USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
- Thread starter bigeasy29
- Start date
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
So is he going to be fulltime with Phantoms.
So is he going to be fulltime with Phantoms.
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
no he's off their roster because the flyers signed sebastian caron today and sent down duschene to make room. hutton was the only goalie they had that wasn't actually under contract so he's the one they released.
also nick schaus is indeed playing for worcester tonight
no he's off their roster because the flyers signed sebastian caron today and sent down duschene to make room. hutton was the only goalie they had that wasn't actually under contract so he's the one they released.
also nick schaus is indeed playing for worcester tonight
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
http://www.providencebruins.com/View/PressReleases/530
My friend showed me this
"The Red Hawks' campaign ended on March 14 in the Hockey East Quarterfinals at the hands of the Maine Black Bears."
Nice of them to get it wrong...We are not Miami Ohio.
http://www.providencebruins.com/View/PressReleases/530
My friend showed me this
"The Red Hawks' campaign ended on March 14 in the Hockey East Quarterfinals at the hands of the Maine Black Bears."
Nice of them to get it wrong...We are not Miami Ohio.
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
BTW, I know some of you aren't fans of Chaz, but he had some interesting stats posted on the Sun Blog.
That sucks, here's hoping he gets a shot elsewhere.
BTW, I know some of you aren't fans of Chaz, but he had some interesting stats posted on the Sun Blog.
Last edited:
goaltendah
New member
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
Dont know what could come out of Hammys ato, i know the Bruins have Kevin Regan as their proposed future backup, but im still going to be optimistic about his tryout, also, the P-Bruins did awesome lastnight with the newly signed draft picks, Sauve, and Colborne both w/ 2pts.... might check them out when they come to the tsongas next weekend
Dont know what could come out of Hammys ato, i know the Bruins have Kevin Regan as their proposed future backup, but im still going to be optimistic about his tryout, also, the P-Bruins did awesome lastnight with the newly signed draft picks, Sauve, and Colborne both w/ 2pts.... might check them out when they come to the tsongas next weekend
Patman
Rodent of Unusual Size
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
I hope Hutton catches on with an AHL team next year... would hate to see him hit the ECHL level. Need to get him back in the NHL some day.
I hope Hutton catches on with an AHL team next year... would hate to see him hit the ECHL level. Need to get him back in the NHL some day.
Patman
Rodent of Unusual Size
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
I don't know what the final numbers look like this year... but it seems to me the stat of the year is "scoring first". I know I broke some of it down mid-year... but yeesh.
I don't know what the final numbers look like this year... but it seems to me the stat of the year is "scoring first". I know I broke some of it down mid-year... but yeesh.
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
when scoring first (18 games): 12-6-0
when not (21): 7-10-4
it isn't as bad as you'd think
in-league though it's pretty bad:
first (12): 8- 4- 0
not (15): 4- 7- 4
but that doesn't include the three games at maine, in which lowell went 0-1 when scoring first and 1-1 when not.
when scoring first (18 games): 12-6-0
when not (21): 7-10-4
it isn't as bad as you'd think
in-league though it's pretty bad:
first (12): 8- 4- 0
not (15): 4- 7- 4
but that doesn't include the three games at maine, in which lowell went 0-1 when scoring first and 1-1 when not.
ushl d man
Registered User
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
Is anyone going to the Woschester vs Lowell game tonight to see Schaus play he is in the line up I heard, guess he played really good last night. two big hits and really jumped up in the play. (I guess he gets to play a different system in the AHL. Good luck Nick see you at the game
Is anyone going to the Woschester vs Lowell game tonight to see Schaus play he is in the line up I heard, guess he played really good last night. two big hits and really jumped up in the play. (I guess he gets to play a different system in the AHL. Good luck Nick see you at the game
Patman
Rodent of Unusual Size
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
I hadn't realized it had evened out (sorta) to 18-21... in general the records are indicative of a good team (maybe not quite an NCAA team though)... the number of times they score first vs. not is indicative of a mediocre team... but again, its something to note.
Lowell scored 114 for and 92 against in all games. 98 for and 71 against after the first goal. I really don't want to spend my Saturday doing the advanced statistical hairsplitting... I do enough of that during the week.
I don't know... to me it reads like a team that had a hard time motivating themselves and then settled into a game as it wore on. But that's my feeling on the matter... I won't call it "thought".
I hadn't realized it had evened out (sorta) to 18-21... in general the records are indicative of a good team (maybe not quite an NCAA team though)... the number of times they score first vs. not is indicative of a mediocre team... but again, its something to note.
Lowell scored 114 for and 92 against in all games. 98 for and 71 against after the first goal. I really don't want to spend my Saturday doing the advanced statistical hairsplitting... I do enough of that during the week.
I don't know... to me it reads like a team that had a hard time motivating themselves and then settled into a game as it wore on. But that's my feeling on the matter... I won't call it "thought".
HawksSk860
Registered User
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
What's Auger up to now, anyways? He's not with CHI's AHL team?
What's Auger up to now, anyways? He's not with CHI's AHL team?
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
I found that video infuriating.
In a year when Hockey East was painfully mediocre, with the experienced team Lowell had, ANY view of this season as anything other than "Colossal Disappointment" or "Total Failure" is sugarcoating at its worst.
I found that video infuriating.
In a year when Hockey East was painfully mediocre, with the experienced team Lowell had, ANY view of this season as anything other than "Colossal Disappointment" or "Total Failure" is sugarcoating at its worst.
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
Hockey East had 2 teams play in regional finals and one is in the Frozen Four. That team is ranked third in the country, right? Mediocre?
Hockey East had 2 teams play in regional finals and one is in the Frozen Four. That team is ranked third in the country, right? Mediocre?
Patman
Rodent of Unusual Size
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
Yes. So the league is playing above average in the tournament... so what? all 5 games making up for the other hundred games?
Yes. So the league is playing above average in the tournament... so what? all 5 games making up for the other hundred games?
Patman
Rodent of Unusual Size
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
Sounds like a lot of "aw shucks" going on... if you screw up that often then its the system (hockey and/or psychological) and not luck.
Sounds like a lot of "aw shucks" going on... if you screw up that often then its the system (hockey and/or psychological) and not luck.
Re: UML offseason looking towards 2010/11 season
The league wasn't mediocre, but some of the teams were as always. BC and UNH are always at the top for the most part along with BU who had a down year. Lowell, UMass, VT will always be middle of the pack teams and Maine will be the "X" factor. In the end, Boston College made the Frozen Four, UNH made a regional final, and BU/Maine were playing their best hockey at the end of the season but fell short.
Seems to me that Hockey East was the same as it always is, except BU and Maine fell just short.
The league wasn't mediocre, but some of the teams were as always. BC and UNH are always at the top for the most part along with BU who had a down year. Lowell, UMass, VT will always be middle of the pack teams and Maine will be the "X" factor. In the end, Boston College made the Frozen Four, UNH made a regional final, and BU/Maine were playing their best hockey at the end of the season but fell short.
Seems to me that Hockey East was the same as it always is, except BU and Maine fell just short.