What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

>>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

It's important to make a distinction between what happens in a professional or upper level amateur hockey game and what goes on (or should go on) in a men's C/D non check beer league at the local rink. There is a world of difference.

The fact of the matter is that there was NO EXCUSE for what Coach McDonald did. None. Everyone here seems to have their orange tinted sunglasses on when it comes to viewing this situation. He sucker punched a guy 100 feet away from the play in a freakin' beer league game because he felt the guy was cherry picking late in a blowout. Sure, I am sure they exchanged some words, maybe a slash or jab here or there, but there is NO EXCUSE for his actions. NONE. It is behavior that is completely unacceptable for someone in his position.

He is fortunate that the school tried to sweep this matter quickly under the rug, hoping that no one would notice or that the matter would quickly pass without the victim deciding to file criminal charges. A 1 game suspension, for a game against a team that quite frankly is probably the worst team in women's hockey was hardly sufficient punishment for these actions. AD Spiotti and President Destler had a chance to send a real message to the community about the standards and expectations RIT has of its coaches and student athletes and quite frankly they dropped the ball. You can bet your last dollar that if this was a student athlete involved in an altercation, he would have been suspended and punished in a much more severe fashion. Hell, players have gotten more of a punishment for curfew violations than what he got for ASSAULTING a person, and getting hauled out of an arena in handcuffs in a sheriff's car.

At a time when RIT is trying to make deeper in-roads to the community at large and grow the RIT brand and promote the RIT hockey program, trying to raise funds from the community for a new arena and on the verge of taking the Women's program to DI, this is not the type of attention the school needs and they in some was have become their own worst enemy with the joke of a punishment handed to Coach McDonald.

Completely agree, very convincing and unfortunate. It makes you question whether he might be out after this season or not be the head coach, it definitely could hurt future recruiting if he stays as head coach.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Everyone takes the media reports to be 100% true - you don't think they are spinning the story at all to make Coach McDonald look bad? I don't really think his future with RIT is in question at all.
 
Everyone takes the media reports to be 100% true - you don't think they are spinning the story at all to make Coach McDonald look bad? I don't really think his future with RIT is in question at all.

Not just discussing media reports. Discussing actually the accounts of those who witnessed the event and saw the damage inflicted on the victim.

If you don't think this incident puts his status going forward into question you really aren't looking at this matter objectively. Am I saying he's going to get fired over this, no, but would it surprise me if he did, not at all.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Not just discussing media reports. Discussing actually the accounts of those who witnessed the event and saw the damage inflicted on the victim.

If you don't think this incident puts his status going forward into question you really aren't looking at this matter objectively. Am I saying he's going to get fired over this, no, but would it surprise me if he did, not at all.

I have also heard from someone who witnessed it, and I believe it is being exaggerated into a news story.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

I have also heard from someone who witnessed it, and I believe it is being exaggerated into a news story.

Now that sounds reliable; the case cracker. :rolleyes: If a guy is taken away by the fuzz in bracelets, there might just be some cause for concern. Besides, retaliation to any degree in something like a cheesy beer league game is just plain irresponsible for a guy in his position. You can't have any witnesses to this sort of thing. ;)
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Not just discussing media reports. Discussing actually the accounts of those who witnessed the event and saw the damage inflicted on the victim.

Then you have the rest of us at a disadvantage.


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Hey, we got it done! Looked dicey there after the North Country weekend, but we're right where we wanted to be going into the playoffs. Winning the playoff title will be hard, and winning the NCAAs will be harder, but RIT has put themselves in the best possible position to do it.


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Hmm, Potsdam, huh? I guess we're now Oswego fans. =)


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Given our (pending, possibly, maybe) likely move to D1 next year, it would be ultra sweet to win the championship this year. That would put RIT well on its way to sweeping all possible Division level championships for hockey, both men's and women's.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Given our (pending, possibly, maybe) likely move to D1 next year

Regarding this, at the alumni reception in Niagara last week. Lou Spiotti mentioned that "We've just received word back from the CHA that we've been accepted as a member to their conference." Yet, he mentioned nothing around dates or conditions. I would have thought RIT would have been saving info like that for a "formal" announcement.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Regarding this, at the alumni reception in Niagara last week. Lou Spiotti mentioned that "We've just received word back from the CHA that we've been accepted as a member to their conference." Yet, he mentioned nothing around dates or conditions. I would have thought RIT would have been saving info like that for a "formal" announcement.

