What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

D-III Women's Bracketology

As I just said, either way you probably end up with two flights. It's either 1 flight in the first round and 1 for the finals or two for the finals. I'd prefer two for the finals. 😜.

I still think it's all moot anyway and Adrian's staying home

I have to agree. Hard to believe Adrian gets in over Middlebury
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

Look for Adrian as the eighth team and probably playing Elmira in the first round.

Does that mean Trinity flies out to play Wisconsin-River Falls? Should Adrian be in and play at Elmira it leaves Plattsburgh, Norwich and Trinity in the East? I find it hard to believe there will be 2 NCHA schools rather than 2 NESCAC schools!!!
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

Does that mean Trinity flies out to play Wisconsin-River Falls? Should Adrian be in and play at Elmira it leaves Plattsburgh, Norwich and Trinity in the East? I find it hard to believe there will be 2 NCHA schools rather than 2 NESCAC schools!!!

Because of your overvalue of the NESCAC? :) It would make a strong case for my argument that the NESCAC isn't really that strong if Adrian gets in...and boy would that drive that one crazy person(Crosscheck) even crazier.

Like I've said...if Adrian is in and goes to Elmira that most likely means that St. Thomas is flying to Plattsburgh. St. Thomas is the only team in the tourney that has never been ranked, so you'd have to imagine that they are the overall 8th seed.
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

Because of your overvalue of the NESCAC? :) It would make a strong case for my argument that the NESCAC isn't really that strong if Adrian gets in...and boy would that drive that one crazy person(Crosscheck) even crazier.

Like I've said...if Adrian is in and goes to Elmira that most likely means that St. Thomas is flying to Plattsburgh. St. Thomas is the only team in the tourney that has never been ranked, so you'd have to imagine that they are the overall 8th seed.

You honestly think the NCHA plays hockey on the same level as the NESCAC? I mean I admit to a bias based on something like 50 or so games I attend a season. Top to bottom the NESCAC is the most competitive conference. So, you have watched a lot of NCHA action and my impression of the NESCAC is biased and incorrect? Or is this your bias based on living west of Pennsylvania?
 
Who would be the highest seed between platty and elmira?

Winning Percentage: Elmira (.907 v .889)
SOS: I'm assuming Plattsburgh (Going into this week .570 v .568)
Ranked Opponents: Elmira (.688 v .625)
Common Opponents: Elmira (.977 v .976) ...but it's pretty much tied.
Head-to-Head: Tied 2-2
Last 25%: Plattsburgh (1.000 vs .857)

Let's be honest, these two teams have virtually identical schedules, and results, amd the criteria shows it. Elmira has the .001 advantage in common opponents because they played 2 against Middlebury to Plattsburgh's 1 (both are X-0-1 against common opponents).

In fact, the biggest gaps in criteria (.018 in WIN, .063 in RNK, and .143 in L25) are the result of 2 games: Plattsburgh's tie to Gustavus Adolphus, and the ECAC-W title game.

Realistically, the committee could justify giving the #1 seed to either team. I think they will weight SOS (however slim a margin it is) and Last 25% slightly higher, goving Plattsburgh the #1 seed... But I would have no objections to the comparison going Elmira's way, either.
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

You honestly think the NCHA plays hockey on the same level as the NESCAC? I mean I admit to a bias based on something like 50 or so games I attend a season. Top to bottom the NESCAC is the most competitive conference. So, you have watched a lot of NCHA action and my impression of the NESCAC is biased and incorrect? Or is this your bias based on living west of Pennsylvania?

I'm not gonna rehash the argument. However, I've never understood the "its the most competitive conference top to bottom" argument. That just means that the teams are all really competivite with each other...it doesn't mean they're the best (which is why Platt, Elmira, Norwich were 5-1-1 vs the NESCAC) I'm just saying that its not far fetched that there are two equally good, as deserving teams in the NCHA as there are in the NESCAC. Remember how "being the most competitive conference top to bottom" fared for the NESCAC last year.

