Re: What team ends the Minnesota winning streak?
As a Gopher fan, might we better off losing this game now vs one later on? Like the playoffs? Hope we can run the table but would rather not give team extra incentive.
No. Unless you can demonstrate how losing now would mean that the Gophers are less likely to lose come playoff time, I don't think so. There's nothing to say that once Minnesota loses they won't then play .500 hockey the rest of the way. Best to get all of the wins possible in the meantime and increase the chances of playing come national tournament time.
In rational, quantitative terms, ARM is clearly correct. No sane coach is going to tell his team to tank a game to get a winning streak out of the way.
And yet, Call It's point is ignored at one's own peril. Motivation and Momentum are very difficult to quantify. Still, they're very real factors. To demand that they be "demonstrated" is to stack the deck a bit.
I can think of countless hockey examples where a team with a high ranking and/or a win streak plays a bit tentatively, and drops a game to a motivated underdog playing with "nothing to lose." Again, it's tough to
prove that motivation was the key difference, but it seems clear to me that this happens with some regularity. What does Call It want? To avoid that scenario next March. Can't fault a fan for that, right?
Taking the topic a step beyond the original exchange, it could be argued that motivated underdogs tend to be less successful in Women's D-1 Hockey than at other levels of our sport. IMHO, that could very well be the case. If so,
why would be a very interesting question. But again, proof is difficult.
Thoughts?