Yes. This is strange (and very "un-RIT-Like"). It makes some sense to put off an announcement until after the season is over to avoid the whole "last chance at DIII" story, but it is strange to let little bits of the story, assuming there is one, out at various events. One can only assume there is going to be some big formal announcement after the playoffs. After all, the mens final DIII season was not a thing of beauty after the DI announcement.

Regardless, all the best to the lady tigers in the playoffs.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

Given our (pending, possibly, maybe) likely move to D1 next year, it would be ultra sweet to win the championship this year. That would put RIT well on its way to sweeping all possible Division level championships for hockey, both men's and women's.

Getting a little ahead of yourself ?.

While you may have a good shot at D3, odds of that happening and then winning D1 in upcoming years are fairly slim. Not a single team from the East has ever won D1 in women's hockey.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

and RIT is far from winning anything just yet this year.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

and RIT is far from winning anything just yet this year.

yeah well those who want to dismiss RIT will have a different opinion at the end of the weekend - at home, ferocious talent, lots to prove and win for, a lot of penalty minutes however but they can beat anyone with ease when they want to.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

yeah well those who want to dismiss RIT will have a different opinion at the end of the weekend - at home, ferocious talent, lots to prove and win for, a lot of penalty minutes however but they can beat anyone with ease when they want to.

No one is dismissing them, however, they cannot beat everyone with ease....not at least teams in the top 10....and as long as Chamberlin plays well, they have as good a chance to win as anyone, but if she has an off game, they are a very beatable team. Let's see how they do over the next few weekends before you crown them, remember you do still have to play the games to win the championship.;)
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

On paper RIT is the favorite to win, however there are four other teams that if they won I wouldn't be surprised. Those teams being Plattsburgh, Norwich, Amherst, and Middlebury. If Elmira somehow made it in I wouldn't surprised if they won, frustrated yes but not surprised.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

On paper RIT is the favorite to win, however there are four other teams that if they won I wouldn't be surprised. Those teams being Plattsburgh, Norwich, Amherst, and Middlebury. If Elmira somehow made it in I wouldn't surprised if they won, frustrated yes but not surprised.

I'd throw Gustavus Adolphus and River Falls into the "not surprised" list as well. Granted it would be the first time a Western team won if one of those two won but I don't think I would say it would SHOCK me if either of them won with the right bounce of the puck.

Anyone outside of those 8 though would certainly shock me and the rest of the world I would think.
 
Last edited:
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

yeah well those who want to dismiss RIT will have a different opinion at the end of the weekend - at home, ferocious talent, lots to prove and win for, a lot of penalty minutes however but they can beat anyone with ease when they want to.

potsdam is so highly motivated to continue winning they are going to battle their way into a championship game on sunday. right behind them (or ahead maybe) is oswego that is a scary match for both psu and rit or anyone else. the giants lost to sf and green bay in the nfl regular season and won the super bowl. oswego could be this years giants in the ecac west
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

I'd throw Gustavus Adolphus and River Falls into the "not surprised" list as well. Granted it would be the first time a Western team one if one of those two won but I don't think I would say it would SHOCK me if either of them won with the right bounce of the puck.

Anyone outside of those 8 though would certainly shock me and the rest of the world I would think.

I purposefully left the west out since no team has one for so long so it would be kind of surprising. Due but surprising.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<

potsdam is so highly motivated to continue winning they are going to battle their way into a championship game on sunday. right behind them (or ahead maybe) is oswego that is a scary match for both psu and rit or anyone else. the giants lost to sf and green bay in the nfl regular season and won the super bowl. oswego could be this years giants in the ecac west

If this happens I'm punching babies and punting kittens. I didn't need to be reminded of that.
 
Back
Top