Re: The 2010 Cycling Thread!
Probert,
I'm not sure how you mean that, "should pretty much guarenteed invited" bit. Geox is, believe it or not, a PT team. Granted one of the worst, I saw yesterday they were ranked 29 out of 30 in Europe. However, by signing Menchov they get his points added to theirs so they'll be back next year, as PT. Even if they weren't PT, the plan is to change how the invite system works. I think its dumb, but it theoretically works like this this. Each non-PT team gets 18 points to spend on the PT/His races, which are weighted, once you spend them, your done with the PT for the year. This is from a cyclingnews piece from like May:
Probert,
I'm not sure how you mean that, "should pretty much guarenteed invited" bit. Geox is, believe it or not, a PT team. Granted one of the worst, I saw yesterday they were ranked 29 out of 30 in Europe. However, by signing Menchov they get his points added to theirs so they'll be back next year, as PT. Even if they weren't PT, the plan is to change how the invite system works. I think its dumb, but it theoretically works like this this. Each non-PT team gets 18 points to spend on the PT/His races, which are weighted, once you spend them, your done with the PT for the year. This is from a cyclingnews piece from like May:
There would be more restrictions for Pro Continental teams wanting access to world calendar races due to the implementation of a points system. For now, the UCI proposes that each Pro Continental team would start the season with 18 points to spend. To participate to the Tour de France would cost 9 points; the Giro d'Italia, the Vuelta a Espana and major Classics would cost six points; and the smaller ProTour events would cost three points. This system would prevent teams like Cervélo, Cofidis, Bbox Bouygues Telecom and BMC from taking part in all of the races of the world calendar without being ProTour teams.