Turn off fox news.I would love to hear what you pro-union people suggest should be done to solve all these budget problems, seriously? Turn on the news and all that you see is that cities and towns from coast to coast are on the brink of bankruptcy under the crushing pressure of skyrocketing public employee, pay, pensions, healthcare costs, benefits, etc. This isn't a myth, it's black and white - and Stockton, CA is next. So all kidding aside, when town finance managers insist that they just cannot keep up with these rising costs, what do you suggest? I suppose the only thing you CAN suggest is raise taxes, but get real, that's pretty darn selfish. So again, what's the fix? I'm all ears?
Steve
(a) Anyway to disable autoplay?
(b) Was that in Madison?
Except that's what Walker did - "Public unions should have no collective bargaining rights except for COLA's up to the inflation level." Oh, and police and firefighters? By all means, go ahead and unionize since you normally vote Republican.
No right to bargain on salary increases past inflation. No right to bargain on benefits, pension, or anything else.
Seems like opposition to the notion that "unions should have bargaining rights" to me.
Turn off fox news.
I would love to hear what you pro-union people suggest should be done to solve all these budget problems, seriously?
A trick question? US taxpayers are still working on paying half of the world's military budget...and have seen an 81% increase in military spending since 2001.
Meanwhile the US worker is losing to its overseas competitors at the cost of the country's welfare, its ability to pay its debt and yes, covering its massive Dept of Defense budget which is about 10 times that of the Dept of Education.
Must be a trick question.
Meanwhile the US worker is losing to its overseas competitors
Of course, the problems states and municipalities have in meeting their obligations to greedy employee unions are caused by defense spending.
You do understand why we are losing jobs to foreign countries right?
Problem is that state budgets are way down relative to federal budgets...ie the states are getting starved relative to the federal government. But we should futher cut state spending and keep the growing federal budget in tact?
So we taxpayers should continue to want to pay nearly half the world's military budget...while sacrificing an education budget that is already a tenth of the size...just because we don't know how to transfer funds between federal and state levels? Really?
Except that like FDR and others, I was making the distinction between public employees and free market employees unionizing, an important part of my point (and the distinction is important to understand regarding Walker's reforms as well). I'm all for unions. Just not ones that are allowed to rule over the rest of us citizens without any checks or balances.
...is that they raided the pension funds without any plan or desire to pay it back. THey simply kicked that can down the road for the last 30 years. And now employees who earned said pensions are boned.Of course, the problems states and municipalities have in meeting their obligations to greedy employee unions
...is that they raided the pension funds without any plan or desire to pay it back. THey simply kicked that can down the road for the last 30 years. And now employees who earned said pensions are boned.
Defense is a federal responsibility and has nothing whatsoever to do with states and municipalities finding themselves between a rock and a hard place (cutting services or raising taxes) to meet the obligations they've stupidly taken on to meet the demands of greedy employee unions.
If you want to discuss defense spending then please do so in a way that comports with reality. Don't just riffle through your supply of bumper stickers to find one that makes your "point." Start with His Doneness spending about a trillion bucks to provide "shovel ready" jobs to his union goon supporters. The phrase "jobs created or saved" is one of the most dishonest in recent decades. Just like his phony manipulation of demand with "cash for clunkers."
States and municipalities got themselves into this mess by repeatedly caving in to unions when times were good. Well, the times aren't so good anymore, but the states and municipalities still have trillions of dollars in obligations to their employees (and those obligations are growing every day) even as their revenues decline. Blame it on Donald Rumsfeld if it makes you feel better. But folks all across this nation, and in liberal Wisconsin, are beginning to come to the realization that we can't sustain this madness any more. Most Americans would be willing to pay more in taxes to maintain government services, but not the lifestyles and gold plated benefit plans of overpaid employees.
I would love to hear what you pro-union people suggest should be done to solve all these budget problems, seriously? Turn on the news and all that you see is that cities and towns from coast to coast are on the brink of bankruptcy under the crushing pressure of skyrocketing public employee, pay, pensions, healthcare costs, benefits, etc. This isn't a myth, it's black and white - and Stockton, CA is next. So all kidding aside, when town finance managers insist that they just cannot keep up with these rising costs, what do you suggest? I suppose the only thing you CAN suggest is raise taxes, but get real, that's pretty darn selfish. So again, what's the fix? I'm all ears?
Ummm...the point was how else to cut government spending. I answered that question.
I've no interest in chasing you on your tirade...to cut some government services, while protecting others you seem to prefer.
States and municipalities got themselves into this mess by repeatedly caving in to unions when times were good.
The problem here is that you tied defense spending into it and have failed to explain what that possibly has to do with state budgets.