Trump says he would welcome Palin on his ticket.![]()
Still say Jeb is the nominee. Trump will wait around until he gets as much publicity as he possibly can via leading in the polls, the debates, etc. Then in about 4 months when Trump falls out of favor, he will go third party. He doesn't like to lose...and if he doesn't get the nomination, he'll be losing. As a third party candidate, Trump loses less, he gets the last laugh on the GOP candidates with whom he will have been fighting for 6 months, and he stays in the limelight as long as possible.
Yeah, how brave of her to make a promise about something 10 years from now. How about 50% by the end of her first term or she doesn't run again?
If Jebbers! is the nominee, somebody is going to be looking at a 3rd party bid.
The same could have been said for 2012. Romney was unappealing to the herpa-derps (really, to anyone), THE COMMINIST MUSLIN HITLAR!!11! was about to send his army of ACORN robot monsters to rape all white Christians, etc., they were ACOMIN FOR OUR GUNZ!, and of course who can forget Ebola?
If the Tea Party couldn't get it for the Unblackening, how much less likely for an AIPAC shill well to the right of him?
Jeb! will be the nominee, there will be no third party insurgency, all the usual suspects will close ranks at the convention, and the election will come down to FL and OH. Again.
So, you think they're going all in on boring establishment for 3 elections in a row? I don't think so.
I think they don't have a choice. There's a huge gap between the establish dude and the clown car. If one of the clowns does an about-face and starts acting mature and conciliatory, he (sorry Carly) would have a clean niche to themselves. I think this was supposed to be Rubio's gameplan, but the Trumpification of the GOP race looks like it's going to make them all go full derp.
Jeb! is going to be the only reasonable choice.
This also means Jeb! doesn't need to go derp unless he wants to, so he can selectively derp out on say guns and Israel (the latter is easy since he's already there), while actually facing real fact when it comes to say health insurance or climate change. His father and brother each talked out of both sides of their mouth when required; Bushes seem to be good at it, perhaps they practice at Thanksgiving.
Being superficially centrist allowed Dubya to sneak into office. That used to be the Republican Gambit: you talk centrist but you govern radical. It depends upon most Americans not paying attention, and it seems to work.
I just don't see anybody from the Crazy Train challenging him. The wizards of id are funny, but if they start rolling up delegates the adults will step in.
Well, this is WHY I was picking Walker. Walker looks establishment. Smells establishment. Has all the street cred (Governor, in with the Koch's, passed all the laws the GOP loves in a purple state, etc. etc. etc.) and at the SAME TIME is one of the biggest true believers in the stable. He's Cruz without the derp. He's Trump without the derp.
Jeb is just another McCain, Mitt Romney clone. Protect the 1%ers money while pretending to care about Cleetus and his confederate flag. Walker cares about Cleetus.
I'm sure I don't know Walker as well as you do, but he seems like the usual silver spoon Republican who believes inequality reflects merit and wants to protect the rich from "the mob." He cares about Cleetus like I care about spiders: they can be useful, but the moment they get in my way... no soup for them.
I believe Walker could still fill that niche, though. But he seems to play the fundy organ when he can, and that will not get you invited to dinner with the polite old money.
Polite old money is the Koch's.
No. No, it's really not. The Kochs, the Waltons, etc are all nouveau riche. The real old money treats them like they have collective BO. They are not at the table when the real stuff gets discussed.
Brainwashing via media and a pretended common interest.Ok. I see. Someday you'll have to explain to me how polite old money's political party was co-opted by the lunatic fringe.
Ok. I see. Someday you'll have to explain to me how polite old money's political party was co-opted by the lunatic fringe.
Polite old money owns a piece of both parties. Or, more accurately, polite old money is more foundational -- the parties float on top of it. The GOP has typically been more directly reflective of its values, simply because preservation of the status quo is the name of the game for old money (and the obfuscation and protection of assets is part of the game). So while elections and parties have some effect, old money is mostly beyond the reach of the electorate, of politics, even of commerce.
The last thirty years has been the history of how loonies came to control a big portion of the GOP, and that's been kind of like a 19th century "pan" movement of ethnic self-discovery. Just as, say, Czechs created an ethnic self-identity and then used it to cleave their territory out of the control of the Austro-Hungarians, so herpa-derps created their own self-identity and then started a separatist movement inside the GOP to become their own "state within a state". This is still a work in progress -- but they have the precedent of their segregation as Dixiecrats to fall back on as a model for how to effectively hold their power locally while protecting their agenda by playing balance of power politics nationally. It worked from 2000-06 and it could still work.
Is Trump old money or new money? I'm guessing new.
Trump is like a hillbilly who wins the lottery. He's not even new money -- he's accidental money. His great grand-children will be joining Justin Bieber's and Roger Clemens' in the poorhouse.
Aaaah, so it's like a puppet show. GOP is one puppet, and Democrats are the other puppet. The puppet master is Old Money who doesn't have to care who wins because they control everything anyway.
I wish I could be the hillbilly that won the lottery. Sigh.