What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The definitive tournament speculation thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

Per the 2010 NCAA DIII Men's Ice Hockey Championships handbook (page11, 6 on the PDF):



Now, I'm assuming they use the same method to enforce the 500-mile rule, so...

Results:
Code:
Results
From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: NEUMANN UNIVERSITY
Miles: 598.0

If you were getting numbers like 470 and 570, don't ask me where they get 598. Bottom line is: no go on the Adrian @ Neumann. Also, I checked Adrian to Fredonia, and it came to 338 miles. Close enough to bus for a tourny game, but not close enough to override Regional membership and count as in-region competition. And i think we can all agree that Fredonia is the westernmost Eastern Team. :(


Well this just got fun.

From the NCAA calculaitons:

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: OSWEGO, ST UNIV OF NEW YORK
Miles: 519.0

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: ELMIRA COLLEGE
Miles: 499.0

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: ST. NORBERT COLLEGE
Miles: 435.0

From: ADELPHI UNIVERSITY
To: FREDONIA, ST UNIV COLL AT
Miles: 437.0

It would appear that, per the NCAA's calculation tool, Adrian can not be sent to Oswego, and can only barely be sent to Elmira. This actually has a potentially huge effect on the bracket. I think it might mean that there's the possibility somebody gets flown for the Quarterfinals unless Adrian, likely the lowest ranked team in the tournament, gets to the quarterfinal round.
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

If Elmira continues their free fall and Manhattanville gets a sweep next weekend, how does that affect the bracket? It's been said that Adrian only has 3 options: Elmira, SNC, or Oswego.

Turns out Oswego might not be a valid option. M'ville over Elmira and Oswego and Plattsburgh from the SUNYAC likely means Adrian plays SNC, either in the first round or the quarters.

At this point it seems that there is no way Oswego should play an opening round game. You could say the same for SNC, but Oswego's resume is more impressive.

I agree with your second point, not your first. Norwich is not that far behind Oswego in the criteria. If Norwich jumps Oswego for the top seed, any scenario in which the E2 seed plays in the opening round (and there are several) would have Oswego playing Wednesday.

Could Elmira still snag a Pool C bid? Do they have to win the ECAC W? Are they done all together if M'ville does better in the conference tourney?

No, yes, probably - depends on their upcoming games.

I would like to hear that case

Code:
Norwich vs St. Scholastica
WIN      0.8421  1           0.7500  0
OWP      0.5606  1           0.5451  0
OOP      0.5141  0           0.5403  1

You can't make it yet. But some more winning from CSS and some less from NU and it could tighten up.

Why is automatically assumed that the ECAC West gets 2 teams in the NCAA's every year especially when they don't have an AC.

My last projection (and most of everybody's recent projections) only have one ECAC-West team in this year...

Maybe this year they will only get 1 since the ECAC West got 3 teams in last year and Neuman won NCAA last year.

This is so irrelevant as to be funny. What happened last year has no bearing on this year.

I find it hard to understand that a 7 team conference consistanly gets 2 teams in when there are other conferences with other good teams who gets snubbed. I guess it goes back to the smoke and mirrors of the selection committee.

You mean a six team conference? And the reason is that for several years, most of the teams in that conference kicked the snot out of teams in other conferences they played. Surely you're not advocating the line of thinking that keeps teams like Adrian/Fitchburg out of the tournament - that conference affiliation should preclude recognition?

I know you are making predictions but what would the option then be if say, Oswego does not win the SUNYAC outright. Face it, they have not done so in several years. Say for instance Plattsburgh wins the SUNYAC, then Oswego should get a Pool C bid.

Yes, then just swap Oswego and Plattsburgh in the SUNYAC/Pool C portions of my last bracket. Regional seedings don't change.

Furthermore, what happens if another team aside from Oswego or Plattsburgh wins it? Interesting as it may be, Oswego would get a Pool C before Plattsburgh but would both teams get in if say a Fredonia wins the SUNYAC?

This has been asked a couple times. At this point I am willing to say if Fredonia or somebody else wins the SUNYAC, Oswego and Plattsburgh are probably still in the tournament. Fredonia would be awarded with a Wednesday home game against Adrian.

If all the other favorites win out and Fredonia wins the SUNYAC, based on the work I have done the three Pool C teams would be Oswego, Plattsburgh, and St. Scholastica in that order. I think Josh would agree as well.

