2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

[Priceless]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Not what I'm talking about. How many times have we heard that she'd be absent in the media were it not for the great liberal conspiracy, despite the fact she herself ran as VP, exposed herself during the campaign, quit her job, participated voluntarily in a reality cable TV show, went on FOX News ad naseum, joined the GOP trumpet circuit without any declaration of an actual campaign.....

She did all those things to prove how the lamestream media invades her privacy.

 

[Old Pio]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

She did all those things to prove how the lamestream media invades her privacy.

It's not a matter of "invading her privacy" Peeless, and you know it. None of these "crimes" is actually illegal. She's free to chart whatever course she wants for her life, n'est ce pas? And that may or may not include a run for the Republican presidential nomination. The issue is not the increased attention because of her political potential, it is the nature of that attention. Only libtards have made the alternative argument in this discussion. Oh yes, YOU'RE a libtard, aren't you? Thus speaketh another one!

 

[unofan]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

It's not a matter of "invading her privacy" Peeless, and you know it. None of these "crimes" is actually illegal. She's free to chart whatever course she wants for her life, n'est ce pas?

And are we free to call her out on her bullshiat (and that of her family), or does the first amendment only apply to her and you?

note: I'm sure the Parise reference sends a tingle up libtard legs, but I don't get it. And don't care.

You're on a college hockey board and you don't know the Parise reference? The odds of you being a paid troll just jumped dramatically.

 

[Slap Shot]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

So your standard for politics is the absence of persecution or crucifiction. Anything else is okay. Nixon would be pleased. Thus speaketh yet ANOTHER libtard.

Again, hyperbole at its finest. The one fact that you continually and conveniently ignore is that she is not some anti-social waif hiding from the media spotlight, but rather an agenda driven narcissist that put herself out there day after day and unbeknownst to herself came off as a mental midget. Every unfair accusation you crow about doesn't deter from the fact she was a train wreck that never stopped herself from being available to the masses. For that no is to blame but Palin and her handlers. You can cry wolf over and over until the cows come home, but no one is buying what you are selling.

And of course, score one for the previous Pavlov characterization.

 

[Bakunin]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

not what i'm talking about. How many times have we heard that she'd be absent in the media were it not for the great liberal conspiracy, despite the fact she herself ran as vp, exposed herself during the campaign.....

I don't remember her doing this.

 

[Slap Shot]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

I don't remember her doing this.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Bakunin again.

(it surely would have been green )

 

[Old Pio]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

And are we free to call her out on her bullshiat (and that of her family), or does the first amendment only apply to her and you?



You're on a college hockey board and you don't know the Parise reference? The odds of you being a paid troll just jumped dramatically.

"Paid troll?" You give new meaning to paranoia. Her family members aren't public figures, but that doesn't stop you mean spirited libtards, does it? Yeah, if Sarah Palin, or anybody conservative for that matter, doesn't like souless, gutter commentary about her family, all she has to do is "shut up" right? And you don't hate her, but if you did, she'd deserve it. Right? Do you have any idea how montrously stupid all of that is? And the only time I've ever suggested anyone's First Amendment rights be limited came right before your last nocturnal emission.

It's libtards who want to circumscribe the First Amendment rights of conservatives, not the other way 'round.

 

[Old Pio]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Again, hyperbole at its finest. The one fact that you continually and conveniently ignore is that she is not some anti-social waif hiding from the media spotlight, but rather an agenda driven narcissist that put herself out there day after day and unbeknownst to herself came off as a mental midget. Every unfair accusation you crow about doesn't deter from the fact she was a train wreck that never stopped herself from being available to the masses. For that no is to blame but Palin and her handlers. You can cry wolf over and over until the cows come home, but no one is buying what you are selling.

And of course, score one for the previous Pavlov characterization.

Two wrongs DO make a right and the ends DO justify the means. Got it. All she has to do is "shut up." You and that ambulance chaser must be channeling one another. Let's agree that everything you say about her is true. How does that justify blaming her for mass murder? Or attacking her kids in the lowest, most foul manner? Honestly, you libtards have lost any mooring to rationality and fairness you ever had.

How many times do you have to use "hyperbole" before you can move on to the next "Big Word of the Day?"

 

[WetSubArticCanine]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

She did all those things to prove how the lamestream media invades her privacy.

http://www.kansascity.com/2011/01/03/2557081/lee-judge-cartoon-archive.html#slide-61

 

[Slap Shot]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Two wrongs DO make a right and the ends DO justify the means.

Is there a political language translator on the net in which you copy and paste responses before deciding to respond? Otherwise there's no explanation for your inexplicably juvenile interpretation of what people actually post. I've never justified any specific accusations about her but rather I have laughed at the notion she's completely innocent and above the fray.

Ding!

How many times do you have to use "hyperbole" before you can move on to the next "Big Word of the Day?"

Should we search how many times you've tossed around, "libtard" for comparison? Surely you were the inspiration for Burt Lahr's most famous role.

