Re: Ohio State Coach???
Like many, I have been following the Ohio State story with interest and reading the commentary made on this forum. I have to admit that I have been confused with your comments on the athletic department administration's performance...
You and osualum86 handled your little dust-up just fine. But with your indulgence, let me add a few more comments to the mix.
First and very importantly, osualum86 quickly reconfirmed his status as a positive, constructive poster. As you've acknowledged, this is beyond question.
Second, my take on the tension between the Department of Athletics and the Hockey Fanbase is somewhat different than other Buckeye fans. The truth is that the Department does do a great deal for the hockey programs, and does care. But there are some important disagreements, along with a communications issue. Let's start with a story from a happier time.
Back in the 1990's, then Athletic Director Andy Geiger would occasionally come to the Ice Rink to attend games. He would express public regret over the shabbiness of the facility. Shabby was the exact term he used. Fighting words? Precisely the opposite. He cared enough to show up. He came with an open mind and saw the truth. He had the integrity to speak the truth. He was willing to do something about the problems that existed at that time, and did.
The post-renovations Ice Rink is a much better facility than the 1990's edition, but it's still very basic. The competition offers more bells and whistles; it's impossible not to notice. Then there's the Schott. Wonderful, deluxe, and much too big for D-1 Hockey. And not available for Men's Hockey playoffs, as the Men's program experienced on multiple occasions. These issues are festering wounds that can't seem to heal. One irony: With the advent of the B1G Hockey playoff format, there's no longer a need to put the Schott on hold for possible Men's playoff games. And yet the bad feelings persist.
It would do a world of good if the powers-that-be would simply reach out to the hockey community and acknowledge these issues in the manner that Geiger did. Instead, what the fanbase perceives goes something like this:
The Department has done what it can for the hockey community. No further comment. And you get no further questions.
The apparent belief is that conceding there are problems would be a sign of weakness. If fact, the exact opposite is true: It's the stonewalling that's a sign of weakness, particularly in a university environment. From my particular vantage point, I find the disconnect very frustrating to behold.
If I had a daughter playing for OSU, I would be quite pleased and impressed with how they have handled the current situation. They have not made a mess of it like UMD has with Miller. I also believe that they will make the right decision for this talented group of young women and for the group waiting in the wings.
Excellent point.
I would add that Ohio State is a truly great place, both to go to school and to compete in Athletics. Pretty much every imaginable is major offered. Though we're huge, it can be close knit within your department or extracurricular activity. In athletics, we consistently compete against the best. We win our share, and then some.
Back to the Head Coach search.