What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

ScoobyDoo said:
Sounds like the old regime on this trade.
Click to expand...

Not sure. I don't mind losing Weller, and no way to tell if Fallstrom would pan out anyway. Pretty much depends on if they can get a second round draft pick back at some point.
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

Is this the beginning of a bigger move for the Bruins?
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

Sounds like a "nothing" move to me to keep the fan base engaged. Given the cap I'm not sure how the Bruins could bring in an impact player to help put the puck in the net.
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

Not bad for a soft listless team.
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3Zn4uUVoGzs&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3Zn4uUVoGzs&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>

BOOM!
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

GreatLakerMohawk said:
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3Zn4uUVoGzs&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3Zn4uUVoGzs&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>

BOOM!
Click to expand...

Despite the objections from the group of morons at the sports bar I was at, totally clean hit... Fundamental hockey: Skate with your head UP :mad:
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

RaceBoarder said:
Despite the objections from the group of morons at the sports bar I was at, totally clean hit... Fundamental hockey: Skate with your head UP :mad:
Click to expand...

Yep. Great hit. And I don't even hate Toews anymore (since he left UND and all). ;)
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

RaceBoarder said:
Despite the objections from the group of morons at the sports bar I was at, totally clean hit... Fundamental hockey: Skate with your head UP :mad:
Click to expand...

Brenthoven said:
Yep. Great hit. And I don't even hate Toews anymore (since he left UND and all). ;)
Click to expand...

Absolutely clean hit and Mitchell read the play the entire way. Of course the Blackhawks had to start sh-t after it. Whatever. :rolleyes:
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

GreatLakerMohawk said:
Absolutely clean hit and Mitchell read the play the entire way. Of course the Blackhawks had to start sh-t after it. Whatever. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

There's the rub. If I saw my teammate laid out, I'd probably start some *. Is it wrong? Sure, in hindsight. I don't blame 'em for it, as long as they don't go Brashear or Bertuzzi on the bit. But in the heat of the moment? Yeah, I understand it.
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

Brenthoven said:
There's the rub. If I saw my teammate laid out, I'd probably start some *. Is it wrong? Sure, in hindsight. I don't blame 'em for it, as long as they don't go Brashear or Bertuzzi on the bit. But in the heat of the moment? Yeah, I understand it.
Click to expand...

Dropping the gloves and starting a fight because your teammate was stupid and didn't keep his head up is bogus though. If you've got a problem with it, go hit that guy later on and cleanly. Think of it like a baseball game. You hit our guy, we'll hit yours... eventually.
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

Plus its stupid that the refs stopped play right away, preventing Vancouver from scoring.
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

Terrierbyassociation said:
Plus its stupid that the refs stopped play right away, preventing Vancouver from scoring.
Click to expand...

To be fair, the cavalry already headed out after Mitchell but it certainly would've been an odd-man rush the other way with the Creepo Twins.
 
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey

GreatLakerMohawk said:
Dropping the gloves and starting a fight because your teammate was stupid and didn't keep his head up is bogus though. If you've got a problem with it, go hit that guy later on and cleanly. Think of it like a baseball game. You hit our guy, we'll hit yours... eventually.
Click to expand...

If they indeed see the play "develop" I am with you. If they didn't, then I stand by my statement. Do you know what I am saying? ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top