You and Sir Nubs should climb back into your hole. The worst type of fans
Good luck to you and the Utica Pioneers!
I was just pointing out the obvious. Don’t worry about where the Frozen Four will be held - first get there.
You and Sir Nubs should climb back into your hole. The worst type of fans
You can cross Hobart and Curry off that list for sure as their facilities won't meet the standards.
I'm still curious if they'll deem Endicott worthy and who knows what is going on with Utica with the AHL conflicts.
I'm also 95 percent sure that it's supposed to be "highest remaining seed from the East" this year, which would theorectically take Adrian, Point and Augsburg off the list.
I think the real list is:
Utica (maybe?)
Endicott (dicey at best)
Plattsburgh (first no doubt about it they can do it no problem)
Plymouth State (maybe?)
UNE (maybe?)
Norwich (second no doubt about it they can do it)
Why cross off Curry? Their facility is nice. Also has two sheets and plenty of locker rooms. Not sure if they put in a bid to host finals, but would be just as nice as playing at Endicott, Plymouth, or UNE. Personally I like a bigger venue than all of these facilities. Better student-athlete experience to get away from their normal facilities they play in.
Provided the people come out. Nothing worse than watching it played in a “big rink” in front of a bunch of empty seats.
You and Sir Nubs should climb back into your hole. The worst type of fans
I like my bracket too from bracket integrity standpoint...but we all know that means diddly when it comes to this process.
I think Pioneer's bracket will likely get fought HARD by the committee and push back against the NCAA...but if the NCAA rep has their marching orders as if its possible to put a bracket together with only one guaranteed flight, that's the bracket....
I said it before and I’ll say it again. Attendance potential plays a near zero requirement to host a championship weekend at a campus site.
And this year the committee is just going to be happy that anyone can host…
OK - looking for a learning opportunity here. I am not complaining or disputing any data....just trying to understand how this works.
Hobart has a higher (unadjusted) win %, and a higher SOS rating than Utica. Yet, Utica has a higher "adjusted" win %, which seems to be how they are ranked above Hobart. That seems counter-intuitive.
I think I heard once that if a team wins a game against an opponent where that win actually lowers their RPI rating (i.e. very weak or a non-D3 team), the game is removed from the calculations. Is that is what is going on here?
OK - looking for a learning opportunity here. I am not complaining or disputing any data....just trying to understand how this works.
Hobart has a higher (unadjusted) win %, and a higher SOS rating than Utica. Yet, Utica has a higher "adjusted" win %, which seems to be how they are ranked above Hobart. That seems counter-intuitive.
I think I heard once that if a team wins a game against an opponent where that win actually lowers their RPI rating (i.e. very weak or a non-D3 team), the game is removed from the calculations. Is that is what is going on here?
If by chance Endicott and Curry are both in the FF youd think they could find a rink in Eastern Mass thats suitable. Theres only like 15 D1 teams in a 60 mile radius plus the pro teams.
Especially if by some chance Utica went down as well
If by chance Endicott and Curry are both in the FF youd think they could find a rink in Eastern Mass thats suitable. Theres only like 15 D1 teams in a 60 mile radius plus the pro teams.
Especially if by some chance Utica went down as well
Would you provide a link to the SOS numbers? Can't find them. (I miss the KRACH.)
Thanks!
OK - looking for a learning opportunity here. I am not complaining or disputing any data....just trying to understand how this works.
Hobart has a higher (unadjusted) win %, and a higher SOS rating than Utica. Yet, Utica has a higher "adjusted" win %, which seems to be how they are ranked above Hobart. That seems counter-intuitive.
I think I heard once that if a team wins a game against an opponent where that win actually lowers their RPI rating (i.e. very weak or a non-D3 team), the game is removed from the calculations. Is that is what is going on here?
So Utica has played more than half its home games in the AHL rink? That i did not realize.
Stupid rule that will always limit their host options then