Nick Papagiorgio
Holding court
Re: Hobey hat trick
My tone! Yea, you can really figure out my tone on a message board. I'm glad every time you see a BC fan on a message board you put your hand down your pants and are reminded of Cornell's 2003 win over BC in the NCAAs in your best season in the past what, 20 years? I'm all broken up about it, being a few years after and before two national titles and all. Luckily you guys end up in another bracket or meet an early demise most of the other years while BC trudges on to bigger and better things. Oh well, so sad, that's life. (FWIW, you all got hosed in Buffalo on that bogus high stick review but that's hockey!).
With that out of the way, perhaps you should go back to the original point (if you can get that memory of 2003 out of your head for a few seconds) and wonder why someone (illogically?) believes that the ECAC has been competitive without even providing any actual reasoning for this contention all the while providing a smokescreen to the issue with wording like, "Not bad for a league in which most (all?) member schools do NOT offer athletic scholarsips, and most (all?) member schools demand rigorous academic achievement from their athletes"?
In the end, we're talking about the Hobey and it is certainly not unreasonable to discount a player's numbers or accomplishments in a terrible league like the ECAC. That's all.
Don't worry, Osorojo. While Nick's argument is legitimate, his tone tells me that he's still bitter about the last time BC faced Cornell in March.
My tone! Yea, you can really figure out my tone on a message board. I'm glad every time you see a BC fan on a message board you put your hand down your pants and are reminded of Cornell's 2003 win over BC in the NCAAs in your best season in the past what, 20 years? I'm all broken up about it, being a few years after and before two national titles and all. Luckily you guys end up in another bracket or meet an early demise most of the other years while BC trudges on to bigger and better things. Oh well, so sad, that's life. (FWIW, you all got hosed in Buffalo on that bogus high stick review but that's hockey!).
With that out of the way, perhaps you should go back to the original point (if you can get that memory of 2003 out of your head for a few seconds) and wonder why someone (illogically?) believes that the ECAC has been competitive without even providing any actual reasoning for this contention all the while providing a smokescreen to the issue with wording like, "Not bad for a league in which most (all?) member schools do NOT offer athletic scholarsips, and most (all?) member schools demand rigorous academic achievement from their athletes"?
In the end, we're talking about the Hobey and it is certainly not unreasonable to discount a player's numbers or accomplishments in a terrible league like the ECAC. That's all.