, educate yourselves on the topics at hand and then come back and we'll have a dance.

 

[mar7967]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Hope it gets done and another D-I women's hockey program is added. More D-I programs = progress in the right direction with more opportunities for players hoping to play division I college hockey.

...and an expanded tournament someday.

I have heard that there are 27 other schools applying to move a sport to D1 - I don't think they are all hockey though.

 

[Cali]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Agreed. Funny enough... I think that's what everybody wants, including the vast majority of the D3 community. Your a long time poster here Brook...you know no one pushes the NCAA on any issues but the longer they drag their feet on this issue...the more it puts RIT in bad light on it's recruiting front. Full stop.

I must say I knew the delay would be imminent...the minute I read a few years back that RIT was lawyering up.

Can I ask you a question with all do respect and sincerity? What recruiting issues do you continually refer to and are they factual or heresay? My D went through the process and everything that was shared with us was truthful and informative and was in no way deceitful or underhanded, and this goes back almost 2 years from our first introduction. Saying that, I don't know what "promises" were actually made before our time and I haven't spoken to anyone firsthand that also went through the process.

 

[5 4 Fighting]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Can I ask you a question with all do respect and sincerity? What recruiting issues do you continually refer to and are they factual or heresay? My D went through the process and everything that was shared with us was truthful and informative and was in no way deceitful or underhanded, and this goes back almost 2 years from our first introduction. Saying that, I don't know what "promises" were actually made before our time and I haven't spoken to anyone firsthand that also went through the process.

With all due respect Cali, lets cut to the chase....is your daughter going to RIT next year?

 

[Cali]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

With all due respect Cali, lets cut to the chase....is your daughter going to RIT next year?

Information gathering is always important is it not? Where did your daughter go?

 

[brookyone]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

With all due respect Cali, lets cut to the chase....is your daughter going to RIT next year?

How did that become the issue? Always a question to answer a question and never an answer.

 

[StimulisRK]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Again...if you had have been following along.. "Hate is a strong word, I prefer lack of respect."

So...Mr. You and Stimulating are both Mens fans and seldom, if ever...have posted on the Women's thread.

Instead of me enlightening you why don't you and a few others take the time to read back through not only this thread but previous years RIT threads, educate yourselves on the topics at hand and then come back and we'll have a dance.

No time broseph. Too busy spending time with RIT academics that don't - how should I put it - "stack up"??

It would actually be really helpful if you could just give us an answer and just skip the whole dancing thing you seem to have an affinity for. I don't dance dude. I'm a guy, I like snowboarding and cars - dancing, not so much. As my Golden Gopher friend stated so perfectly:

Always a question to answer a question and never an answer.

 

[CanHockGuy]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

How did that become the issue? Always a question to answer a question and never an answer.

Because if she is not attending RIT next year she was never likely in the D-1 fold. At least that's the way I'm picturing it.

 

[LaRondelle]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

RIT is deliberately not being up front about D1 based on how they are abandoning ECAC West teams for next year's schedule. Call the ECAC West commissioner or media rep and ask if they are playing a full league schedule next season. They are not.

 

[CanHockGuy]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Maybe Brokey would like to have a conversation with LaRondelle about the situation at hand, now that Brokey had a page of this thread removed. I'm sure though--that enough people saw what was posted this morning, and can form a proper (albeit shocked) opinion from what they read. People talk. Go get'm Brokey.

 

[brookyone]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

now that Brokey had a page of this thread removed.

Another genius, typically fact based statement from the Charlie McCarthy of USCHO.

 

[LtPowers]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Well, Elmira and Amherst did us some favors this week. Back on top! But we still need to sweep Elmira to host the ECAC West tourney.

Can someone remind me why the Elmira games are home-and-home? That means we get only one home game against Platty and Elmira combined this year.


Powers &8^]

 

[PrezdeJohnson09]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Well, Elmira and Amherst did us some favors this week. Back on top! But we still need to sweep Elmira to host the ECAC West tourney.

Can someone remind me why the Elmira games are home-and-home? That means we get only one home game against Platty and Elmira combined this year.


Powers &8^]

I believe its the final piece of the puzzle to RIT/Plattsburgh/Elmira getting off the rotation of each school hosting the other two one year and then going to the other two the next year.

Elmira went to Plattsburgh two years in a row for the league games the last two seasons. This past weekend was the first time Plattsburgh came to the domes since the 2008-09 season.

 

[CanHockGuy]

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Another genius, typically fact based statement from the Charlie McCarthy of USCHO.

Ok then genius. Care to explain the serious accusations put in front of you by 5-4 this morning? It clearly was factual. No one would make up that sort of thing, and you didn't care to defend your actions, you only tried to change the subject. You arranged to have the posts removed out of fear. You look guilty, and I believe anyone else that saw the posts this morning would agree. You need to get some help. Spare me any gutless reply. We have heard them all before. PS.....And don't forget my back pocket; it's all recorded.

RIT -- sorry for interrupting your thread.