What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

>>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Hey, quick question. How do the playoffs work? I know we are not getting a bye but what does RIT have to do to get home ice all the way to the BCA?

There is no way to get home ice "all the way" without getting the first round bye. Teams 1-4 get a bye for the first round, and home ice during the quarterfinals. RIT can still do this if everything goes their way, but it requires help from the other teams. Teams 5-8 get home ice for the first round, and teams 9-12 go on the road. The winners of the first round are reseeded, but are all on the road for the quarterfinals.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

According to http://www.playoffstatus.com/atlantichockey/atlanticstandings.html , if we win out the worst we can finish is sixth. That means we need help to finish higher than sixth.

That site estimates our chances of a first-round bye at 20%; a first-round home series at 63%.


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

I believe they will be replacing the center hung scoreboard, though I cannot confirm or deny that at this point.

I'm not clear what you mean here. Replacing which center hung scoreboard with what?


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

I'm not clear what you mean here. Replacing which center hung scoreboard with what?


Powers &8^]

As in there won't be a center hung scoreboard (as shown in all the concept drawings so far).
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Here is what President Destler I don't think understands. RIT could easily build what it wants. If they don't want to flip the bill, open an unfinished arena with regular seating and concessions. Finish a master piece arena over a time span of a few years when donations are coming in to RIT. RIT is rushing something that should be the show piece of RIT athletics. I swear this is a Rochester thing, dreaming big but getting discouraged and down sizing to something that one could say is just worth keeping what we have.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Three stats for RIT fans to be enthused about:

1) After only two wins in its first 13 games (going 2-8-3), RIT is 10-5-2 since and 9-4-2 in conference.

2) RIT has the third-best power play in the country at an excellent 25.7%.

3) Jordan Ruby's save percentage in his six consecutive starts is .932 and his GAA is 2.34.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

I'm not clear what you mean here. Replacing which center hung scoreboard with what?Powers &8^]
Rumor has it that there will be no center scoreboard... eliminated in order to keep the roof lower. Replacing the center scoreboard will be two large HD flat scoreboards... one at each end of the arena. Like I said... just a rumor. :)
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Rumor has it that there will be no center scoreboard... eliminated in order to keep the roof lower. Replacing the center scoreboard will be two large HD flat scoreboards... one at each end of the arena. Like I said... just a rumor. :)

I wonder if RIT is going to keep its mouth shut until opening day.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

I take back all my negativity about downgrading. Nothing can be worse than this. haha

1297802332876.jpg%3F-727267679
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

As in there won't be a center hung scoreboard (as shown in all the concept drawings so far).

That... that would be the biggest mistake since President Rose invited the CIA onto campus.


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Hey, quick question. How do the playoffs work? I know we are not getting a bye but what does RIT have to do to get home ice all the way to the BCA?

Actually, I suspect winning out would allow RIT to capture that first round bye, as unbelievable as that sounds considering the start of the season (and even recent disappointing home efforts vs UConn and Bentley). Only 5 teams can at best keep pace with RIT, and UConn could only tie by also winning out. If UConn wins out (possible since they have Army and Sacred Heart remaining), they still finish behind us unless there is a 3 way tie for that position. Even there I don't think we could finish 3rd in any 3 way tiebreak (maybe against a Holy Cross/UConn combo...but Holy Cross is likely in a bye spot with 6 games left against the bottom 3 teams in the conference)

Both AF and Mercyhurst play Niagara - if Mercyhurst drops more than 2 points to Niagara and Robert Morris in their 4 games OR Air Force drops 2 points to Niagara in the last weekend - we finish ahead of them and barring Holy Cross falling apart and UConn winning out (an extremely unlikely scenario, IMO) that would also clinch a bye. Mercyhurst actually only has to drop 1 point - any 3 way tie involving Mercyhurst ends with us ahead of them.

According to http://www.playoffstatus.com/atlantichockey/atlanticstandings.html , if we win out the worst we can finish is sixth. That means we need help to finish higher than sixth.

That site estimates our chances of a first-round bye at 20%; a first-round home series at 63%.
Powers &8^]

I'm not sure that site takes into account Atlantic Hockey's tiebreakers. If they are the same as the first year this playoff format was used, the only possible way RIT could win out and finish 6th is through a HC/UConn/RIT tiebreak, and even there the rules aren't clear whether or not all 3 teams are evaluated at the same time (In which case we would be 6th, with HC 4th and UConn 5th), or if they figure out who ranks first in the tiebreak than examines the remaining two teams seperately (in which case we would finish 5th with UConn 6th and there would be no possible way that I could see that we could win out and still finish 6th).

With HC's remaining schedule, it actually seems like RIT should root for them since they are the lone team that can cause RIT trouble with tiebreaks since we went 0-1-1 against them. Give them one of the 4 byes, and if we take care of buisness this weekend we'll be 1 point behind AF and 2 behind Mercyhurst only needing to tie Mercyhurst or pass AF (or tie them if UConn drops a point) to capture the bye. (EDIT: RIT would win a AF/UConn/RIT 3 way tiebreak if ties are broken inside pods first regardless)


EDIT: If the tiebreaker takes place between teams inside their own pods before crossing over (ie if Holy Cross/UConn/RIT end up tied, they break the Holy Cross/UConn tie first) then Holy Cross would beat UConn, then beat RIT, then RIT would beat UConn for the 5th spot. I see no way that RIT can win out and still finish 6th. They would win every tiebreaker with Western schools that could end up tied with them (2-1 vs both AF and Mercyhurst) and they beat UConn on goal differential when they cross over pods. It also means that rooting for HC isn't necessary, as the only tiebreak we could be involved with them is head to head (which they would win) - they can't mess up a multi-team tiebreak involving us and another western team (or another eastern team, for that matter)
 
Last edited:
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Really that whole block of text just boils down to (assuming AH does a pod style tiebreak) winning out and Niagara winning a single game or tying Air Force to get a bye.

Losing or tying to Air Force this weekend will complicate matters (although at least everyone else will have played 2 (or 3) more games so the picture will be a little clearer.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Sacred Heart, if USCHO scoreboard is to believed, has a 7-3 lead over Holy Cross with 2 left in the 3rd.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Something I wrote on the forum back in mid-January:

" The longer Sacred Heart goes w/o a win the more I would not want to be playing them... "

Final: Holy Cross 3 - Sacred Heart 7

Blaze you beat me by a minute!
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Now that we don't have to play them, I'm all for them playing the role of spoiler. I still have my fingers crossed that AIC grabs the 10 seed.
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Man here's to hoping'ology.

Hopingology with a few weeks left.........

Providence
16 RIT vs. 1 Quinnipiac
12 Yale vs. 7 Minnesota State


Read more: http://www.uscho.com/bracketology/2...a-lot-of-teams-are-on-the-move/#ixzz2LUCamvTP

I'd rather they be in ManchVegas but Mohegan Sun would be a consolation side trip. :p
 
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half


Man and I thought Ed could do silent vistor team goal calls...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS 2012-13: Clawing our way up the standings in the 2nd half

Man and I thought Ed could do silent vistor team goal calls...

Our friend John sounds very sad when RIT scores. :(
 
Back
Top