Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
Since you admit correlation, what is the alternate causation that accounts for them all experiencing harassment for similar issues? As well as being
sued in an attempt to correct their policies that were allowing extreme levels of harassment?
Also by going by your logic, by not decrying the day before protests of the day of silence you promote and encourage that people observing that should be preached to and told they are going to hell.
And because you're a hypocritical dingleberry who is now complaining about "name calling" did you miss where you started with it?
And then added this after I responded without a single bit of "name calling".
You then came up with with a starwman and argumentum ad populum as if that adding any credibility to your dismissal of the article YOU brought up.
**** it, life is stressful enough without purposely beating your head against the unassailable logic of Old os.
I'm assuming you're not a psychiatrist, I know I'm not. Thus you have no familiarity or understanding whatsoever of these cases and the issues involved. And you are not in a position to "know" what caused these poor children to take their lives. It could be different factors were at work in each case. Even though half the kids weren't gay, you posit that hatred of gays factored in all of the suicides. You beg the question that their apparantly common experiences with bullies "caused" them to kill themselves, or even figured prominently in those decisions. That, of course, hasn't and won't stop you from casting your psychotic and unfair aspersions at Michele Bachmann. I'm thinking most people who read your posts (even the ones for whom Bachmann is the anti-Christ) would agree. Evidently, in your mind, smearing Bachmann or agreeing with someone who has, is job one.
During the Clinton administration there was a lot of conspiraracy talk that he was involved somehow in the death of his friend, Vince Foster. That Foster hadn't killed himself, but was murdered. Even for a potus with whom I disagree, there really should be some evidence before implicating him in a murder. Similarly, dislike of Bachmann isn't evidence that she, her friends, supporters or people who agree with her on social issues "caused" these tragedies. And it is the worst sort of slander for you to continue in this vein.
Just for the record, this:
"Also by going by your logic, by not decrying the day before protests of the day of silence you promote and encourage that people observing that should be preached to and told they are going to hell."
is one of the most unintelligable sentences I've ever read. Congratulations. I shudder at the thought of trying to diagram it.
As far as you not engaging me any more is concerned: in psychology it's called an approach/avoidance conflict. Assuming you mean disengaging permanently, I'll miss your thoroughly predictable posts, but not so much as to do anything about it. I hope you only meant to disengage on this issue. Besides, your responses to my posts remind me of Groucho in "Horse Feathers":
"I don't know what they have to say / It makes no difference anyway / Whatever it is, I'm against it. / No matter what it is or who commenced it, I'm against it! / Your proposition may be good / But let's have one thing understood: / Whatever it is, I'm against it. / And even when you've changed it or condensed it, I'm against it! / For months before my son was born / I used to yell from night till morn: / Whatever it is, I'm against it! / And I've kept yelling since I've first commenced it, I'm against it."
