TonyTheTiger20
#SOAR
Listen, when the Lams are in red, white, and blue, they have my full support. No question.These two women you refer to as hacks are world class players.
But come on dude, they're definitely hacks.
Listen, when the Lams are in red, white, and blue, they have my full support. No question.These two women you refer to as hacks are world class players.
Listen, when the Lams are in red, white, and blue, they have my full support. No question.
But come on dude, they're definitely hacks.
I looked up tickets and saw they were something like $27. Holy chit!!? For a women's, exhibition hockey game? Just wow.
??
I don't think you've watched the Jenner elbow yet or......
But they weren't hacks last night, they were good teammates.
This blog post has the Jenner elbow in question. [click to view] Maybe you should think twice before spouting off. These two women you refer to as hacks are world class players.
JLam is as dirty as they come and there is no way that you can say that her check was clean. First off, it was a body-check and second it was about 5 degrees away from being a very dangerous hit from behind. Her reaction after the check is all the evidence that I need to know that it was dirty. She looked around to check the direction of the first CDN player to come after her. She knew what she was doing and she was preparing for the backlash. That being said, JLam being dirty greatly contributes to her effectiveness as a player. Don't like her though.
Edit: I agree with Tuuk as well. Can't see Jenner's elbow come up. Pucci steps into her path after playing the puck and Jenner drops her shoulder a bit to get her out of the way. The elbow rises as a follow through on the contact.
So according to you:
Jenner didn't land an elbow so she only body-checked and JLam was close to a dirty hit, but she only body-checked ALSO. 2 minute penalties were assessed to both. The refs let em play and guess what? They fought! The history with Jenner cannot be forgotten, especially when US is up 4-1. With no future consequences she stuck up for her teammate.
Whatever you think of Jenner's hit/elbow, the Lams intent wasnt to be dirty for no reason at all, it was retaliatory and very intentional.
I thought that MLam made that point by taking out Szabados? Or was that something else?
Jenners hit and penalty was part of the game. JLam targeted Jenner as retaliation. Defending? Sure, why not. Dirty? Absolutely. BTW, I said CLOSE to being a dangerous hit, not a dirty hit.
So its dirty because body-checking (intentional or not) isn't allowed in womens hockey? Guess what, Fighting happens to be apart of the game also. Its only a 5 min penalty. Szabados got nominated for actress of the year btw
Whatever. You can carry on with your ND love-in. In a rare instance, I agree with TTT. The Lams are hacks!
But they weren't hacks last night, they were good teammates.
Yup, the brawl made the news with video, note of the final score, and the fact that they play again in St Paul next weekend.
Before this conversation boils down to hockey I just want to throw in my appreciation for seeing this game on my big screen HD LCD. I pay and watch every time for the video streams of college (Gopher) games. It was just marvelous to see women's hockey with visual clarity generally reserved for the NHL and the Gopher men.
....Just watched it again and thought Stone was smart to have her fighting line on the ice with 16 seconds to go.
My opinion:
1) I've watched the referee in WCHA action. I'm not taking her word on anything.
2) Jenner got her two minutes worth for bodychecking but there was no elbow. It wasn't especially egregious as hits go. I understand that there is a history here but this just wasn't much of a cheap shot.
3) The JLam check was a cheap shot. It's not just that she hit her but that she really followed through into the boards. This was definitely boarding and I would have considered giving it five on its own.
4) As the fight breaks out, MLam delivers a series of cross checks to the back of Daoust who really hadn't done much to that point other skate to the crease and get railroaded by Knight.
So it was a bad situation already but the Lamoureuxs went out of their way to escalate things in a serious way. Boarding Jenner goes way beyond just defending your teammate.
My cable provider provides live internet streaming (in HD) of virtually everything that has ever aired on the TV. So, yeah, I'm plenty familiar with HDMI transfer from PC to TV. I pull it up on the laptop and watch it on TV, using the computer mouse instead of the TV remote control for things like pause and audio level. I don't bother with transferring hockey streaming to the TV as the video quality is usually so poor that I often don't even bother to go full screen on my computer monitor. The video is grainy on the smallest size and immediately blurs into headache material as it gets blown up. It is bad at 15 inches, please, no way at 55.True! Theoretically, you should be able to just project a streamed game from your laptop onto a TV screen via HDMI cable, Thunderbolt or whatever connector is compatible.....but.....neither my PC nor our kids' MACs can be set to format the picture to fill the entire TV screen: either the picture fills only part of the TV screen (similar effect as with certain aspect-ratio movies on DVD) or it spills over beyond the boundaries of the TV screen. So you do end up watching the picture on the TV screen, but with a smaller picture than a cable broadcast would provide. And with whatever shortcomings in quality may be inherent in the streaming feed.
Has anybody encountered, and solved, this problem?
My cable provider provides live internet streaming (in HD) of virtually everything that has ever aired on the TV. So, yeah, I'm plenty familiar with HDMI transfer from PC to TV. I pull it up on the laptop and watch it on TV, using the computer mouse instead of the TV remote control for things like pause and audio level. I don't bother with transferring hockey streaming to the TV as the video quality is usually so poor that I often don't even bother to go full screen on my computer monitor. The video is grainy on the smallest size and immediately blurs into headache material as it gets blown up. It is bad at 15 inches, please, no way at 55.
I'm not positive about this but on my new TV I think you do that size formatting in the TV menu, not the PC.