Jimjamesak
Already insane, UAA making it worse
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio
DC United beats Real Salt Lake in the US Open Cup final.
DC United beats Real Salt Lake in the US Open Cup final.
Wow. When Arsenal are clicking, they are really fun to watch. They spend a bit too much time each game coasting, and defense is still an adventure, but during that 15 - 20 minutes each game this season when they decide to exert maximum effort, they are so dynamic and fluid.
I don't know how it came about, but I started watching English soccer on TV during the 2004 "Invincibles" run to an undefeated season. Ironically, their last major win. I've read that Real Madrid sold Ozul to Arsenal partly out of spite at Tottenham for jerking around the Gareth Bale transfer so long. So far Ozul is definitely proving to be an immediate impact.
It'll all turn out OK as long as we move the World Cup to the winter, I'm certain.
/FIFA
FIFA announced on Friday that the top seven teams in the global rankings from October — along with the host nation — will serve as the top seeds in the World Cup next summer in Brazil.
The rankings are set to be released on Oct. 17 and, despite their recent success in the CONCACAF Hexagonal round, it’s highly unlikely the US national team will vault from their current spot (No. 13) to a spot in the top seven and earn their first-ever seed in the tournament.
The announcement means that the seeds could instead go to teams who did not appear in the 2010 World Cup — Belgium seem primed for a spot after failing to qualify for South Africa or Germany in 2006, while Colombia could be seeded in their first appearance since 1994 – while traditional powers like England, Portugal or even 2010 runners-up the Netherlands could miss out.
Currently, the top seven teams are Spain, Argentina, Germany, Italy, Colombia, Belgium and Uruguay. Brazil – currently ranked No. 8 – get an automatic seed.
Well that'll make people happy... Oh wait...
Well that'll make people happy... Oh wait...
The "top seven plus hosts get seeds" thing seemed fairly obvious that it was going to happen. Toward the end they bury one line:
The other draw pots will be determined by "geographic and sports criteria.
With most organizations, you'd assume that they want to not have too many teams from any one federation in any one group, and that the stronger and weaker teams are relatively equally distributed. But this is FIFA, so it probably means that they intend to put the US in the Grupo del Morte.The "top seven plus hosts get seeds" thing seemed fairly obvious that it was going to happen. Toward the end they bury one line:
Any more detail there? Pretty poor reporting IMO, especially given that the whole purpose of writing the article seemed to be to point out that the USA wasn't going to be a top 8 seed.
It would be a honor. We've never been in that group.With most organizations, you'd assume that they want to not have too many teams from any one federation in any one group, and that the stronger and weaker teams are relatively equally distributed. But this is FIFA, so it probably means that they intend to put the US in the Grupo del Morte.
It would be a honor. We've never been in that group.
Normally we're a mid major who once in a while upsets the BCS schools. Mid majors are not assigned to the Grupo.
Was going to say, don't recall the US being in a terribly hard group in recent memory.
some day, one hopes, the rest of the world will say any pool that includes the US is such a group.it probably means that they intend to put the US in the Grupo del Morte.
The "top seven plus hosts get seeds" thing seemed fairly obvious that it was going to happen.
Toward the end they bury one line:
Any more detail there? Pretty poor reporting IMO, especially given that the whole purpose of writing the article seemed to be to point out that the USA wasn't going to be a top 8 seed.
Seems obvious to me because to do otherwise would be to admit that the FIFA rankings are flawed, and FIFA is loath to ever admit that they've been wrong about anything.It wasn't at all obvious that they would use just the FIFA rankings, because it was reasonable to suppose that FIFA would prefer not to have Belgium and Colombia seeded.
Seems obvious to me because to do otherwise would be to admit that the FIFA rankings are flawed, and FIFA is loath to ever admit that they've been wrong about anything.
Huh, I thought that they had previously used straight FIFA rankings, but I guess my recollection was off. I would tend to feel like in the deluded universe inside FIFA's collective brain where they don't realize that the FIFA rankings aren't all that good, it would in turn make internal logical sense just to use those rankings rather than fudge them further. In the real world, of course, we know that they'll fudge them to get a result they want, but I don't think there's anything "embarrassing", per se, about seeds going to teams that haven't been historically strong but are right now, like there was with the France thing.They used to use a composite of the FIFA rankings and past WC performance, and I think that would be a reasonable alternative that would not necessarily amount to an admission of flaws in the FIFA rankings—especially since it looks as though they went to the present system in the first place to avoid having France be seeded in the wake of the Henry handling scandal.