 

[Old Pio]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Is there a political language translator on the net in which you copy and paste responses before deciding to respond? Otherwise there's no explanation for your inexplicably juvenile interpretation of what people actually post. I've never justified any specific accusations about her but rather I have laughed at the notion she's completely innocent and above the fray.

Ding!

You think the things said about Palin are fair commentary and I don't. And if you haven't disagreed with me about that commentary, you've managed to hide it in the margins.Your premise seems to be if she were a "better person" she wouldn't have to worry about these attacks. It's her fault, not the fault of Andrew Sullivan and Garofolo and Wonkette and the rest of the lynch mob

As far as "libtard" is concerned, you got me there. But it's been my experience you guys can dish it out pretty good, but you can't take it. Like Neville Brand says in "DOA," "soft in the belly."

 

[Slap Shot]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Yeah, no doubt about it, Clarence, I just can't keep up with your towering intellect. You think the things said about Palin are fair commentary and I don't. Take that "political language translator" of yours and stick it where the sun don't shine.

Your translator has failed you again. What I have actually said is that she's not hiding from the spotlight and with that often comes commentary that isn't always fair.

As far as "libtard" is concerned, it's been my experience you guys can dish it out pretty good, but you can't take it. Like Neville Brand says in "DOA," "soft in the belly."

"You guys". Grow up already.

Ding!

 

[Old Pio]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Your translator has failed you again. What I have actually said is that she's not hiding from the spotlight and with that often comes commentary that isn't always fair.



"You guys". Grow up already.

Ding!

It's hard to argue with someone who denies or can't remember what he posted. You have never, until this last post, hinted that you thought any of the comments about her have been unfair. Make up your mind, please. And though I may be juvenile, I don't accompany my posts with sound effects. Is that like a secret libtard handshake?

 

[Slap Shot]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

It's hard to argue with someone who denies or can't remember what he posted.

While I find it impossible to "argue" with someone that fails to actually take the time to read what another poster actually wrote. And sorry if the sound effects went over your head. Pavlov again is so proud.

 

[Old Pio]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

While I find it impossible to "argue" with someone that fails to actually take the time to read what another poster actually wrote. And sorry if the sound effects went over your head. Pavlov again is so proud.

OMG, an intelekchual. I'm in way over my head. But maybe you could climb down from the mountain top and refer to the post where you said the commentary against Palin was "unfair." You can't because you didn't. "I've never justified any specific allegations against her" strikes me as Clintonian, and not exactly the same as saying those allegations were unfair and over the line.

As far as "you guys" is concerned, seems like I've been getting it from an angry mob of libtards for the better part of a day now. I can take it, I assure you, but the phrase refers to the conistent nature and blind fury of those who disagree with me. So far, none of you has suggested MY First Amendment rights be limited, for which I am grateful.

 

[Foxton]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

OMG, an intelekchual. I'm in way over my head.

Yes

But maybe you could climb down from the mountain top and refer to the post where you said the commentary against Palin was "unfair." You can't because you didn't. "I've never justified any specific allegations against her" strikes me as Clintonian, and not exactly the same as saying those allegations were unfair and over the line.

As you've suggested before, anytime someone doesn't immediately decry something they support and promote it.

As far as "you guys" is concerned, seems like I've been getting it from an angry mob of libtards for the better part of a day now. I can take it, I assure you,

I don't think you can, that's why you're so defensive.

but the phrase refers to the conistent nature and blind fury of those who disagree with me.

Only blind because you cannot read.

So far, none of you has suggested MY First Amendment rights be limited, for which I am grateful.

This is not america, this is a website on the internet, you have no first amendment rights.

 

[Old Pio]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Yes

As you've suggested before, anytime someone doesn't immediately decry something they support and promote it.

I don't think you can, that's why you're so defensive.
Only blind because you cannot read.
This is not america, this is a website on the internet, you have no first amendment rights.

Pure poetry.

 

[bronconick]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

I'll be glad when we're finally close enough to Iowa and New Hampshire that we can concentrate on the people actually running. And that's knowing that the next year will have political ads non stop as both sides blow 1.5 billion each or some other absurd number.

 

[unofan]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

"Paid troll?" You give new meaning to paranoia. Her family members aren't public figures, but that doesn't stop you mean spirited libtards, does it? Yeah, if Sarah Palin, or anybody conservative for that matter, doesn't like souless, gutter commentary about her family, all she has to do is "shut up" right? And you don't hate her, but if you did, she'd deserve it. Right? Do you have any idea how montrously stupid all of that is? And the only time I've ever suggested anyone's First Amendment rights be limited came right before your last nocturnal emission.

It's libtards who want to circumscribe the First Amendment rights of conservatives, not the other way 'round.

Way to not respond to either question in the post. A troll is you. (not that I expect you to get that reference either).

 

[Priceless]

Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Sorry to interrupt the troll, but there's actual news: Buddy Roemer has entered the GOP race.