What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

My high school had 200ish kids, with one guidance counselor. I actually feel like we could have used another one. Maybe that's cause the one we did have wasn't too committed to her job, but whatever.
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

In my kids school system, start with 3 guidance counselors and 1 asst counselor. Then look at 16 ed techs. The school has 350 kids. Then look at the administration, way too many folks in the office pushing paper to nowhere.

Then there's tenure, which is basically institutionalized waste. The list goes on and on.
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

If someone could model the NY City education system of the 20's and 30's, I'd go for that.

Rover, I'd cut as much overhead as possible especially in the central offices - and what do we need the Federal Dept of Ed for anyway? Shouldn't the states decide what is best for their kids?? After all, all politics is local.....
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

Rover, I'd cut as much overhead as possible especially in the central offices - and what do we need the Federal Dept of Ed for anyway? Shouldn't the states decide what is best for their kids?? After all, all politics is local.....
Can't do that because then schools in some states won't teach evolution and will opt for intelligent design or that people are descendants from tomatoes.
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

If someone could model the NY City education system of the 20's and 30's, I'd go for that.

Rover, I'd cut as much overhead as possible especially in the central offices - and what do we need the Federal Dept of Ed for anyway? Shouldn't the states decide what is best for their kids?? After all, all politics is local.....

Don't have a problem with cutting central office admin overhead, but that's not teachers' unions.

I wouldn't abolish the Dept of Education for the simple reason that somebody has to set some standards. How many school districts are there in this country? If some want to ban evolution for example and use public school as a religious platform, you can't allow that. Similarly, if someone wants to teach Ebonics as an acceptable language course, you can't allow that to count towards a high school diploma either. That's why I always laugh about the complaining about standardized tests. How else are you going to measure people on an even keel? Seems the people who complain about them are the ones too stupid to score well on them. I've got news for those people; you're tested often in the working world against peers so you may as well get used to it. To that end, some entity has to set those standards, which of course may evolve over time.
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

Don't have a problem with cutting central office admin overhead, but that's not teachers' unions.

I wouldn't abolish the Dept of Education for the simple reason that somebody has to set some standards. How many school districts are there in this country? If some want to ban evolution for example and use public school as a religious platform, you can't allow that. Similarly, if someone wants to teach Ebonics as an acceptable language course, you can't allow that to count towards a high school diploma either. That's why I always laugh about the complaining about standardized tests. How else are you going to measure people on an even keel? Seems the people who complain about them are the ones too stupid to score well on them. I've got news for those people; you're tested often in the working world against peers so you may as well get used to it. To that end, some entity has to set those standards, which of course may evolve over time.

I disagree.

Abolish it. Create true competition among the states. If some of these states want to teach Ebonics and Intelligent Design let them.
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

I disagree.

Abolish it. Create true competition among the states. If some of these states want to teach Ebonics and Intelligent Design let them.
Exactly, that was the whole point of the american experiment. Let the states compete, see what works best and let other states duplicate things. Its why open enrollment and vouchers are a good idea to help force the underperforming schools to improve to keep their enrollment.
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

Don't have a problem with cutting central office admin overhead, but that's not teachers' unions.

I wouldn't abolish the Dept of Education for the simple reason that somebody has to set some standards. How many school districts are there in this country? If some want to ban evolution for example and use public school as a religious platform, you can't allow that. Similarly, if someone wants to teach Ebonics as an acceptable language course, you can't allow that to count towards a high school diploma either. That's why I always laugh about the complaining about standardized tests. How else are you going to measure people on an even keel? Seems the people who complain about them are the ones too stupid to score well on them. I've got news for those people; you're tested often in the working world against peers so you may as well get used to it. To that end, some entity has to set those standards, which of course may evolve over time.
Nonsense. You don't have to have a Dept of Education to ensure that states/school districts don't use public schools to foist religious beliefs on students - that's what the first amendment and courts are for.

I'm all for standardized testing (and tend to agree with you about those who complain about them), but seems that ETS, Standford et. al. had been doing a fine job long before the Dept of Ed was created.
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

Exactly, that was the whole point of the american experiment. Let the states compete, see what works best and let other states duplicate things. Its why open enrollment and vouchers are a good idea to help force the underperforming schools to improve to keep their enrollment.

We made it for two centuries without a dept. of education and for the life of me I can't remember the rationale for establishing one (seriously). Education has traditionally been a state function and we've been doing pretty well on that score. Although I must confess to being sympathetic to the ebonics/creationism arguments. Still, are those really a federal matters?

George Will: We get into trouble in this country by wanting every good idea to be a federal program and every bad idea to be a federal law. It's called the United STATES of America for a reason. And I think the states are generallly quite capable of setting standards and seeing to it the students meet those standards.
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

OK... for the defenders of the department of education.... in your own words

what does the department of education do? what purpose does it currently serve?
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

Don't have a problem with cutting central office admin overhead, but that's not teachers' unions.

