USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
- Thread starter Kepler
- Start date
- Status
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
I just wish for once that one of these clowns would get the terminology correct. I guess my expectations of a Texas A&M grad are too high.
I just wish for once that one of these clowns would get the terminology correct. I guess my expectations of a Texas A&M grad are too high.
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
As a libtard, your prejudices and bigotry led you to certain assumptions about what I HAD to believe about evolution. I have changed no posts. I have, to the best of my knowledge, never posted on this subject previously. An intelligent person would take a lesson here, but since I have serious doubts about your intelligence, I have serious doubts that you'll learn anything. You'll continue on your merry way, snarking, smirking and evidently lying your way through these threads. Some of the other libtards, however, may learn not to be so quick to jump to conclusions. I have posted many times that I'm not a social conservative. Since that fact doesn't fit in your world view, you ignore it. As I say, I have no hope for you.
Thanks board for deleting all old posts so certain posters can change their stances.
As a libtard, your prejudices and bigotry led you to certain assumptions about what I HAD to believe about evolution. I have changed no posts. I have, to the best of my knowledge, never posted on this subject previously. An intelligent person would take a lesson here, but since I have serious doubts about your intelligence, I have serious doubts that you'll learn anything. You'll continue on your merry way, snarking, smirking and evidently lying your way through these threads. Some of the other libtards, however, may learn not to be so quick to jump to conclusions. I have posted many times that I'm not a social conservative. Since that fact doesn't fit in your world view, you ignore it. As I say, I have no hope for you.
Last edited:
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
Are you and Foxton married? if not, I wouldn't let him get away. Both of you are heading for the libtard HOF. I repeat, do you ever offer anything here other than snark and smirk? There are plenty of A&M grads who'd be happy to hire you to mow their lawns.
Are you and Foxton married? if not, I wouldn't let him get away. Both of you are heading for the libtard HOF. I repeat, do you ever offer anything here other than snark and smirk? There are plenty of A&M grads who'd be happy to hire you to mow their lawns.
Last edited:
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
Fact: Perry in this statement misused the term "Scientific Theory".
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/20...ientific-theory-that-has-not-been-proven.html
That furthers the dumbing down of America.
Fact: Perry in this statement misused the term "Scientific Theory".
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/20...ientific-theory-that-has-not-been-proven.html
That furthers the dumbing down of America.
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
Jerk. Do you ever offer anything other than snark or smirk? Ever?
Jerk. Do you ever offer anything other than snark or smirk? Ever?
Almington
Blood Boiling with Rage and Hate
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
I'm confused, he doesn't believe in global warming and his solution is to stop funding research to study it, but wouldn't not studying it make us unable to prove either way who is correct?
Mr. Perry, submitted for your approval: The scientific method
The way that I see things, it comes down to the bigger question of: Is money spent on basic scientific research by the federal government actually money well spent. If the answer is yes, then it doesn't matter if global warming is real because that money should be used to study the natural environment . If the answer is no, then it doesn't matter if global warming is real because that money shouldn't be used to study the natural environment.
The science says X, that goes into the economic and political mechanism of each person and out comes Y of what we should do about it. I'm waiting for the day where a politician says: The science says that global warming is real and significantly caused by humans, but I don't think that doing anything to mitigate the impact is in out current economic interest.
I'm confused, he doesn't believe in global warming and his solution is to stop funding research to study it, but wouldn't not studying it make us unable to prove either way who is correct?
Mr. Perry, submitted for your approval: The scientific method
The way that I see things, it comes down to the bigger question of: Is money spent on basic scientific research by the federal government actually money well spent. If the answer is yes, then it doesn't matter if global warming is real because that money should be used to study the natural environment . If the answer is no, then it doesn't matter if global warming is real because that money shouldn't be used to study the natural environment.
The science says X, that goes into the economic and political mechanism of each person and out comes Y of what we should do about it. I'm waiting for the day where a politician says: The science says that global warming is real and significantly caused by humans, but I don't think that doing anything to mitigate the impact is in out current economic interest.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
Yes, cause history is so much more important to get right than science.
Yes, cause history is so much more important to get right than science.
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
No, but some aspects of science are open to debate. Franklin Roosevelt being on TV as president in 1929 isn't, at least in my book. But, hey, the way they rewrite history now, maybe I'm just old-fashioned.
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
The problem is a lot of "scientists" investigating this matter apparantly put their thumbs on the scale. What do we do about that?
The problem is a lot of "scientists" investigating this matter apparantly put their thumbs on the scale. What do we do about that?
Last edited:
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
People in all 57 states would agree.
People in all 57 states would agree.
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
Those people that care about that 3-letter word, "jobs."
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
IMO the subtle impact on evolution/ID issue is far greater than it is given credit for.
Of course there's the issue on the education budget and science education in particular. But the potential damage on children downplaying the importance of science and being drawn into other professions could be profound. The guy who was to discover the cure for cancer might instead end up getting a degree in philosophy.
And this in the US, a country where the deteriorating list of competitve advantages over Asia leaves us with primarly innovation.
IMO the subtle impact on evolution/ID issue is far greater than it is given credit for.
Of course there's the issue on the education budget and science education in particular. But the potential damage on children downplaying the importance of science and being drawn into other professions could be profound. The guy who was to discover the cure for cancer might instead end up getting a degree in philosophy.
And this in the US, a country where the deteriorating list of competitve advantages over Asia leaves us with primarly innovation.
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
Racist. Next thing we know, you're gonna be talking about a "black cloud" of debt hanging over the nation. And we all know what you'd really mean by that.
Racist. Next thing we know, you're gonna be talking about a "black cloud" of debt hanging over the nation. And we all know what you'd really mean by that.
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
If only we were in the black. In the red is the more applicable color.
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
You're right to be concerned about these matters, I am. And while I disagree with Perry in his outlook, these issues are primarily local. And not especially "presidential." Obama's election (or re-election) hasn't and won't do anything to overcome resistance to evolution in certain parts of the country. Besides, given the ways things are going, how long do you suppose it will be that there are demands we teach the Islamic view (assuming there is one) of creation in public schools? After all, we've gotta be balanced.
You're right to be concerned about these matters, I am. And while I disagree with Perry in his outlook, these issues are primarily local. And not especially "presidential." Obama's election (or re-election) hasn't and won't do anything to overcome resistance to evolution in certain parts of the country. Besides, given the ways things are going, how long do you suppose it will be that there are demands we teach the Islamic view (assuming there is one) of creation in public schools? After all, we've gotta be balanced.
Last edited:
Foxton
Banned
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
40 minutes of pointing out things Ron Paul has done and would like to do (links to sources in the youtube info)
<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aQSKv5RzlYs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
40 minutes of pointing out things Ron Paul has done and would like to do (links to sources in the youtube info)
<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aQSKv5RzlYs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
Why would anyone want to watch some guy in his parents' basement talk about Ron Paul for 40 minutes?
Why would anyone want to watch some guy in his parents' basement talk about Ron Paul for 40 minutes?
Slap Shot
I got nothing
Re: 2012 Elections Part I: All Politics is Yokel
Isn't that what we get every time dmxwhatever posts?
(I kid)
Isn't that what we get every time dmxwhatever posts?
(I kid)
- Status