Of course Minnesota is innocent. They are all-powerful in college hockey and control everything especially when there is credit to be taken. But when something "bad" happens it's never their fault and they are powerless.
Building this into a David and Goliath championship is a bit of an exaggeration. I still think FSU is a relative underdog, but for those of us who watch college hockey all year, it's obvious that these are two VERY good teams on neutral ice and either one could win it. They both have very different strengths and strategies, but we've seen both types of teams win. I'd give it 60/40 in favor of BC, not the 90/10 I'm seeing in the commentary. I predict FSU plays tough and consistent throughout and that it's a low scoring game. BC needs to bring it or they will lose.
Well that surely sucked. Congrats to BC for taking care of business for pretty much the entire game. Hell of a team that completely earned a victory.
4x4 - stop taking Dirty's bait or at least take it to another thread.
Do you have the ability to not go full-retard when someone takes a shot at the Gophers after a loss?
Especially when the bear likes to talk a lot and rub faces in stuff.
I'm kinda curious to see what happens when the bear is poked. (insert deer joke here)
Will the verbal insults be incendiary?DL, grab another sharp stick!
Well yes. Truthfully I'm just using you as a ploy to argue with the delusional forklympian.
I agree with this part.There is no question Milner played a he!! of a game, but, man, the gophers just flat missed a lot of wide open nets. I had the feeling that the way they were dominating in the first but not scoring if BC came back in the second and got # 2 it would be all over. It's hard to keep big Mo when you are dominating but not scoring and the opponent comes back to get one. I've seen enough of BC handing it to UND, but boy they are fun to watch. They also missed chances to bury pucks, but their passing game in transition and in the slot area is at another level.
Fixed this part.And another thing. There is not much doubt that UND will be licking UMinn's arse next year. Can't wait.
What was with that, anyway? I get that they wanted to check that it wasn't kicked or scored from the crease, but I don't get why it took so long to verify that it was a good goal.
All I should need to mention is ECAC refs Kotyra and Feola. ECAC refs are known to review goals just because they "want to make sure" despite there not being a good reason. Totally kills momentum for the scoring team.
What was with that, anyway? I get that they wanted to check that it wasn't kicked or scored from the crease, but I don't get why it took so long to verify that it was a good goal.
Yeah, that was a pretty easy one to see it was not a kick in... it took way to long for them to decide.
Sadly you are wrong Minnesota is 100% innocent in all of this. They were the last Big Ten school to try to make all of this work. Instead UND and DU got jealous and ran off with their bag of pucks.
I'd give it 60/40 in favor of BC, not the 90/10 I'm seeing in the commentary.
I agree ..........though i have only watched bits and pieces of Ferris. As BC fan, and an older one, i have seen too many go the other way over the years and in the not too distant past ,when we were the better team and lost, to be overconfident