Re: RPI 2010 Recruiting III: Monty's Quest for the Holy Grail
I dropped it with my opinion. He is the one who decided to disect it and add nothing. It is part of the recruiting chat if people feel a recruit is high up on a list based upon play, peformance etc. My opinion is that is not what CH tries to accomplish. If someone else has an opinion of why that is wrong, it adds flavor and value. To keep saying, you are wrong, tou are dense and add zero content is a waste of energy.
Why don't you start a new thread on discussing Heisnberg's list if you need to discuss this further. This has diverged from a dsicussion of RPI recruits and potential recruits.
I dropped it with my opinion. He is the one who decided to disect it and add nothing. It is part of the recruiting chat if people feel a recruit is high up on a list based upon play, peformance etc. My opinion is that is not what CH tries to accomplish. If someone else has an opinion of why that is wrong, it adds flavor and value. To keep saying, you are wrong, tou are dense and add zero content is a waste of energy.