Re: Who will be the 7th member of the Big Ten Hockey Conference?
I don't think UConn has been in the college world series lately.
I don't think UConn has been in the college world series lately.
For a second or two, I thought you were asking for my opinion on the topic, then I realized you were probably referring to legendary blues artist BB King.
We have not been in the College World Series since 1979. But our coach is not bad. Certainly did make questionable moves this past season.I don't think UConn has been in the college world series lately.
We're talking about net revenue producing sports, particularly those that have TV viewers associated with them. That's why the discussion is relevant. Whom the B1G grabs next is not going to have anything to do with college hockey other than as a byproduct.What is something that isn't relevant on this website?
That about sums up summer on a hockey board.Yep, but this is a college hockey message bored.![]()
As opposed to the rest of us who had forgotten about it because it's women's basketball...Hats off to all you men's hockey fans who remembered that Rutgers women won in BB along with the Imus incident in 2007. Very impressed. I had certainly forgotten all about that particularly since Rutgers has done nothing in WBB since.
As opposed to the rest of us who had forgotten about it because it's women's basketball...
This is really still going? Wow.
I have a feeling this thread will continue until every poster is thoroughly convinced that Connecticut would be a viable, logical B1G addition.
I have a feeling this thread will continue until every poster is thoroughly convinced that Connecticut would be a viable, logical B1G addition.
No, it'll close at 1000 posts way before that.I have a feeling this thread will continue until every poster is thoroughly convinced that Connecticut would be a viable, logical B1G addition.
Yeah, but some Area Clown will start a part 2 of this thread.No, it'll close at 1000 posts way before that.
"Big Ten Conference still thinking about expanding? Report hints it may be coming"I have a feeling this thread will continue until every poster is thoroughly convinced that Connecticut would be a viable, logical B1G addition.
New markets? What are they still missing at this point, given that PSU, Maryland, and Rutgers are about as good as it gets for Philly, DC, and NYC? Boston? Atlanta? Houston (Rice anyone"Big Ten Conference still thinking about expanding? Report hints it may be coming"
http://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/i..._expanding_report_hints_it_may_be_coming.html
"The Big Ten is expected to begin negotiations on a new deal in 2014 and grabbing two more universities — and television markets — would give the league added leverage."
Hmmmmmmm.
If the goal is the Bos-Wash megalopolis, the area between Boston and New York City is still not included in the B1G. Many, many, influential schools in that area. Look up the "Knowledge Corridor". UVA is also associated with the megalopolis. It has been stated before by Delany that the East Coast is still a priority.New markets? What are they still missing at this point, given that PSU, Maryland, and Rutgers are about as good as it gets for Philly, DC, and NYC? Boston? Atlanta? Houston (Rice anyone)? LA?
You might also say "CT and whatever piece of NYC it carries." NJ = 8.8M people, CT = 3.6M, a rather large percentage of whom are NYC refugees with no allegiance to CT at all - they just consider themselves to be New Yorkers with a lawn. There's no college that can fully deliver the NYC market, and I think they already have the best choice locked up (Rutgers). I honestly think they'd get more eyeballs by taking a larger slice of a smaller market (e.g. Vanderbilt in Nashville, Georgia Tech in Atlanta, both AAU members) than by adding the tiny slice of NYC that UConn would deliver.Southwest CT is also part of the New York TV market. The people there certainly are not Rutgers fans. Rutgers was added to deliver NJ and whatever piece of NYC it carries.
Indeed.Anyhow, time shall tell how it all turns out.
I've been in Fairfield County for most of my life. I never heard anyone say they are New Yorkers with a lawn. The difference between UConn, Vanderbilt and Georgia Tech is UConn has no real in-state competition when it comes to sports other than hockey. Tennessee and Georgia take up a large percentage of the markets shared with the other schools you mentioned. I am well aware NYC is a divided market. UConn and Rutgers are still the FBS schools closest to NYC, besides Army. We are even establishing pipelines for football recruiting in NYC. We do have a following for basketball in New York City, New York state and elsewhere in New England.You might also say "CT and whatever piece of NYC it carries." NJ = 8.8M people, CT = 3.6M, a rather large percentage of whom are NYC refugees with no allegiance to CT at all - they just consider themselves to be New Yorkers with a lawn. There's no college that can fully deliver the NYC market, and I think they already have the best choice locked up (Rutgers). I honestly think they'd get more eyeballs by taking a larger slice of a smaller market (e.g. Vanderbilt in Nashville, Georgia Tech in Atlanta, both AAU members) than by adding the tiny slice of NYC that UConn would deliver.