What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

But maybe you could climb down from the mountain top and refer to the post where you said the commentary against Palin was "unfair."

You again are missing the point. I pointed out that Palin didn't hide herself from the spotlight but rather she kept putting herself out there for the world to see, none of which indicates I felt it was always proper. You incorrectly inferred my statement indicated I thought every criticism of her was fair. Man up for once and admit your error.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

You again are missing the point. I pointed out that Palin didn't hide herself from the spotlight but rather she kept putting herself out there for the world to see, none of which indicates I felt it was always proper. You incorrectly inferred my statement indicated I thought every criticism of her was fair. Man up for once and admit your error.

Okay, I admit it. But in the spirit of coming clean, perhaps you'd admit your countless posts criticizing her overwhelmed the subtlety of your point, which I missed. Your view that Palin may have been victimized by unfair commentary came imbedded in this:

"The one fact that you continually and conveniently ignore is that she is not some anti-social waif hiding from the media spotlight, but rather an agenda driven narcissist that put herself out there day after day and unbeknownst to herself came off as a mental midget. Every unfair accusation you crow about doesn't deter from the fact she was a train wreck that never stopped herself from being available to the masses. For that no is to blame but Palin and her handlers. You can cry wolf over and over until the cows come home, but no one is buying what you are selling."

Now I don't find anything in there that sounds remotely like you agreeing with me that some of the commentary has been unfair. But if you say that's what you meant, then that's what you meant. But you can see how I might misunderstand, given the level of bile in your post.

My only point, which brought lefties to Defcon 1 (and has kept them there for 48 hours), was that some of the Palin criticism crosses the line, that's all. Not that she shouin't be criticized, just that even for Sarah Palin, there should be some standards. And a related point: while unattractive, "hypocricy" is not the worst thing in the world. Palin is not my choice for the Republican nomination and I won't vote for her in the primary. However, in the unlikely event she becomes the nominee, I'll vote for her so we can send The Fresh Prince of Back of the Yards back where he came from. And the number of people willing to give "The One" a change of venue grows daily.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Ya know, you dont HAVE to read and respond to everything that McCarthy says...just ignore the guy. He is not trying for reasoned debate, he is just trying to bait you into arguing with him because he has no friends and the neighborhood kids keep egging his house.
 
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Ya know, you dont HAVE to read and respond to everything that McCarthy says...just ignore the guy. He is not trying for reasoned debate, he is just trying to bait you into arguing with him because he has no friends and the neighborhood kids keep egging his house.

Are you Jewish?
 
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Way to not respond to either question in the post. A troll is you. (not that I expect you to get that reference either).

Paid? You, sir, are the biggest phoney who posts here, IMO. And a lawyer to boot. Your respect for and dedication to the First Amendment is really an inspiration. Not. Don't try and turn this around, you're the one who wants people who disagree with you to "shut up," not me.

Obviously you've had your little feelings hurt because I didn't get your brilliant reference to a hockey player. I still don't get it and still don't care.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

I'll be glad when we're finally close enough to Iowa and New Hampshire that we can concentrate on the people actually running. And that's knowing that the next year will have political ads non stop as both sides blow 1.5 billion each or some other absurd number.

Perhaps we could organize a telethon for the innocent inhabitants of Iowa and New Hampshire. It's gonna be brutal, watching all of those Buddy Roemer spots. :eek:
 
Last edited:
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Ya know, you dont HAVE to read and respond to everything that McCarthy says...just ignore the guy. He is not trying for reasoned debate, he is just trying to bait you into arguing with him because he has no friends and the neighborhood kids keep egging his house.

I have him on ignore, but someone quoted him and I got roped in...my bad.

Wow, the troll is quite verbose this afternoon!
 
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Sorry to be relevant to the thread. In non-Hitler reference election news today, it appears that Tpaw tried to strike down Michele Bachmann in an effort to help himself and instead he furthered his irrelevance as a Presidential candidate.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...tens-pawlenty/2011/03/29/gIQA9EjEYI_blog.html

Saw this. MB excels in trivalizing Minnesota nice. The next test would be Romney and ultimately, Perry.
 
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

Paid? You, sir, are the biggest phoney who posts here, IMO. And a lawyer to boot. Your respect for and dedication to the First Amendment is really an inspiration. Not. Don't try and turn this around, you're the one who wants people who disagree with you to "shut up," not me.

The First Amendment means that the government cannot prevent you from speaking an unpopular idea. It says nothing about private citizens telling other citizens to mind their own ***** business. You have a right to speak; you do not have a right to speak without consequences or a right to have others listen. (which you are aptly proving, since you seem to respond to every post without actually having read any of them).

Obviously you've had your little feelings hurt because I didn't get your brilliant reference to a hockey player. I still don't get it and still don't care.

It wasn't my reference, but I'm still wondering how you can have been registered here since 2005 and made over 9,000 posts and yet claim ignorance of an almost ubiquitous meme on this board.

The most logical assumption is that you are a troll and nothing more.
 
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

The First Amendment means that the government cannot prevent you from speaking an unpopular idea. It says nothing about private citizens telling other citizens to mind their own ***** business. You have a right to speak; you do not have a right to speak without consequences or a right to have others listen. (which you are aptly proving, since you seem to respond to every post without actually having read any of them).



It wasn't my reference, but I'm still wondering how you can have been registered here since 2005 and made over 9,000 posts and yet claim ignorance of an almost ubiquitous meme on this board.

The most logical assumption is that you are a troll and nothing more.

These little tutorials on the First Amendment do nothing to enhance your reputation as a guy who respects "the other guy's right to an opinion," even though you may disagree. So stop pounding the table, will ya? The facts are you DON'T respect the other guy's rights to have an opinion, unless you agree. And you have said so, more than once, for all to read. You've said it. You're stuck with it. And you're trying to do a "Clinton" to get out from under it. As I've said, you seem to be quite comfortable suggesting other people not express their opinions. How about just ignoring Palin? That's what I do. But it's not quite as satisfying as shutting her up, is it?

As to "nearly ubiquitous memes" sorry, I don't take the reference, and missed the requirement in the membership materials. Why don't you climb down off the cross and explain it to me, so I'd at least understand your insult.

You throw the word "troll" around as if it has any meaning other than a person with whom you disagree--you and the rest of the people in the PDS ward. We're now in the third day of hysterical responses to my proposition that just maybe Palin's been treated unfairly on occasion. Now I may be a jerk and a troll but I recognize phonies when I read them.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

These little tutorials on the First Amendment do nothing to enhance your reputation as a guy who respects "the other guy's right to an opinion," even though you may disagree.

I respect the right to have the opinion free from government interference, just like I respect Fred Phelps' right to spew his venom. But I get to espouse my own opinion of their opinions as well, as well as my preference that she stop subjecting the rest of America to her derp for the good of the nation.
 
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel

I respect the right to have the opinion free from government interference, just like I respect Fred Phelps' right to spew his venom. But I get to espouse my own opinion of their opinions as well, as well as my preference that she stop subjecting the rest of America to her derp for the good of the nation.

Got it. Goes right up there with "give me liberty or give me death." Poetry. What would we ever do without lawyers? The world would be so much nicer if everyone you disagree with would just shut up, right? Save you the trouble of straining to justify your intolerance. You're not gonna help me out on this Parise reference, are you? I've seen it many times and never taken it. Will somebody else please take pity on a "paid troll" and tell me what it means?

Three days of justifying hatred and intolerance. Can I hear four?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top