What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Status
Not open for further replies.
geezer said:
It's the conservative position because safeguarding life should be the one essential role of government..
Click to expand...

Only up until the point they're out of the womb, equal to about 1% of their life should they live to 70.

geezer said:
I apologize, because while I agree completely, I never would have given you credit for realizing it.
Click to expand...

That's a curious observation as it comes from someone that seems completely incapable of thinking outside the box.

And is Fishy really bringing up late term, an act not being lobbied for by any group of significance?
 
Last edited:
Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Slap Shot said:
Only up until the point they're out of the womb, equal to about 1% of their life should they live to 70.
Click to expand...

I'm all for life,
'till the bastard's born.
And after that,
he's out on his own.
And if he does crime,
tryin' to survive
I'll make d@mn sure he gets,
ELECTRIFIED!
 
joecct said:
This thread took the off ramp to nowhere about 3 pages ago.

So - if Scotland goes Yes tonight, does it destabilize Europe?
Click to expand...
Slightly, it will give those in places like Basque, Catalonia, and the like something to rally on. Heck , I bet it give the Québécois a reason to pipe up again.
 
Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Jimjamesak said:
Slightly, it will give those in places like Basque, Catalonia, and the like something to rally on. Heck , I bet it give the Québécois a reason to pipe up again.
Click to expand...

Let's hope the South gets some ideas.
 
Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Kepler said:
Is that an Ice Station Zebra reference or a Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea reference?
Click to expand...
Ernie Borgnine was not in Voyage. The Admiral was Walter Pidgeon, the bad guy was Michael Ansara, and somewhere/how Peter Lorre was involved. Oh, and the girl was eaten by sharks - inside the Seaview!

Besides, Voyage dealt with the Van Allen belt igniting which melted the polar ice. Somehow NYC did not drown.
 
Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

joecct said:
Ernie Borgnine was not in Voyage. The Admiral was Walter Pidgeon, the bad guy was Michael Ansara, and somewhere/how Peter Lorre was involved. Oh, and the girl was eaten by sharks - inside the Seaview!

Besides, Voyage dealt with the Van Allen belt igniting which melted the polar ice. Somehow NYC did not drown.
Click to expand...


Yeah, but there's a North Pole scene. It might be where they pick up the fanatic who later causes the explosion. Also, "the girl" is Joan Freaking Fontaine!

I was mixing up the Lorre character with Borgnine. They're both short and squat.

"I heard about you. I heard you were dead."
 
Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

joecct said:
Pat - http://m.townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan/2014/09/19/what-will-victory-look-like-n1893784

What'll be the 21st Century equivalent of the Gulf of Tonkin?
Click to expand...

You provide the live tweets, I'll provide the war.

But Jeez, Pat...

But were the Serbs really "aggressors" in fighting to hold their cradle province of Kosovo, which ethnic Albanians were trying to tear away?
Click to expand...

Ethnic cleansing is pretty aggressive.

Sic semp ideology. Deducing practical actions solely from abstract principles invariably leads to reductio ad absurdum.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top