Yup.

If Oswego doesn't lose till the playoffs, they're still a virtual lock for the #1 seed in the east.

I disagree.

Code:
 Norwich vs Oswego
WIN      0.8421  0           0.9545  1
OWP      0.5606  1           0.5261  0
OOP      0.5141  0           0.5185  1
H2H     0- 0- 0              0- 0- 0
COP     2- 0- 2  0          5- 0- 0  1

If Oswego loses to Plattsburgh, that decreases their COP advantage, and then you're looking at a lower WIN that could be offset by Norwich's OWP. I'm not saying it's likely, but don't lock Oswego into anything just yet.

Plattsburgh's chances depend on what other pool c eligible teams do. Although their chances are still pretty good unless they lose their last sunyac game and a playoff game.

Plattsburgh has a very solid hold on the first Pool C bid and is likely the 4th overall seed in the tournament. That means Oswego would have to lose the SUNYAC to somebody other than Plattsburgh, St. Norbert would have to lose the NCHA, and Norwich would have to lose the ECAC-East before we see Plattsburgh knocked out.

And it doesn't matter how many teams are in a conference, all that matters is whether they earned an at large bid that year or not. It doesn't matter if there's 5 or 19 teams. The last few years there's been a bunch of solid to great teams in the ecac-w and they've gotten at large bids. This year there's two teams with solid cases, and the last week and the playoffs will determine which if not both get into the NCAA tournament.

Hard to say it better myself.

i haven't been paying alot of attention...but how do we forsee the play-in games..quarterfinals playing out.

assuming that Adrian, CSS, SNC, and the Miac winner are in...would they advance to quarters or would adrian go to SNC and MIAC winner to CSS as play-in games or quarters?

Or would Adrian go to Elmira, the MIAC winner to CSS with the winner facing SNC? It's one of those three options... your guess is as good as anybody's.
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

Having some more fun with the numbers here:

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: BROCKPORT, SUNY
Miles: 396.0

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: GENESEO, SUNY
Miles: 422.0

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: ST. NORBERT COLLEGE
Miles: 435.0

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: HOBART
Miles: 441.0

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT
Miles: 476.0

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: ST. MARY'S (MN)
Miles: 534.0

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIRE
Miles: 546.0

From: ADRIAN COLLEGE
To: HAMLINE UNIVERSITY
Miles: 632.0
(just listed them because the Bulldogs played 'em)


So, I think we can safely conclude that the only places Adrian can travel to without flying (if these teams can find a way into the tourny) are: Brockport, Fredonia, Elmira, Hobart, St. Norbert, and Stevens Point. Lebanon Valley is 532, Oswego is 519. Buffalo State and Geneseo would also be options if they were still tourny-eligible. RIT would be an option if they were still DIII. :cool:

The only others in a 500-mile radium are Lawrence, Concordia WI, MSOE, Marian, and Lake Forest... but there will be only 1 MCHA team. Of course, I wouldn't put it past the committee to put in 2 MCHA teams in order to have a place to send Adrian :rolleyes:
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

I disagree.

Code:
 Norwich vs Oswego
WIN      0.8421  0           0.9545  1
OWP      0.5606  1           0.5261  0
OOP      0.5141  0           0.5185  1
H2H     0- 0- 0              0- 0- 0
COP     2- 0- 2  0          5- 0- 0  1

If Oswego loses to Plattsburgh, that decreases their COP advantage, and then you're looking at a lower WIN that could be offset by Norwich's OWP. I'm not saying it's likely, but don't lock Oswego into anything just yet.
If you look at record against likely ranked teams, norwich is 4-2-2 while oswego is 5-1-0. Not a big difference, and the east could rank some random team that throws that all out of whack as well. I said in another thread that it'd almost be better for oswego to lose to geneseo or fredonia in the playoffs than plattsburgh, as then they might not gain a loss to a ranked team, and they won't lose any common opponent ground.

Kind of a weird world where you'd be worse off losing to a quality opponent than to a poor one.



