What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

sorry homebro
sorry homebro
don't steal my word, wordthief
I'm not your guy, buddy.
I'm not your buddy, fwiend.
I'm not your fwiend, guy.
I'm not your guy, buddy.
I'm not your buddy, fwiend.
I'm not your fwiend, guy.
I'm not your guy, buddy.
I'm not your buddy, fwiend.
I'm not your fwiend, guy.
I'm not your guy, buddy.
I'm not your buddy, fwiend.
I'm not your fwiend, guy.
I'm not your guy, buddy.
I'm not your buddy, fwiend.
I'm not your fwiend, guy.
...
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

If only it were possible for both teams to get no points out of this. That would be great.
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

It's worth mentioning that the winner of this 2-game series gets the same award that UVM got for making the Frozen Four:

PARTICIPANT1.jpg
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

I'll take last year all over again :D That would put Vermont in the frozen four of the tournament and Lowell missing out as usual. Just like it should be. And will be. :)

alll I hear is whining... you Vermonters are a really sad lot.
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

I'm going to speak for Lowell fans: We know the team has underperformed this season and we admit that.

We are sick and tired of you ganja smoking, birkenstock wearing hippies from Canada (I mean Burlington) giving us crap about your "superior" hockey program.

Where has that been stated on this thread?
So because you are delusional and insecure about your team, thinking every team's fan base thinks there team is superior you guys resort to name calling? Nice, glad this is college hockey and not high school hockey.
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

i can for sure say this: 4th place ≠ 7th place. sorry homebro

Who is in 7th place?

UML stand one spot above UVM in the HE standings, I wouldn't say either team is head and shoulders above the other. And given UVM is 12th in the PWR versus 22(?) I would say that makes them slightly better.

You guys really do have some type of inferiority complex, the only people on this thread that hasn't said they are close teams are the UML fans. Which actually was the same in the offseason thread.

You guys have a good team. You do not suck, you are not a great team. But, a good team.
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

alll I hear is whining... you Vermonters are a really sad lot.

There are no Vermonters that are UML fans on this blog, and you guys are the only ones whining........

UVM fans know exactly where we are in the standings, why we are there and accept it for what it is.
UML fans are still in fantasy land thinking somehow that 22 in the PWR and in a position to finish anywhere from 4th to 9th means they are the greatest team in the country that has just for some reason has underachieved all season long.

Funny thing is the most likely scenario is a split and a replay the following weekend. But no of course according to UML fans they will definitely sweep.......at home (where UVM is 4-0-0 in the last 3 seasons). Good luck with that.
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

UML stand one spot above UVM in the HE standings, I wouldn't say either team is head and shoulders above the other. And given UVM is 12th in the PWR versus 22(?) I would say that makes them slightly better.

You keep quoting the PWR as if it's the be-all, end-all deciding factor in who is the better team right now. It's only valid on Selection Sunday. Nobody cares where you stand in the PWR on March 3, it only matters on March 21.

If it does mean so much to you though, then why is it that you weren't quoting it much 2 weeks ago when you dropped from 9th to 21st because of 1 loss?
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

You keep quoting the PWR as if it's the be-all, end-all deciding factor in who is the better team right now. It's only valid on Selection Sunday. Nobody cares where you stand in the PWR on March 3, it only matters on March 21.

If it does mean so much to you though, then why is it that you weren't quoting it much 2 weeks ago when you dropped from 9th to 21st because of 1 loss?

Shhhhh... I want them thinking that this weekend matters just as much as they claimed that the Quarterfinals meant last year... QF series in the end turned out to mean nothing at all to Vermont. So, this weekend, I figure that this series means nothing at all to them.
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

You keep quoting the PWR as if it's the be-all, end-all deciding factor in who is the better team right now. It's only valid on Selection Sunday. Nobody cares where you stand in the PWR on March 3, it only matters on March 21.

If it does mean so much to you though, then why is it that you weren't quoting it much 2 weeks ago when you dropped from 9th to 21st because of 1 loss?

If you like I can quote the polls where UVM is 16th and UML is unranked.....is that better.

