Re: Ohio State Coach???
High historical coach turnover, poor hockey facilities, minimal historical program success, lackluster athletic department support, location (though there are definitely worse - Erie, Duluth, etc), distance from any natural hockey breeding grounds (MN, MI, IL, WI, NY, New England), etc. Why would you leave another head coaching job for that situation if you were stable? I would agree that in theory OSU could pay a higher salary than most other schools, but has the admin shown that kind of support in the past? It is interesting that Sisti has shown interest at UMD - if he didn't also apply at OSU that would be pretty telling for me regarding OSUs chance at getting an on the job D1 coach. Does OSU have to list their candidates like the MN schools?
Not exactly music to my ears, though I do appreciate a direct answer. IMO some of the items on your laundry list have merit, others not so much. But while we might spin certain issues differently, my position remains that there isn't any particular change from the two previous hiring periods.
The recruiting issue is a case in point. We have had some Ohio kids on the team. Meaghan Mulvaney and April Stojack come immediately to mind. Still, it's clearly true that Ohio doesn't produce as many D-1 prospects as the states on your list. But at the same time, nearby MI & IL don't have any D-1 programs in Women's Hockey. WI has only the Badgers. The province of Ontario is close by. People have been known to commute from Ontario for games. Lots of competition for the MN kids, but there are lots of them. Recruiting here is a challenge, but it's far from hopeless. The track record so far is pretty clear. We've had the personnel to be able to crack the Top 10, but haven't been able to reach the next level and get into the 8 team NCAA field. We're in the middle of the pack in the best league -- certainly not a bottom-feeder, either in the conference or nationally. To me, that's a pretty inviting challenge for the right coach. A chance to be a real difference-maker. A difficult but achievable mission. None of that has changed much over the last 16 years; the opportunity is still there.
While stability has its selling points, elite level coaches are competitive people looking for a way to get to the top. Yes, the jobs in Minneapolis and Madison would be more attractive, based on the history to date. But do you really expect either of those jobs to open up any time soon? And even if so, isn't it likely that those positions will go to coaches with strong Gopher or Badger bloodlines? Of the viable options to make a run for top, I would think OSU would be one of the most attractive launching pads.
Before wrapping this up, I need to respectfully disagree on the turnover rate. Two changes in sixteen years is not a revolving door. And while "not winning enough" may have had something to do with the end of Coach Barto's tenure, everyone on the board is aware of what led to the current vacancy. As regrettable as that situation was, it doesn't have anything to do with the quality of the opportunity moving forward.
Last but not least, I can't give you a definitive answer on the disclosure question. I honestly don't think that there is a requirement to disclose the names of all of the finalists, though I could be wrong. With most coaching hires at OSU -- not limiting this to hockey -- I simply don't recall knowing who the runner-up candidates were. Yes, in some cases the press gets wind of who's interviewing. In other cases, a runner-up might choose to publicly comment. But routinely releasing a list of interviewees, as a matter of law or policy? Could be I'm not paying enough attention, but that just doesn't ring a bell.