What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

So that's what it looks like when you play 60 minutes. Hmmm ...

Auger was a beast on the penalty kill last night. Great game for him, and glad to see he got a couple of assists as well. I don't like that they couldn't score 5-on-5 but I'll happily take the win. Outshot yet again though.
Nice win and great effort for 60 minutes by the Hawks. They played tough and physical all night long. Hopefully they can bring the same intensity to this afternoon game. Another point or two would be nice.

It looks like another injury for Lowell as Sammy D'Agostino left early in the first period. I saw him in the concourse later in the game; his arm was in a sling.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

Nice win and great effort for 60 minutes by the Hawks. They played tough and physical all night long. Hopefully they can bring the same intensity to this afternoon game. Another point or two would be nice.

It looks like another injury for Lowell as Sammy D'Agostino left early in the first period. I saw him in the concourse later in the game; his arm was in a sling.

Does anyone know why Hamilton wasn't dressed for the game last night? Is he also hurt?
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

This is one of the few games I've made it to this year, being in Springfield and all. Great win by the 'Hawks, but 4900 attending vs BC? Is there a good reason I shouldn't be dismayed by this?
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

I heard he has the Flu.

hooboy... yeah... wrap him a bubble in the third sub-basement of the arena until he gets better.

This is one of the few games I've made it to this year, being in Springfield and all. Great win by the 'Hawks, but 4900 attending vs BC? Is there a good reason I shouldn't be dismayed by this?

fans go as the team goes... that's all I'm going to read into this
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

last night's game made us feel as though this afternoon's is worth liveblogging. we'll post a link to it around 4:15. see ya then, nerds.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

fans go as the team goes... that's all I'm going to read into this

Yeah, this is a good point. In the previous administration (when we averaged approx. 3k/gm) more fans came when we played BC...because they wantred to see BC. Now people come to see the Riverhawks
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

last night's game made us feel as though this afternoon's is worth liveblogging. we'll post a link to it around 4:15. see ya then, nerds.

is there a live feed somewhere to go with a live blog?
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

fans go as the team goes... that's all I'm going to read into this
It's also a long weekend for some folks and the start of the school week vacation in MA. So that may have had an impact on the crowd as well. Nice turnout by the UML students last night.

It's amazing how the place fills in once the game starts. Ten minutes before faceoff the place was empty, by the end of the first period there was a decent crowd in the stands.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

Lowell played BC like the Giants played the Patriots in the Super Bowl. They played the perfect defensive game to win...and they did it twice in a span of three weeks. So kudos to UML for a stellar game plan both times.

BC ought to win tonight, mostly because they're probably pretty angry about last night. The Eagles knew what they'd be facing last night, and still succumbed to it anyway.

That's a silly analogy.

Comparing BC to the undefeated juggernaut that the '07 Patriots were and implying that Lowell's only chance to beat them was some miraculous defensive performance is disingenuous.

Sure, Lowell played a strong defensive game and slowed down a high powered BC attack. But they were also very strong on special teams, took an imposing physical game to the Eagles from whistle to buzzer and, most importantly, Hutton outperformed Muse.

This wasn't the second coming of the Miracle on Ice, no matter how you choose to spin it.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

I couldn't make the game today, how did the team look? I just saw the final score, tough one to lose giving up a late goal. They'll need to take some points in Orono as BU, NU and MC all won tonight. At the moment I believe the Hawks are in 7th place.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

I couldn't make the game today, how did the team look? I just saw the final score, tough one to lose giving up a late goal. They'll need to take some points in Orono as BU, NU and MC all won tonight. At the moment I believe the Hawks are in 7th place.

Probably this was the best weekend I've seen them play this season. More of the same from last night and they didn't let up. They did play a full 60 minutes. Dehner tried to go but couldn't. Overall, I was rather pleased with the effort tonight

Sorry, I have to put this game on the coaches.

What cost them the game? Groundhog Day #269

- Dehner unable to play. Folks w/o your best defenseman you aren't going to sweep anyone, especially a top four team in HE.

- Lack of putting the biscuit in the basket on USDA Grade A chances. Three chances in front of Milner with no one in sight and they couldn't put it home.

- A very poor power play with 2:50 to go in regulation, like most Lowell PP, dump and chase; dump and chase. They got nothing out of that PP. BC was all over them in the final minute and our defensemen couldn't clear the zone with under :30 to play. A unfortunate bounce over Edwards' stick and Krieder is alone in front of Hutton hung out to dry. Another classic "Big 4" we got more scoring talent than you and another one-goal defeat.

On the plus side,

- Lowell shut BC down for about 57 minutes of that game.

- Wright, Wetmore, and Ickert had stellar games. The future does look bright with these kids.

- Hutton had no chance on either of the two goals, in fact he played better tonight than last night.

I slammed my water bottle down because it was another predictable Lowell loss. I'm simply disgusted how the same scenario plays out time and time again. I can understand the system, but unless (long term) this team can find some scorers that you count on in the clutch, Lowell will lose 2-1 or 3-2 in big games 100% of the time.

The River Hawks are in 7th place and are not safe from missing the playoffs, especially if Tim Whitehead's crew does to us practically every time in a two-game series at Maine, sweep. The good news is that UVM is at UNH, the bad news, Merrimack has a two game set against UMA (of whom is in deep $h!t). If the River Hawks don't win one in Maine, they could be out of the playoffs in 9th place next week if Merrimack sweeps and UVM splits. Conversely, with a sweep of Maine, and splits, there could very well be a four way tied for third with three weeks to go.

I've done some calculating and while home ice is still possible, it is now very likely we will be on the road. I will put early odds that 40% to BU, 35% to ME, 20%BC/UNH, and 5% hosting BU. The only way I see us getting home ice is winning five of the six remaining games and that may not be enough. The UMA series cost us a seed and the BU game will cost us a seed.

Gut feeling we will go to BU, lose first game 5-3, win second game 3-1, and lose third game after going up 2-0 in OT 3-2. In any case, if we do go to BU or ME, I won't be in attendance. It's bad news when we play them in the playoffs.
 
Last edited:
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

- Lack of putting the biscuit in the basket on USDA Grade A chances. Three chances in front of Milner with no one in sight and they couldn't put it home.

A very poor power play with 2:50 to go in regulation, like most Lowell PP, dump and chase; dump and chase. They got nothing out of that PP.
Thanks John, It's good to hear the team played another solid 60 minutes. Goal scoring continues to be the issue. :mad:
Although the Hawks had two PP goals on Friday night, they couldn't convert on two late ones to put BC away. Sounds like the same thing today.

Someone on the BC thread mentioned Lowell was playing for a tie for whole third period, is that true?
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread Part II

Someone on the BC thread mentioned Lowell was playing for a tie for whole third period, is that true?
i don't think so, it was more that BC had the pedal down the entire period and dictated everything.
 
Back
Top