Plattsburgh has a very solid hold on the first Pool C bid and is likely the 4th overall seed in the tournament. That means Oswego would have to lose the SUNYAC to somebody other than Plattsburgh, St. Norbert would have to lose the NCHA, and Norwich would have to lose the ECAC-East before we see Plattsburgh knocked out.
Again looking at 'likely' ranked teams, plattsburgh is not sitting pretty. 1-4-3 with the only win an early season one over middlebury (who they've now also lost to.) 2 losses to oswego, the split with midd, a loss to norwich, and ties with elmira, williams, and norwich.

Since we're talking about their pool c chances, they might end up 1-5-3 against ranked teams. Unless the eastern committee ranks fredonia (which might not be too large of a stretch considering how many eastern teams get ranked), or plattsburgh wins the sunyac, they're going to lose out on that category to a lot of other pool c contenders. A potential loss to potsdam in the last game of the season would also hurt immensely for COP and win%.

That rambling said, I'm still expecting both oswego and plattsburgh to be in the NCAAs, with both somewhere in the top 4 in the east.
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

I said in another thread that it'd almost be better for oswego to lose to geneseo or fredonia in the playoffs than plattsburgh, as then they might not gain a loss to a ranked team, and they won't lose any common opponent ground.


not possible. Geneseo isn't eligible for the post season.
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

Again looking at 'likely' ranked teams, plattsburgh is not sitting pretty. 1-4-3 with the only win an early season one over middlebury (who they've now also lost to.) 2 losses to oswego, the split with midd, a loss to norwich, and ties with elmira, williams, and norwich.

Since we're talking about their pool c chances, they might end up 1-5-3 against ranked teams. Unless the eastern committee ranks fredonia (which might not be too large of a stretch considering how many eastern teams get ranked), or plattsburgh wins the sunyac, they're going to lose out on that category to a lot of other pool c contenders. A potential loss to potsdam in the last game of the season would also hurt immensely for COP and win%.

That rambling said, I'm still expecting both oswego and plattsburgh to be in the NCAAs, with both somewhere in the top 4 in the east.

I think you are leaving out the 9-0 thrashing or highly ranked Trinity which brings it to 2-4-3. If they do rank Fredonia, which is very likely, that brings it to 4-4-3.

If you take a look at other Pool C contenders you will find their record vs. likely ranked teams to be:

St. Scholastica: 3-2-2
Amherst: 2-3-2
Bowdoin: 3-4-1
Trinity: 3-4-1
Williams: 4-3-2
Hamline: 4-3-1

And some teams projected for AQ's
Oswego: 8-1-0
Norwich: 6-1-2
Middlebury: 5-2-2
St. Norbert: 4-1-2
GAC: 4-1-0

So, Plattsburgh's record vs. likely ranked teams is pretty even with everyone else that would be in contention. Take into account that they win the rest of the criteria significantly against every team except for St. Scholastica, I would say they are in good shape. This is of course assuming they take care of Potsdam next weekend.
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

Josh,

Does everyone's results against Geneseo and Buffalo State get wiped out or do they still count for NCAA purposes?

Also, if by an act of god either of them were in position to be an NCAA ranked team, can they be ranked?
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

I think you are leaving out the 9-0 thrashing or highly ranked Trinity which brings it to 2-4-3. If they do rank Fredonia, which is very likely, that brings it to 4-4-3.

If you take a look at other Pool C contenders you will find their record vs. likely ranked teams to be:

St. Scholastica: 3-2-2
Amherst: 2-3-2
Bowdoin: 3-4-1
Trinity: 3-4-1
Williams: 4-3-2
Hamline: 4-3-1

And some teams projected for AQ's
Oswego: 8-1-0
Norwich: 6-1-2
Middlebury: 5-2-2
St. Norbert: 4-1-2
GAC: 4-1-0

So, Plattsburgh's record vs. likely ranked teams is pretty even with everyone else that would be in contention. Take into account that they win the rest of the criteria significantly against every team except for St. Scholastica, I would say they are in good shape. This is of course assuming they take care of Potsdam next weekend.
Well it would help if I had remembered they rank 15 eastern teams instead of just 10...

You're right, plattsburgh will end up around/below most of the rest of their competition unless they rank fredonia, which will jump them over the top. If fredonia doesn't get ranked and they drop another to Oswego, things might get a bit iffy though.

Just go lose to potsdam next week to add some drama, thanks! ;)
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

Josh,

Does everyone's results against Geneseo and Buffalo State get wiped out or do they still count for NCAA purposes?

