bigblue_dl
Armed
Re: Unrest in Egypt
One is now the fullback for the Packers.What do they want to be when they grow up?
One is now the fullback for the Packers.What do they want to be when they grow up?
It is now clear to all that the modern, post-colonial Arab state has failed miserably, even in what it believed it was best at: Maintaining security and stability. Over the decades, Arab interior ministers and police chiefs devoted enormous resources and expertise to monitoring and spying on their own people. Yet now, the security machineries in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya have disintegrated in short order, while the rest of the authoritarian and repressive regimes in the region can see the writing on the wall.
These revolutions have exposed not just the failure of traditional politicians but also the moral, political and economic bankruptcy of the old Arab elites. Those elites not only attempted to control their own people, but also sought to shape and taint the views of news media in the region and across the world.
Indeed, it should surprise no one that so many Western analysts, researchers, journalists and government experts failed to recognise the obvious signs of Arab youth movements that would soon erupt into revolutions capable of bringing down some of the most pro-Western regimes in the Middle East. That failure has exposed a profound lack of understanding in the West of Arab reality.
US and European allies, supporters and business partners of the Arab regimes persistently preferred to deal with leaders who were entirely unrepresentative of the new generation. They were detached from the emerging reality and had no way to engage with the social forces that now matter. It is the growing periphery of the Arab world - the masses at its margins, not its feeble and decaying centre - that is shaping the future of the region.
The Arab League moves towards supporting the protesters' call for a no fly zone. Meanwhile, Gaddafi calls down more air raids on the opposition's cities. Tripoli has a lot of damage and many skilled people have fled.
I've been pretty impressed by the Arab Leagues stance on all this. They have been about as tough on Gaddafi as any international body...and remember they consist of many nations that have strongmen and are at risk of uprisings themselves.
Also heard that Europe can't even get a meeting on the agenda to discuss a no-fly zone until the end of the month. Dont' hold your breath.
I think the happiest people about that are the Europeans.
It's a terrible idea for the west to move anything more provocative than a UN inspector into Libya. Gadaffi's best chance is to appeal to the (not unreasonable) native suspicion of our motives. All we need is a repeat of Iraq, with military units hustling to protect oil installations while people die in the streets. Instant terrorist insurgency.
Tough quiz. How do you really tell the difference between them?
I've clearly got to study up on my nutters. I only got 4 right.
I've clearly got to study up on my nutters. I only got 4 right.
I got 9 right...
.Charlie Brown said:I got a rock
Al Jazeera said the chairman of the rebels' National Libyan Council, Mustafa Abdel Jalil, rejected any talks with Gaddafi.
The rebels, armed with rocket launchers, anti-aircraft guns and tanks, called Wednesday for U.N.-backed air strikes on foreign mercenaries it said were fighting for Gaddafi.
Opposition activists called for a no-fly zone, echoing a demand by Libya's deputy U.N. envoy, who now opposes Gaddafi.
"Bring Bush! Make a no fly zone, bomb the planes," shouted soldier-turned-rebel Nasr Ali, referring to a no-fly zone imposed on Iraq in 1991 by then U.S. President George Bush.
Does anyone else find it delightfully ironic that people from the "Middle East" (not really) are now begging for one of the Bushes? Because I do.
Perhaps we should consider a theory that no one, from what I have been able to gather, has yet advanced in quite the form in which I shall present it. While it is admittedly speculative, it is not for that either implausible or unreasonable: it is not a position that I defend as much as a line of inquiry that there may be some profit in exploring. The thesis is that our enemies in the Islamic world certainly hated Bush, but they hate Obama even more, for while Bush was an infidel, Obama is something worse: an apostate.
Could the reason have more to do with the current occupant of the White House?
(Likud's worst nightmare is a rational, democratic Arab world.
That'll happen as soon as all religion is eliminated worldwide.
Honk if you saw this coming.
Yemen makes Somalia look like a stable state. I'm just surprised it took this long to get ugly.