I must say...I'm pretty shocked at Hobart checking in at #3 in the East but happy.
Unless of course, you count Nichols (and expect them to hold that #8 spot)
SOMEONE from that conference is going to get a pool A bid, like it or not they have to rank whomever that is for the final secret ranking for seeding purposes. If Nichols losses their conference tournament, someone else in the ECAC-NE WILL be ranked. Lucky for Hobart they have wins over the top two Nichols and Salve Regina. if Johnson and Wales or one of the other bottom of the barrel teams wins it, it could make RNK interesting. I also imagine someone from the MASCAC will be ranked in the end
The smoke is clearing and the Ridder Ralph is about to come out of the warming hut and if he sees the rankings, we'll have 6 more weeks of hockey....
AND HERE THEY ARE
Code:NK/REGION SCHOOL IN REGION RECORD OVERALL RECORD East 1 Trinity (Connecticut) 19-2-1 19-2-1 2 Oswego State 17-1-3 17-2-3 3 Hobart 18-6-0 18-6-0 4 Amherst 15-4-2 16-4-2 5 Norwich 17-3-1 21-3-1 6 Massachusetts Boston 17-3-1 21-3-1 7 Plattsburgh State 17-5-1 17-5-1 8 Nichols 13-3-3 16-3-3 West 1 Adrian 19-3-3 19-3-3 2 Wisconsin-Stevens Point 18-5-0 18-5-0 3 St. Norbert 17-5-2 17-5-2 4 Wisconsin-Eau Claire 15-6-2 15-6-2 5 St. Thomas (Minnesota) 14-5-4 14-5-4 6 Wisconsin-River Falls 18-4-1 18-4-1
Based on the rankings, Stevens Point gets Pool B (W2 > E3). Pool C is going to be a dogfight!
I know you're probably joking, but it's worth repeating at this time of year anyway: the NCAA openly admits to choosing tournament matchups that minimize travel expense, but there is zero evidence that it has ever selected the field with this in mind. It's a myth that pops up around here every season, and it gives me an eye twitch at this point.
At least in regards to the AQ's - but zero evidence??
If you're talking about the matchup, that's the distinction I made in my previous post: the NCAA manipulates those all the time, but it doesn't pick who makes the tourney in the first place based on travel. If you're talking about the participants, then you'll have to jog my memory as to why St. Thomas was a weak Pool C pick.
The match-ups - St Norbert NEVER should have played in the first round that year, lost any faith I had in them.
Why would there have to be ranked teams from the ECACNE or MASCAC? There doesn't have to be anyone ranked from those leagues.
I agree with you Nubs. Consipracy: Needed to rank Nichols so that Hobart would have a Ranked victory?? Hmmm.
How would they seed them without ranking them?
How would they seed them without ranking them?
I enjoy reading the D1 bracketology column on USCHO. Webb has done a D3 version over on the other site that I think is also a pretty good read. Wish Webb still posted here more often...
d3hockey.com/bracketology/men/14-15/feb-18
With Webb's prediction of an 8-3 split, and a prelim game out West, the NCAA will be flying 3 teams to the finals. Wonder if that will have a bearing on the selection discussion? especially the choice between UMB and St Norbert.It was a good analysis too, given the rankings he had to work with.
With Webb's prediction of an 8-3 split, and a prelim game out West, the NCAA will be flying 3 teams to the finals. Wonder if that will have a bearing on the selection discussion? especially the choice between UMB and St Norbert.