We both agree that if Middlebury and Adrian had won, that neither conference, most likely, would have had 2 teams in the tournament

And if you want to talk toughest conference top to bottom...WIAC
 
Last edited:
We both agree that if Middlebury and Adrian had won, that neither conference, most likely, would have had 2 teams in the tournament

And if you want to talk toughest conference top to bottom...WIAC

Plus the obvious - if either had won their tourney, they wouldn't be in this spot!

As for the WIAC, they don't have enough teams to have a bottom so the comparison to other full conferences is apples to oranges.
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

It's 10:00... What's the over/under on how late this thing gets started?

It's official - 5/3 split and St Thomas to Plattsburgh.

Hmmmm..... really struggling with Middlebury getting a home game against Norwich.....after losing to Trinity in the final at home. And I'm a NESCAC supporter. Only saving grace is that Norwich is so close they may have more fans than Middlebury anyway.
 
Last edited:
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

It's official - 5/3 split and St Thomas to Plattsburgh.

Hmmmm..... really struggling with Middlebury getting a home game against Norwich.....after losing to Trinity in the final at home. And I'm a NESCAC supporter.

Midd's head to head win must have been trump card.
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

It's official - 5/3 split and St Thomas to Plattsburgh.

Hmmmm..... really struggling with Middlebury getting a home game against Norwich.....after losing to Trinity in the final at home. And I'm a NESCAC supporter. Only saving grace is that Norwich is so close they may have more fans than Middlebury anyway.

Think whole body of work. The NCAA doesn't weight the loss to Trinity any heavier than any other game. Therefore, straight up, I don't think there was any doubt Middlebury would be ranked above Norwich.

Seeding was pretty easy to figure out:

1. Plattsburgh
2. Elmira
3. UW River Falls
4. Middlebury
5. Norwich
6. Trinity
7. Lake Forest
8. St. Thomas

My only surprise was that they moved Lake Forest ahead of St. Thomas. Maybe the boys on "the other site" will explain it to us.
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

Think whole body of work. The NCAA doesn't weight the loss to Trinity any heavier than any other game. Therefore, straight up, I don't think there was any doubt Middlebury would be ranked above Norwich.

Seeding was pretty easy to figure out:

1. Plattsburgh
2. Elmira
3. UW River Falls
4. Middlebury
5. Norwich
6. Trinity
7. Lake Forest
8. St. Thomas

My only surprise was that they moved Lake Forest ahead of St. Thomas. Maybe the boys on "the other site" will explain it to us.

Agreed on the seeding comment. This was probably the shortest meeting of the committee when it came to selecting the at-large. When #1 and #3 ranked teams lose in the 2 strongest conferences, they are going to move on with the records and SOS they have.
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

Agreed on the seeding comment. This was probably the shortest meeting of the committee when it came to selecting the at-large. When #1 and #3 ranked teams lose in the 2 strongest conferences, they are going to move on with the records and SOS they have.

I think the toughest question they had was Plttsburgh or Elmira for the #1 overall. It appears they went with Plattsburgh, probably because of the ever-so-slightly higher SOS and the Last 25% (which was the one criterion that wasn't essentially deadlocked).
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

So, the Plattsburgh men have a home Quarterfinal on 3/21... The same date & time as the Women's National Championship game. What happens? Who moves?
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

So, the Plattsburgh men have a home Quarterfinal on 3/21... The same date & time as the Women's National Championship game. What happens? Who moves?

Guess? Men's QF. Imagine the PR nightmare in moving a women's Final Four to accommodate a Men's QF game? I'm sure Plattsburgh and the NCAA will make that work....provided the women take care of business on Saturday...
 
Re: D-III Women's Bracketology

I think the toughest question they had was Plttsburgh or Elmira for the #1 overall. It appears they went with Plattsburgh, probably because of the ever-so-slightly higher SOS and the Last 25% (which was the one criterion that wasn't essentially deadlocked).

I think the toughest question went to the Western Committee: Adrian #1 or UW River Falls #1 in the final ranking? I haven't looked at the numbers to see how close it was before this weekend's games.
 
Back
Top