ExileOnDaytonStreet
Drunkard
Yeah, but just by a <strike>hair</strike> scalp.Custer.
Yeah, but just by a <strike>hair</strike> scalp.Custer.
I was in Atlanta over the weekend visiting a friend and his wife. The wife's mother, a southern belle, joined us for lunch. When she found out I had a horse she asked what his name was and I answered "Sherman". It got quiet. Then she asked me where I came up with that name and, smiling, I told her his registered name was William Tecumseh Sherman because he's a tremendous trail horse that goes through anything! She didn't say another word. Go figure.
Here's an excerpt of a letter Sherman wrote to a secessionist friend. He got it right on the nose.
You people of the South don't know what you are doing. This country will be drenched in blood, and God only knows how it will end. It is all folly, madness, a crime against civilization! You people speak so lightly of war; you don't know what you're talking about. War is a terrible thing! You mistake, too, the people of the North. They are a peaceable people but an earnest people, and they will fight, too. They are not going to let this country be destroyed without a mighty effort to save it... Besides, where are your men and appliances of war to contend against them? The North can make a steam engine, locomotive, or railway car; hardly a yard of cloth or pair of shoes can you make. You are rushing into war with one of the most powerful, ingeniously mechanical, and determined people on Earth—right at your doors. You are bound to fail. Only in your spirit and determination are you prepared for war. In all else you are totally unprepared, with a bad cause to start with. At first you will make headway, but as your limited resources begin to fail, shut out from the markets of Europe as you will be, your cause will begin to wane. If your people will but stop and think, they must see in the end that you will surely fail.
I was in Atlanta over the weekend visiting a friend and his wife. The wife's mother, a southern belle, joined us for lunch. When she found out I had a horse she asked what his name was and I answered "Sherman". It got quiet. Then she asked me where I came up with that name and, smiling, I told her his registered name was William Tecumseh Sherman because he's a tremendous trail horse that goes through anything! She didn't say another word. Go figure.
Gen. Anthony McAuliffe - a man of few words.
"Double the lad's bet, you toad." The greatest accomplishments of Lee and Jackson came after they renounced their citizenships and pledged allegiance to another country, which declared war on and attacked the United States.
OMG, I'm defending Priceless.
Increable, do you know when that was written? He could not have been more prophetic (although one assumes that 150 years ago it was much more problematic to see such things) had he a crystal ball.
Unfortunately for your theory, the secession of the southern states was not recognized. The bottom line is that the US Military recognizes the heritage of both sides of the war. Some modern units trace their own lineage back to Confederate elements. Are they treasonous?
This should probably be your first clue that you're wrong.
Interesting, but not really on point, eh?
Actually, it's the heart of the point. But I know it's more convenient to ignore facts.
cavil,quibble, b.s. You want to include a couple of traitors to the list (one of whom was grossly overrated) knock yourself out. I'm not ignoring "facts" which you maintain are determinative, I'm disagreeing with them.
You're disagreeing with facts. That's incredible.
Here I've assumed all along you can read. I said I was disagreeing with YOUR ASSESSMENT of those facts.
It's not a matter of my assessment of the facts. It's a matter of historical record.
You evidently have no relationship with "context."
You evidently have no relationship with "accuracy."