norm1909
Larry Normandin
Re: Buffalo State, SUNY Geneseo penalized for aid violations
The bottom line to the NCAA, IMO, wasn't the label or the terms of the grants, but simply that the grants failed to attract a significant number of non-student athletes, giving them appearance (and de-facto effect) of student athlete financial-aid packages. I believe and I think the NCAA believes as well, that it was NOT the intention of the schools to in any-way-shape-or-form to circumvent the NCAA DIII financial aid policies, but rather the unfortunate result of no one, other than the athletic departments, actively marketing the grant programs, and consequently, little to no student participation beyond the student athletes. Was their negligence on anyone part? I don’t think so, I believe the admissions and financial aid offices, in good faith at compliance, did not consider the student’s athletic participation when making their decisions and in good faith did not even track athletic status of those admitted. While the athletic departments were simply using all available resources in recruiting, not really thinking their actions and success would skew the grant programs so much as to create the situation that has foiled all their well intentioned efforts.
That said; it also appears that sometime, around 2006, the NCAA warned them that their programs might be having a lopsided effect. I am not certain if the warning, however, was directed at them specifically and individually, or rather a general advisory to all DIII programs aimed at all "international financial incentive programs". If Geneseo and Buffalo State were given specific warnings in 2006, then someone needs to be held responsible, as clearly something pro-actively should have been done.
I think the issue is that it seems (or seemed to the NCAA) that the Canadian package was significantly different from financial aid incentives offered to citizens of other countries. The soccer example would be a red flag, regardless of labels if the school gave a different kind of FA package for Brazilians than, say, Austrians.
The bottom line to the NCAA, IMO, wasn't the label or the terms of the grants, but simply that the grants failed to attract a significant number of non-student athletes, giving them appearance (and de-facto effect) of student athlete financial-aid packages. I believe and I think the NCAA believes as well, that it was NOT the intention of the schools to in any-way-shape-or-form to circumvent the NCAA DIII financial aid policies, but rather the unfortunate result of no one, other than the athletic departments, actively marketing the grant programs, and consequently, little to no student participation beyond the student athletes. Was their negligence on anyone part? I don’t think so, I believe the admissions and financial aid offices, in good faith at compliance, did not consider the student’s athletic participation when making their decisions and in good faith did not even track athletic status of those admitted. While the athletic departments were simply using all available resources in recruiting, not really thinking their actions and success would skew the grant programs so much as to create the situation that has foiled all their well intentioned efforts.
That said; it also appears that sometime, around 2006, the NCAA warned them that their programs might be having a lopsided effect. I am not certain if the warning, however, was directed at them specifically and individually, or rather a general advisory to all DIII programs aimed at all "international financial incentive programs". If Geneseo and Buffalo State were given specific warnings in 2006, then someone needs to be held responsible, as clearly something pro-actively should have been done.
Last edited: