What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Brenthoven said:
If the player tackled had lined up as a QB, I would think so.
Click to expand...

I thought it had to be a throwing play (or else tackled before it's clearly established as a run) to count as a sack.

If a QB gets stopped in the backfield on a designed QB draw, for instance, that shouldn't count as a sack.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

I don't understand this 3rd QB issue with Vick and the Eagles.

NFL Rule: The QB listed as 3rd for a game can not come in the game for the first 3 quarters. If he does, then the 1st and 2nd QB can not come back in to the game at all.

OK I get that.

Why not just list Vick as a WR and completely avoid having to list him as the #2 QB in order to play him in the wildcat?

Seems like a simple work around to me. Since its clear any player can take the snap. So even if he had to play QB due to injuries, it would just be a so-called "wildcat" formation the rest of the game.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

JF_Gophers said:
I don't understand this 3rd QB issue with Vick and the Eagles.

NFL Rule: The QB listed as 3rd for a game can not come in the game for the first 3 quarters. If he does, then the 1st and 2nd QB can not come back in to the game at all.

OK I get that.

Why not just list Vick as a WR and completely avoid having to list him as the #2 QB in order to play him in the wildcat?

Seems like a simple work around to me. Since its clear any player can take the snap. So even if he had to play QB due to injuries, it would just be a so-called "wildcat" formation the rest of the game.
Click to expand...

can a WR be a #7?
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

just googled this

In summary:

Position(s)____Primary_______Alternate
QB, P, K_______1-19

RB, DB________20-49

C____________50-59_________60-79

G, T__________60-79

WR__________80-89________10-19

TE ___________80-89

DL (NT/DT/DE)__60-79________90-99

LB_____________50-59_________90-99
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

mookie1995 said:
just googled this

In summary:

Position(s)____Primary_______Alternate
QB, P, K_______1-19

RB, DB________20-49

C____________50-59_________60-79

G, T__________60-79

WR__________80-89________10-19

TE ___________80-89

DL (NT/DT/DE)__60-79________90-99

LB_____________50-59_________90-99
Click to expand...

Interesting...so they could just give him #17, and call it good...
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

I also learned that apparently the 3rd QB is the 46th player on a 45 man roster. Which is why the rule exists that once he enters, if in the first 3 quarters, the other QBs can not re-enter the game.

So if they replace someone on the active 45 man then its not an issue.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

JF_Gophers said:
I also learned that apparently the 3rd QB is the 46th player on a 45 man roster. Which is why the rule exists that once he enters, if in the first 3 quarters, the other QBs can not re-enter the game.

So if they replace someone on the active 45 man then its not an issue.
Click to expand...

I THINK that if the first two qbs are pulled, or hurt, and the 3rd qb comes in, but then the 3rd qb gets hurt, then one of the first two qbs can re-enter the game.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Brenthoven said:
I THINK that if the first two qbs are pulled, or hurt, and the 3rd qb comes in, but then the 3rd qb gets hurt, then one of the first two qbs can re-enter the game.
Click to expand...

before the 4th qtr, yes - you are right.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Redskins are half a game away from becoming a Trivial Pursuit answer.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

French Rage said:
Redskins are half a game away from becoming a Trivial Pursuit answer.
Click to expand...

Not any more they're not.

They had just 94 yards of offense at the half. We're 1:45 into the third quarter and they now have 172.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Twitch Boy said:
Not any more they're not.

They had just 94 yards of offense at the half. We're 1:45 into the third quarter and they now have 172.
Click to expand...

Hey, we're still losing and we play down to our opponent, so don't expect too much.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Brenthoven said:
The Seabags' uniforms need to burn.
Click to expand...

Wherever would they get the idea to do such a thing?

orlandothunder.jpg


Oh... Right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top