I wouldn't abolish the Dept of Education for the simple reason that somebody has to set some standards. How many school districts are there in this country? If some want to ban evolution for example and use public school as a religious platform, you can't allow that. Similarly, if someone wants to teach Ebonics as an acceptable language course, you can't allow that to count towards a high school diploma either. That's why I always laugh about the complaining about standardized tests. How else are you going to measure people on an even keel? Seems the people who complain about them are the ones too stupid to score well on them. I've got news for those people; you're tested often in the working world against peers so you may as well get used to it. To that end, some entity has to set those standards, which of course may evolve over time.

Ummm...I passed all the standardized tests quite easily when in school, I am going to be a teacher, and THEY SUCK! You cannot break down education like that things get lost in the shuffle. That is why the Civil War and WWII are always discussed at length but the War of 1812, The Spanish-American War, WWI and Korea are largely ignored.

Teachers only teach to the questions on the test and that is unacceptable. But feel free to ignore what teachers say on the subject since almost none of them think it is a good idea...obviously you know better :rolleyes:
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

Getting off the education talk for a bit...does anyone else find it disturbing that so many states are taking issue with Mosques being built? Leaving out the Ground Zero issue for the purposes of this discussion, the fact is many communities are really up in arms over this. Doesn't that seem a bit un-American? I mean we can have churches on every block but not mosques?

I am not going to get into an ecumenical argument about it because that isn't the point. It seems rather ridiculous that a country that values "Freedom of Religion" seems to be against said freedom for muslims and that it appears to be many "conservatives" that are trumpeting the call. (though to be fair California is making a stink about it too and they are a bunch of granola eating hippies!) IMHO anyone who goes about trying to stop muslims from practicing or congregating (and they are if they are trying to stop the building of mosques or allowing them in their neighborhoods) is pretty much spitting on the Constitution and violating their civil rights.

What does everyone else think. (and like I said I am not discussing the Ground Zero Mosque which is its own argument)
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

Getting off the education talk for a bit...does anyone else find it disturbing that so many states are taking issue with Mosques being built? Leaving out the Ground Zero issue for the purposes of this discussion, the fact is many communities are really up in arms over this. Doesn't that seem a bit un-American? I mean we can have churches on every block but not mosques?

I am not going to get into an ecumenical argument about it because that isn't the point. It seems rather ridiculous that a country that values "Freedom of Religion" seems to be against said freedom for muslims and that it appears to be many "conservatives" that are trumpeting the call. (though to be fair California is making a stink about it too and they are a bunch of granola eating hippies!) IMHO anyone who goes about trying to stop muslims from practicing or congregating (and they are if they are trying to stop the building of mosques or allowing them in their neighborhoods) is pretty much spitting on the Constitution and violating their civil rights.

What does everyone else think. (and like I said I am not discussing the Ground Zero Mosque which is its own argument)
Agree 100%.

Last November, Switzerland had a national referendum on the ballot to ban construction of minarets (not mosques, just minarets), which passed with 58% of the vote (the 4 minarets already in Switzerland are grandfathered). The whole process absolutely turned my stomach - the poster campaign in favor of the ban was xenophobic at best and outright racist at the worst. (see wiki link.)

I'd like to think that such a thing could never happen in the US - I'm a bit out of touch with the controversies you're referencing in the US. Do you have links to specific instances where construction of a mosque is being rejected?
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

Getting off the education talk for a bit...does anyone else find it disturbing that so many states are taking issue with Mosques being built? Leaving out the Ground Zero issue for the purposes of this discussion, the fact is many communities are really up in arms over this. Doesn't that seem a bit un-American? I mean we can have churches on every block but not mosques?

I am not going to get into an ecumenical argument about it because that isn't the point. It seems rather ridiculous that a country that values "Freedom of Religion" seems to be against said freedom for muslims and that it appears to be many "conservatives" that are trumpeting the call. (though to be fair California is making a stink about it too and they are a bunch of granola eating hippies!) IMHO anyone who goes about trying to stop muslims from practicing or congregating (and they are if they are trying to stop the building of mosques or allowing them in their neighborhoods) is pretty much spitting on the Constitution and violating their civil rights.

What does everyone else think. (and like I said I am not discussing the Ground Zero Mosque which is its own argument)

Well, I see your point. But consider the fact that there are over 2,000 mosques already in the country. Hard to make the point of religious intolerance under those circumstances, especially when there are zero churches in Saudi Arabia.

Still, even the perception or a hint of religious intolerance is antithetical to the American tradition. We've tolerated cults and whack job religious extremists from day one. What's different about Islam? Now?