FYI, I wasn't quoting it 2 weeks ago because UNH Fans are not a bunch of insecure flamers that need to make stupid asnine remarks.
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

Shhhhh... I want them thinking that this weekend matters just as much as they claimed that the Quarterfinals meant last year... QF series in the end turned out to mean nothing at all to Vermont. So, this weekend, I figure that this series means nothing at all to them.

I love you guys.....always a good laugh.

Already on this thread we have :

UML FANS : Your FF doesn't matter only the present matters ( because UML is a point up) Yup, I agree only the present matters and as of today UML is one point up heading into a two game set that will decide home ice from playoff bystander at an arena where UML is 0-4-0 against UVM in the past 3 seasons. That's what matters.

UML FANS: Only last years QF's matter (because UML swept) The QF's matter in that it ended UVM's HE season and lit a fire under their azz helping them make it to the FF. We UVM fans owe you guys a debt of gratitude. But much like last year should UVM say lose in the QF's to UML they still may make the NCAA's and UML still will not.

UML FANS: 3/3/2010 doesn't matter only 3/21/2010 (because UML is ranked lower) Of couse 3/21/2010 doesn't matter either, at least to UML because you guys ain't winning the HE Championship and you ain't getting an at large bid. So in essence neither 3-3 nor 3-21 matter for you guys. On the other hand 3-8 and 3-9 are huge, it could mean the end of your season, it could mean a home ice berth, but the biggest implications are that you may not be a TUC.



But, I am still a little sure what it is you guys consider to be the true test? What is it that truly matters when looking at two teams?
Maybe you guys can stick your heads together (that's figurative) and come up with what actually matters?
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

All I know is you've been running your mouth off since before that QF series and you haven't stopped since. I remember when that series was important... and as soon as the final whistle blew that series became so very unimportant in the minds of Vermont fans.

This is about you... Vermont fans justifying themselves on whatever they can and not admitting what happened. I don't think any of would fail to acknowledge that Vermont did certain things last year. UVMers on the other hand, have a hard time admitting that Vermont did certain things last year.

edit: every other team in the league would cop to the importance of losing the QF series... you lot STILL haven't.
 
Last edited:
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

All I know is you've been running your mouth off since before that QF series and you haven't stopped since. I remember when that series was important... and as soon as the final whistle blew that series became so very unimportant in the minds of Vermont fans.
FYI, judging by posts counts it would appear you do a fair amount of running off at the mouth yourself.


Ok since I know this is hard for you let me work you through it. Before the series it was important. It meant a trip to the garden and may have had a significant impact on the PWR, in essence deciding UVM's NCAA fate. After the QF's it became clear that they were still in the NCAA's and so yes some of the importance of the series was lost. UML came to UVM and played a heck of a series and beat UVM. I will not cover this again as it is seriously starting to border on absurd, but UML has a good team, above average. Almost no one is disputing that. You guys need to take the chip off your should, no one is saying UML sucks and that what you keep making this about.


This is about you... Vermont fans justifying themselves on whatever they can and not admitting what happened. I don't think any of would fail to acknowledge that Vermont did certain things last year. UVMers on the other hand, have a hard time admitting that Vermont did certain things last year.

Not in the least, it's about responding to the asnine statments by some UML posters that want to make it out that UML is undefeatable and UVM is the red headed step child. Its not the case. UVM had a good season last year despite losing the QF's to a hungry UML team. They may get a chance to return the favor this season, not because either of them are great or either of them suck but because they are in fact very similar.

Seriously, you guys need to drop the inferiority complex.
 
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

let's see how good your PWR is when you don't even make your own conference tournament.
 
Last edited:
Re: UVM at Lowell 3/5 & 3/6

let's see how good your PWR is when you don't even make your own conference tournament.

You are a dumbazz.......the PWR is one of several ways to measure the strength of a team. They are in fact a very important one. You can put them down if you like, but we could compare RPI if you want, or Polls, or heck even HE standings. They all support the same statement that UVM and UML are very evenly matched teams.

The conference tourney part of your statement is almost absurd, UVM missing it is about as likely as UML missing it. While a possibility its a long shot. But hey, we will see........maybe you will look like a genius for the first time in your life.
 
Back
Top