ScoobyDoo
NPC
The state department (not the dept of justice) is re opening its investigation into Hillary's emails.
Fantastic. Just wonderful.
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36742095
Last edited:
The state department (not the dept of justice) is re opening its investigation into Hillary's emails.
While I would like to think that...the senate came out of it split and the house in the hands of the GOP. Oh and a certain 8 year term of W lay in the future. It seems to have sacrificed several GOP operatives for the standing president...while leaving the ideologies at best untouched and at worst favoring the GOP in upcoming elections.
State got called out by the FBI as the weakest regarding handling of classified. They have to look like they're doing something.
Name me a policy victory the GOP has sustained in the last 20 years?
W was part of the ruin of the GOP resulting from that era. It'll take 30 years to live him down at least and his horrific Presidency also laid waste to the GOP notions of deregulation and tax cuts for the rich helps the economy.
The GOP's descent into the clown show that it is, chock full of conspiracy theorists and lunatics, started in the late 90's. That's also when the people who should have known better (the alleged moderate sane people) went along for the ride. Its been downhill ever since. Name me a policy victory the GOP has sustained in the last 20 years? Bush tax cuts were by and large reversed. Iraq war turned into worst foreign policy disaster in US history. Frankly, the only Republican law that exists in its original form over that time is the Patriot Act.![]()
I said in the last 20 years. Tax rates have gone UP on the highest earners according to our graph since I'm guessing the 1986 tax reform bill. This should encourage you as the Dem Presidents have clearly been fighting the good fight on this.
W was part of the ruin of the GOP resulting from that era. It'll take 30 years to live him down at least and his horrific Presidency also laid waste to the GOP notions of deregulation and tax cuts for the rich helps the economy....
When we finally reinstate Eisenhower Era progressive taxation...
how all y'all conveniently forget it was bubba who signed away glass steagall![]()
LOL. Good one.
That rate has stayed low since 1981. Protecting that is the sole mission of the GOP. They have done their job so well now we expend all our energy fighting for +4/5 points. Restoring the middle class means +40/50.
When we finally reinstate Eisenhower Era progressive taxation the GOP will have failed. Everything else is noise to them.
Well, you gotta get the public along as well. Continuing our trip down memory lane, I'm sure you recall back in the 80's when people pulling in about 20K a year were clamoring for tax cuts for the rich in the hopes that trickle down economics actually worked. Took a long time to defeat that snake oil, and it was pretty much Bill Clinton who crushed supply side economics.
I think the public at large would be happy with a 45% or so upper income tax rate. Recall too that the ACA imposed a higher Medicare tax on the wealthy so they're already closer to the mid-40's. Maybe even up to 50% over a certain level. You're going to have to do a lot more work to get people to agree that 70%-90% is a fair #. Whether I agree with you or not, I'm not sure the general electorate is there on this proposal.
how all y'all conveniently forget it was bubba who signed away glass steagall![]()
Real America...I wonder what he means by that? He deleted the tweet when people went nuts about it and then posted this to try and not sound like a racist tool who threatened the President on an open social forum:
"I wasn't calling for violence, against Obama or anyone. Obama's words & BLM's deeds have gotten cops killed. Time for us to defend our cops."
The really sad thing is, this guy is not alone.
Haven't forgotten at all. How Clinton, just like Obama, made a concerted effort to rule from the middle, and still got pilloried for whatever he did by the right wing.
So, if you're gonna get attacked for it anyway, why don't Democrats actually espouse some, you know, left policy positions?