pokechecker
Banned
Re: What team ends the Minnesota winning streak?
I recall joking about playing poorly one day to lull the opposition into thinking they didn't have to play 100% the next game, and getting your butt handed on a platter was a good way to motivate for the next game, but I doubt UND coaches actually implemented that as their strategy.
Seriously, what game plan did they implement?
and when did the stifling defense happen?
it's been nearly 20 years since I coached but it appeared to me their 2-1-2, if it was intended to force the MN defenders into bad passes to the forwards, or to mishandle the puck was ineffective (OK, one time one of the defenders attempted a deke when there was nobody to back them up and got the puck stolen, but it resulted in nothing), Kudos to Ramsey, McMillan, and Gillanders for their play in carrying it near the blue line (and occasionally deeper) and delivering a crisp accurate pass to the MN forwards who for the most part were able to gain the UND zone. Maybe your idea of a stifling defense is one that doesn't give up a goal irrespective of what happens? Perhaps like the WCHA POTW award you only saw the stats?
In fact one of the Gophers hit the pipe the first period, McMillan hit the top pipe and the puck nearly went in, and in the 3rd she had the upper right corner nailed except her shot sailed a bit high. Yes, I know, wouldda, coulda, shoulda. But I really do question if you were at the same game. yes, UND were tenacious in the offensive zone in the first period, at least up until a Gopher gained possesion of the puck, then nearly every time the puck went to one of the veteran Defenders who proceeded to skate out of the zone, Ramsey was especially effective at this. How can anyone call that a stifling defense? the Gophers simply failed to convert on their chances, while the Fighting Sioux did. It didn't help that one of the Fighting Sioux goals was the result of one of the Gophers kicking the puck away from Leveille to Layla Marvin (all alone with 2 or was it 3 Gophers) who cashed it in.
Lexie Shaw looked pretty shaky to me the first period, why the Gophers didn't pepper her with shots is beyond me. Certainly having Menefee in the game would have helped (if you ask why, review Wolfe's 2 goals the previous day, never a bad idea for the off wing to be near the empty goalmouth as the puck arrives on net)
No, this isn't sour grapes, just fact.
if it's too much for you ( not referring to D2D here, but rather the Fighting Squaw fans) go to Facebook or Twitter and have your fun there (or use the ignore feature, you'll do us both a favor)
Give credit to North Dakota for coming out and dominating the Gophers in the first period. I don't recall exactly at what point the Gophers got their first shot on goal, but it took a very long time. Meanwhile, UND not only created and took advantage of their offensive opportunities but they played stifling defense, not allowing the home team practically any time and space whatsoever. Also have to give credit to their coaches for setting up a great game plan.
I recall joking about playing poorly one day to lull the opposition into thinking they didn't have to play 100% the next game, and getting your butt handed on a platter was a good way to motivate for the next game, but I doubt UND coaches actually implemented that as their strategy.
Seriously, what game plan did they implement?
and when did the stifling defense happen?
it's been nearly 20 years since I coached but it appeared to me their 2-1-2, if it was intended to force the MN defenders into bad passes to the forwards, or to mishandle the puck was ineffective (OK, one time one of the defenders attempted a deke when there was nobody to back them up and got the puck stolen, but it resulted in nothing), Kudos to Ramsey, McMillan, and Gillanders for their play in carrying it near the blue line (and occasionally deeper) and delivering a crisp accurate pass to the MN forwards who for the most part were able to gain the UND zone. Maybe your idea of a stifling defense is one that doesn't give up a goal irrespective of what happens? Perhaps like the WCHA POTW award you only saw the stats?
In fact one of the Gophers hit the pipe the first period, McMillan hit the top pipe and the puck nearly went in, and in the 3rd she had the upper right corner nailed except her shot sailed a bit high. Yes, I know, wouldda, coulda, shoulda. But I really do question if you were at the same game. yes, UND were tenacious in the offensive zone in the first period, at least up until a Gopher gained possesion of the puck, then nearly every time the puck went to one of the veteran Defenders who proceeded to skate out of the zone, Ramsey was especially effective at this. How can anyone call that a stifling defense? the Gophers simply failed to convert on their chances, while the Fighting Sioux did. It didn't help that one of the Fighting Sioux goals was the result of one of the Gophers kicking the puck away from Leveille to Layla Marvin (all alone with 2 or was it 3 Gophers) who cashed it in.
Lexie Shaw looked pretty shaky to me the first period, why the Gophers didn't pepper her with shots is beyond me. Certainly having Menefee in the game would have helped (if you ask why, review Wolfe's 2 goals the previous day, never a bad idea for the off wing to be near the empty goalmouth as the puck arrives on net)
No, this isn't sour grapes, just fact.
if it's too much for you ( not referring to D2D here, but rather the Fighting Squaw fans) go to Facebook or Twitter and have your fun there (or use the ignore feature, you'll do us both a favor)
Last edited: