What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

She was there longer. The raise was to bring her up to the minimum that the men were making.

my first job i figured i needed X to live. i ask for X + a bit to negotiate. i got X + a - b offered finally and it was fair to me. couple months in i talked to a couple guys who were recently hired and they got more than me because they asked for more and got it. my fault. i had to wait to get a raise after a year. those guys probably went and asked for more than that. happens.

now if your mom was making X and there were 6 other workers, all men, with different starts and beginning salaries and such making X ++.. if it was designed to pay them more than her that blows and is wrong. if it was because they all came in and asked for more and got it and she didn't ask until she found out (like i did) that's a life lesson.

i'm not sure how to read "the minimum" part there... was this like a union shop where the minimum wage was $15/hr for men and she was making $13 or something? that falls under the blows/wrong/bull$hit. but i don't want to assume what 'minimum' means though.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Obama really doesn't want Romney to mention things from earlier in the debate. And his smiling and hoping the moderator bails him out makes him seem nervous and scared of answering a direct question.

He still hasn't answered about why he didn't propose the legislation he promised, despite having two opportunities and saying that he would.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Obama is dominating but Romney just threw a hail mary haymaker that connected on that foreign investment exchange. Obama took it on the chin there.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Another reason I won't vote for either of them: Coming into this country illegally IS A CRIME! You come in the wrong way, you get thrown out. No ifs, ands, or buts.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

No it isn't. It's a civil violation.

But by all means, point me to the section of the federal criminal code that talks about border crossings.

HA! that waste of paper doesn't even outlaw murder!!!! :D
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Another reason I won't vote for either of them: Coming into this country illegally IS A CRIME! You come in the wrong way, you get thrown out. No ifs, ands, or buts.

It's not a crime, it's a civil violation.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Another reason I won't vote for either of them: Coming into this country illegally IS A CRIME! You come in the wrong way, you get thrown out. No ifs, ands, or buts.

Did Chattering Chipmunk say illegals help us "grow."
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Speaking of opportunities for women, don't they outnumber men in college these days?

My chem E class had as many women as men. Our engineering group has at least seven women and five men. And our supervisor is a woman as well. Not even joking, my supervior made a joke today saying we should probably hire another guy to help even things out. :D
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Yea... cause it was a srs link for srs business.

Moron.

ngbbs4f0f1533e18bd.jpg
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

While I tend to agree with Obama, that's a bad answer politically.

Edit: And then Romeny goes full retard by bringing marriage into a gun rights question.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Exactly why the government wants to drug everyone: It's a way to call people mentally ill and get around the second amendment. Chemical warfare, if you ask me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top