Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
Otsman played the whole time because although an expedition they thought it was important to win that game.
OK so let's go with that. You want to build your starting goalie's confidence, you're two periods in, and he's pitching a 1-0 shutout. Sounds like you've given him a strong foundation on which to build for the games that count, no?
Instead, you leave him in for the duration, during which he manages to give up a two (2) goal lead late in the game, and "wins" largely because a poorly coached opponent's defensemen forgot how to avoid 2-on-0 breakaways?!?
You guys know I'm a huge fan of Barr, and I'm p.o.'ed that UNH didn't beat UMaine to hiring him, due to the idiot former UNH AD unjustifiably giving his paisan an extension he didn't deserve. That hasn't changed, not one iota.
But unless one OR both of Ostman's back-ups were injured/ineligible, not playing at least one of 'em made no sense.
I'm frankly blown away that any UMaine-iac would use the word "important" in connection with an exhibition.
I can only imagine the discussion/drama on here if Ostman got hurt in the 3rd period ...