REF - I am sorry to say this is a stupidly simple question to answer. It has been answered here a number of times, but not necessarily in a straight line. Maine identified and hired the right guy. As to getting the Nadeau brothers, yup that was fortunate and he made sure they didn't get away, got a good amount of talent to put around them and can clearly coach the team up.
This is a simple story -
Coach A. Played 4 years at the school. Spent 9 years kicking around AHL/ECHL. Spent 8 years kicking around pro hockey in Europe. Assistant coached 4 years - Coached 2 years at (never done anything) Brown and 2 years at (never done anything) Uconn.
Coach B. Played 4 years of college hockey. Assistant coached for 14 years. 4 stops under 3 different head coaches. Each stop was a turn around. All 4 made the NCAAs in year 3 of the turn around. 3 of the 4 won it all in year 5 or 6 of the turn around. Bounced around a bit, typically only stayed 3 years so was only present for one title.
Which coach looks better to hire to turn a program around?
P.S. Coach Barr is right on schedule, will make the NCAAs in year 3. And as long as Maine isn't Western Michigan (and if they can get the Nadeau brothers to stick 3 years) well maybe year 5 will be super special.