What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Duluth hockey fans warned after racist chants

Re: Duluth hockey fans warned after racist chants

It's so much more fun to believe this myth, isn't it? Fits right in with your view of "whitey," doesn't it? There is no "evidence" the story is true. Let alone an "abundance" of evidence. What there is is discredited lying by a fired liar. Believe what you wish, but please dont imply there's a legitimate academic disagreement here. There isn't. It never happened. And your PhD pal is wrong. Rumors are generally not the standard in discussing history. Facts are inconvenient things. Churchill, and anyone who agrees with him on this matter, is not a historian, but a polemicist. Big difference.

And if the government of the United States was engaged in "genocide" against the Indians, we did a pretty p*ss poor job of it.

I actually don't think you could find a person in the 1830's who would be willing to gather up small pox infected blankets.
 
Re: Duluth hockey fans warned after racist chants

UND fans: clean your own house first

poster2.jpg
 
Re: Duluth hockey fans warned after racist chants

No one I know puts any stock whatsoever in Ward Churchill. And yes, your myth probably is much more fun to believe in. And for the record, you can stop right away if you think you have any clue what my view of "whitey" is. You don't. Let it go.

It's amazing to me that anyone would question the attempt at genocide.

The myth in question is the one you and the other anti-white types believe in so fervently. So please don't try to childishly turn this argument around. Those on your side of this argument are asserting, absent any evidence, that this attempt to commit this specific act of genocide occurred. It is up to your side to prove it. You haven't come close. And prominent historians who have studied it have come to the same conclusion. I'll take your advice to "let it go" under advisement. But I have a right to my opinion, as you have to yours. No? Admit it, you just love a chance to start some sh*t with me, don't you?

So it amazes you that anyone would question "the attempt at genocide." Even if it's a lie? White Guilt uber alles?
 
Last edited:
Re: Duluth hockey fans warned after racist chants

I actually don't think you could find a person in the 1830's who would be willing to gather up small pox infected blankets.
What did they call Minnesotans back then?
 
Re: Duluth hockey fans warned after racist chants

So, next time, you'll excuse anyone who starts chanting "potato famine" or "bunch-of-drunk-micks"at the Fighting Irish, right? Right? No nickname, no chants. Right?

Just for RWD. I thought I'd be helpful to bring the post to the forefront, so she doesn't have to search for it. Please answer the question, RWD.
 
Whose fault is it that you're illiterate?

I read your little "blog"
Your argument is if UND doesn't have the name, then there are no chants, and considering UND chose to have the name, it must be their fault then right?
Your students are at fault 100% for those chants, no one else is even remotely culpable for it and to say otherwise is disgusting.
Not that we should expect anything less from a **** like you.
 
Re: Duluth hockey fans warned after racist chants

I read your little "blog"
Your argument is if UND doesn't have the name, then there are no chants, and considering UND chose to have the name, it must be their fault then right?
Your students are at fault 100% for those chants, no one else is even remotely culpable for it and it say otherwise is disgusting.
Not that we should expect anything less from a **** like you.

Then you didn't read it.
Maybe go find an educated person and they can read it aloud to you.
 
Re: Duluth hockey fans warned after racist chants

I actually don't think you could find a person in the 1830's who would be willing to gather up small pox infected blankets.

Perhaps. They'd certainly be taking a huge risk, wouldn't they? But that's not the issue. The anti-white types aren't dealing with theorecticals, they're making a specific claim that it actually happened. That strikes me as a significant difference. However, it's much easier for anti-whitey types to believe it, because they "know" how evil whitey is. You can't put ANYTHING past Whitey.
 
Perhaps. And risk getting infected in the process. But that's not the issue. The anti-white types aren't dealing with theorecticals, they're making a specific claim that it actually happened. That strikes me as a significant difference. However, it's much easier for anti-whitey types to believe it, because they "know" how evil whitey is. You can't put ANYTHING past Whitey.

Who's "anti-white"?

So, if you are disgusted with people using "smallpox blanket" in a chant at a hockey game, you're "anti-white"?

Wow, just wow.
 
Re: Duluth hockey fans warned after racist chants

I guess RWD either has me on ignore, or is too ignorant/arrogant to realize that her stance is utterly ridiculous and has zero merit. Go figure.
 
Re: Duluth hockey fans warned after racist chants

The myth in question is the one you and the other anti-white types believe in so fervently. So please don't try to childishly turn this argument around. Those on your side of this argument are asserting, absent any evidence, that this attempt to commit this specific act of genocide occurred. It is up to your side to prove it. You haven't come close. And prominent historians who have studied it have come to the same conclusion. I'll take your advice to "let it go" under advisement. But I have a right to my opinion, as you have to yours. No? Admit it, you just love a chance to start some sh*t with me, don't you?

So it amazes you that anyone would question "the attempt at genocide." Even if it's a lie? White Guilt uber alles?
And I have no white guilt. I am neither proud nor ashamed of my white skin. I did nothing to get it, either positive or negative. It is neither good nor bad, it just is. I feel no guilt over it, and I feel no pride in it. What I do know is that early American history is full of incidents of the US government going out of their way to exterminate the natives. They failed. But to say that they tried is not a lie. I wonder why it is that you acuse me of being anti-white. Is it so hard for you to criticize the behavior of people to whom you have no connection whatsoever other than skin color and national origin? There are many many white Americans that I think are terrible people. (You, for the record, are not one of them) Does this make me anti-white? Am I anti-white because I believe the large amount of documented evidence showing that for quite some time both the British and American government actively tried to wipe out an entire race of people? Or is it simpler? Am I anti-white because I am liberal and all liberals must be anti-white.

And yes, I do like starting **** with you; you're fun to argue with. But frankly, I was shocked that you actually seemed to believe that Ward Churchill was the origin of the smallpox blanket thing. Regardless of whether they were used, or whether germ warfare in general was used, the idea of it most certainly did not start ten years ago.
 
Back
Top