bronconick
Yep, still here
Safe Harbor Day was a law passed by Congress. The only date shown in the Constitution is January 20 (previously March 4).
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
SCOTUS 15: Help Us, Ruth Bader Ginsburg! You're Our Only Hope!
- Thread starter MissThundercat
- Start date
- Status
Safe Harbor Day was a law passed by Congress. The only date shown in the Constitution is January 20 (previously March 4).
The founders do no such thing. They anticipated it, and built a government to withstand it.
https://docs-of-freedom.s3.amazonaw...list_No_10_Excerpts_Annotated_proof_3__1_.pdf
Fighting Sioux 23
New member
You're going to need to get one hell of a state symbol...like this:
"New Nevada" State Movement – What Would You Change, If You Could Do It Over Again?
ETA: Here is a video of their townhall. Seems pretty legit to me.
New Nevada State Movement - Home | Facebook
ETAx2: The lawyer that filed that brief (the guy presenting in the video) looks like an older, grayer, fatter, version of Hitler with glasses.
Last edited:
How about the Republic of Molossia? They file an Amicus brief yet? I love that guy. I think he has declared war on East Germany, or something. Even though East Germany ceases to exist, he maintains that his war declaration is valid because there is some island somewhere that used to be owned by East Germany, so his ire is directed at that island.
I'll have to research it. I think he was located somewhere in Nevada, too. Maybe he's connected with this New Nevada.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
SCOTUSBlog says what I've been thinking.
The Supremes need to obliterate Dump and the coup and the Nazis. They could write a decision that defines them and nails the coffin lid down on these sick traitors.
I don't think they will. The 3 principled Justices and 2 tactical ones will be enough to deny the TX bullsh-t. Maybe a couple of the 4 cowards will trail along (Alito and Drunky McRapist probably) to not to go down (yet) in history as fascists and jokes. Maybe all four will, and we'll see 9-0. But I don't think we will see the courage the job demands -- I doubt we'll see Roberts light up the Nazis and end this threat once and for all.
This Court would be 5-4 on Brown v Board.
The Supremes need to obliterate Dump and the coup and the Nazis. They could write a decision that defines them and nails the coffin lid down on these sick traitors.
I don't think they will. The 3 principled Justices and 2 tactical ones will be enough to deny the TX bullsh-t. Maybe a couple of the 4 cowards will trail along (Alito and Drunky McRapist probably) to not to go down (yet) in history as fascists and jokes. Maybe all four will, and we'll see 9-0. But I don't think we will see the courage the job demands -- I doubt we'll see Roberts light up the Nazis and end this threat once and for all.
This Court would be 5-4 on Brown v Board.
Last edited:
French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
Ah so it's cool they're doing it then.
Denied on the grounds that Texas lacks standing to decide to eject our votes... true, if unsatisfying. I am hoping to see this Republican party implosion capped off by Trump and the Q crowd going after the SCOTUS on Parler as being disloyal RINOs. Let it be the end.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Exactly what I said. This is one time Kepler is happy to be wrong!
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1337546294408187904
Last edited:
MinnesotaNorthStar
Minding the gap
Exactly what I said. This is one time Kepler is happy to be wrong!
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1337546294408187904
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Jz1TjCphXE
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Also of note...Thomas and Alito voted that the Supreme Court should hear the case because they think any fight between states should be heard by the Supreme Court. They also said they would have ruled against Texas if they had. So even though it was 7-2 to hear the case it was 9-0 against Texas.
https://twitter.com/mjs_DC/status/1337550551010209794
https://twitter.com/mjs_DC/status/1337550551010209794
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
The only one saying the Court would be an issue was Kepler. No one else thought it would even the people you think you are mocking. (like me) The issue isnt the result the issue is the action itself.
rufus
rock and roller
Go ahead, pat yourself on the back, Sicatoka.
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Texas GOP opines about the Red States seceding...
Totally normal...
Hey Siri: how do know when you’re in a civil war?
Alexa: What’s Fort Sumter?
Ok Google: Define ‘sedition’
Frinkiac: What’s a battle?
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
The issue I thought it would have was that the bad guys would break unanimity if they wrote any language saying fascist coups were bad. Note that there is no such language.
However, the Alito and Thomas statements that they would have heard the case are not about the merits, such as they are, of the coup, but a separate argument about original jurisdiction. So they weren't actually being dicks.
- Status