Also, if by an act of god either of them were in position to be an NCAA ranked team, can they be ranked?

I might be wrong, in which case Josh, Russell, or one of the Matts will correct me, but... I'm fairly certain that, since there was no mention of vacating game results, their games still stand. Besides, they were being punished retroactively for a problem the corrected PRIOR to this season. You can't vacate a result unless that particular game was directly affected by the infraction.

As for the rankings, I haven't a clue... but it doesn't much matter, now does it? :p
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

I might be wrong, in which case Josh, Russell, or one of the Matts will correct me, but... I'm fairly certain that, since there was no mention of vacating game results, their games still stand. Besides, they were being punished retroactively for a problem the corrected PRIOR to this season. You can't vacate a result unless that particular game was directly affected by the infraction.

As for the rankings, I haven't a clue... but it doesn't much matter, now does it? :p

Correct, the games have not been vacated, and even if they were, it wouldn't matter. Vacating games only takes away results for the penalized team. It would however change SOS, but we don't need to worry about that since the games count.

For example, Oswego still lost the 1987 NCAA Championship game and nothing can take that away from them.
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

Correct, the games have not been vacated, and even if they were, it wouldn't matter. Vacating games only takes away results for the penalized team. It would however change SOS, but we don't need to worry about that since the games count.

For example, Oswego still lost the 1987 NCAA Championship game and nothing can take that away from them.

They lost, but nobody won...
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

If anyone was wondering, MIAC tiebreakers are insane.
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

If anyone was wondering, MIAC tiebreakers are insane.

Agreed, most bizarre thing I've ever seen:

Code:
Playoff Seeding Tie Breakers 
(Based only on conference competition)
1. Results of head to head competition.
2. Results against all teams above those tied. 
3. Results against all teams, beginning in rank order.
4. Order of losses, beginning with the ninth place team and moving up to those tied. 
5. Total goal series, with those tied. 
6. Goal differential for total conference season. 
7. Number of overtime losses. 
8. Random Selection.
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

"For example, Oswego still lost the 1987 NCAA Championship game and nothing can take that away from them."

They lost, but nobody won...

I was there...Plattsburgh won the game! :) :) They may have had their NCAA championship status taken away later, but the score was 8-3 in favor of Plattsburgh.

puck.jpg
:rolleyes:
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

Also, if by an act of god either of them were in position to be an NCAA ranked team, can they be ranked?

The other responses to your question are sufficient. But I see no reason why they couldn't be listed as NCAA ranked teams. Though I'll admit to not being an expert on NCAA regulations.

Besides, they were being punished retroactively for a problem the corrected PRIOR to this season. You can't vacate a result unless that particular game was directly affected by the infraction.

I disagree with this characterization of the infraction, but don't want to get into that in the tournament speculation thread.

If anyone was wondering, MIAC tiebreakers are insane.

Surprisingly, I was aware of this...
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

"For example, Oswego still lost the 1987 NCAA Championship game and nothing can take that away from them."



I was there...Plattsburgh won the game! :) :) They may have had their NCAA championship status taken away later, but the score was 8-3 in favor of Plattsburgh.

puck.jpg
:rolleyes:
They vacated the game, not just the championship. So as far as the NCAA is concerned, plattsburgh was not involved with that game. Oswego still lost, but had no opponent. :p

Josh, I know you're aware of this. However, do you know what #4 means? And if #5 means "goal differential in games between tied teams", why they didn't say that like they did in #6? And while I'm asking, do you know what they were smoking when they came up with 3-7?
 
Last edited:
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

They vacated the game, not just the championship. So as far as the NCAA is concerned, plattsburgh was not involved with that game. Oswego still lost, but had no opponent. :p

Whatever......I just wanted to show off my 1987 Championship Puck!:)
puck.jpg
 
Re: The definitive tournament speculation thread

Josh, I know you're aware of this. However, do you know what #4 means? And if #5 means "goal differential in games between tied teams", why they didn't say that like they did in #6? And while I'm asking, do you know what they were smoking when they came up with 3-7?

I definitely knew this. Because I had the same questions. Think I talked to a coach about it, but I remember the league office being useful when I needed to talk to them, so I'd recommend giving them a quick call tomorrow to sort things out. Then tell the rest of us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top