Re: The PPACA Thread Part IV - Repeal & Replace, or Something...
Below is a link from which the CNN story was drawn.
The numbers refer to a study done about people with conditions which were likely considered "preexisting conditions" under standards used pre-ACA. However, as noted in the study, the vast majority of those people already had coverage through employers or medicaid, so the numbers were pretty meaningless.
They are even more meaningless now, in all likelihood, since according to you the ACA pretty much wiped the slate clean of those who were uninsured before its passage.
http://kff.org/health-reform/issue-...individual-insurance-market-prior-to-the-aca/
Beautiful, politically, and largely irrelevant.HA! This analysis is beautiful...
https://politicalwire.com/2017/05/04/trump-states-likely-affected-gop-health-bill/
Below is a link from which the CNN story was drawn.
The numbers refer to a study done about people with conditions which were likely considered "preexisting conditions" under standards used pre-ACA. However, as noted in the study, the vast majority of those people already had coverage through employers or medicaid, so the numbers were pretty meaningless.
They are even more meaningless now, in all likelihood, since according to you the ACA pretty much wiped the slate clean of those who were uninsured before its passage.
http://kff.org/health-reform/issue-...individual-insurance-market-prior-to-the-aca/