That's a question that answers itself. It started with the revolution in Iran, continued through 9/11, and the horror of a United States Army doctor slaughtering 13 GI's in the name of Allah, and the various plots that seem to be discovered nearly every week. And ends in the monstrously triumphal and inappropriate mosque at GZ. Assuming this monument to the "accomplishments" of 9/11 is built, I think Gutman's got a good idea, putting a gay bar right next door. Tends to call the bluff of those double dealing liars. I know you said to exclude the GZ mosque from this disucssion but it's hard to do. CNN released a poll today showing 68% of Americans (including a majority of Democrats) oppose this abomination.

I don't believe a thing the instigators of this mosque say. They remind me of Yasser Arafat, who was always making calls for peace in his English language speeches and calling for Israel to be turned into a cinder in his Arabic speeches. And given their track record, I'm also suspicious of the funding.

But getting back to your point, I agree, I was a little surprised and concerned the other day when I read a piece about the various communities that are resisting new mosques. I believe America was fat, dumb, happy and tolerant of Islam before 9/11Subsequent events have caused many to question whether we should re-examine that tolerance. But when some Americans are afraid, they sometimes do horrible things. I'm thinking of those three young brothers (in Florida?) in the early days of the AIDS epidemic who were burned out of their house, presumably by neighbors. Fear can make people do regrettable things.

We know that some (but certainly not all) mosques have been and continue to be centers of terrorist planning and jihadi indoctrination. We know that some (but certainly not all) Muslims wish to defeat us and to impose Sharia law. The trouble is, we don't always know which is which. And this uncertainty has led some (but certainly not all) of us to become very suspicious of Muslims in general and to backtrack from our traditional position of tolerating just about anything in the name of "freedom of religion."

And Americans understand when they're being handed a line of crap--like when the Attorney General, testifying under oath before congress, was unable to utter the words "Muslim" or "terrorist." We may be ignorant but we're not stupid.

It's a tough time in America, on a lot of fronts, but the one thing that hasn't happened is the "backlash" against Muslims widely predicted in the wake of 9/11. We are conducting a war against Islamofacism and must be prepared to fight it within our own borders. At the same time, we shouldn't abandon the pluralist instincts that have served us so well for so long.
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

.

Teachers only teach to the questions on the test and that is unacceptable.
When the kid was in 6th or 7th grade they spent 2 to 3 weeks practicing for the " test"(MEAs).
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

. Similarly, if someone wants to teach Ebonics as an acceptable language course, you can't allow that to count towards a high school diploma either..

Yet it would count at the college level
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

CNN released a poll today showing 68% of Americans (including a majority of Democrats) oppose this abomination.

How many people who actually live in New York City oppose the building of the mosque? Also, whole argument of the thing is framed so stupidly. The mosque is 2 or 3 blocks away from ground zero, there is essentially only one other major mosque in Manhattan that from what I understand is very overcrowded during prayer time so the need is there. And then there is the fact that trying to stop it is completely unconstitutional. Mayor Bloomberg said it very well:

Whatever you may think of the proposed mosque and community center, lost in the heat of the debate has been a basic question: Should government attempt to deny private citizens the right to build a house of worship on private property based on their particular religion? That may happen in other countries, but we should never allow it to happen here.

“This nation was founded on the principle that the government must never choose between religions or favor one over another. The World Trade Center site will forever hold a special place in our city, in our hearts. But we would be untrue to the best part of ourselves and who we are as New Yorkers and Americans if we said no to a mosque in lower Manhattan.

“Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11, and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would betray our values and play into our enemies' hands if we were to treat Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists, and we should not stand for that.

"For that reason, I believe that this is an important test of the separation of church and state as we may see in our lifetimes, as important a test. And it is critically important that we get it right.

Also, I, who actually live in Manhattan fully support the building of the mosque there.
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

That is why the Civil War and WWII are always discussed at length but the War of 1812, The Spanish-American War, WWI and Korea are largely ignored.

Of course, in fairness, WWII and the Civil War were actually much bigger wars from an American perspective than any of the other ones you mentioned. Those two, along with the revolutionary war, were always covered in more detail than any other war, even before teachers taught to the test.
 
Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2

I disagree.

Abolish it. Create true competition among the states. If some of these states want to teach Ebonics and Intelligent Design let them.

Absolutely not. Every kid in this country deserves to be educated up to some minimum standard. That's not to say they will all take advantage of that, but if you're unlucky enough to be born in a place where Ebonics is considered a proper language you should not be educated in it for 12 years of wasted time that you can't get back, only to find out once you leave school that you've been following the curriculum of idiots.

Walrus, it doesn't surprise me UMaine gives college credits for Ebonics classes. My only question is does that only apply to hockey players or the entire student population? :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top