Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 -- Now then, where were we? <<<
Chris,
As a longtime supporter of both teams you've failed to mention that when the men's team was moved up to D1, they certainly were not a high caliber D3 team and were struggling to get out of their own conference let alone be NCAA contenders. Different story for the women as they are proving again that they are going to be a contender in March.
Now I'm not saying there won't be players cut but these players have played and experienced games that their male counter parts never came close to experiencing during their transition out of D3.
As far as I know, the official position on this continues to be: "Not a matter of if we are going D-I but when." When is still TDB.
And just because a team goes D-I, it does not mean it will keep all of its players. The men's team cut 4-5 players from the returning roster when it went D-I and probably kept a few seniors who were over their heads around out of loyalty and because it was a transition year. The team that won the AHA regular season title two years into the move was made up of less than half of the former D-III players, while that freshman class were seniors when the team went to the Frozen Four. A vast change in talent.
Chris,
As a longtime supporter of both teams you've failed to mention that when the men's team was moved up to D1, they certainly were not a high caliber D3 team and were struggling to get out of their own conference let alone be NCAA contenders. Different story for the women as they are proving again that they are going to be a contender in March.
Now I'm not saying there won't be players cut but these players have played and experienced games that their male counter parts never came close to experiencing during their transition out of D3.