TigerFan86-87
R!!!!...I!!!!!...T!!!!!!
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS - Offseason 2011 - Dreaming About 2011-2012 <<<<<
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS - Offseason 2011 - Dreaming About 2011-2012 <<<<<
I was wondering if it had something to do with the NCAA not recognizing a D-III championship until somewhat recently. But they have had a D-III championship since 2002, so that is likely not why. I looked in the Women's Hockey Media Guide from 2006-2007 (4 years ago) to see if there was any reference to Club vs. NCAA. There was not. There were plenty of references to the Lady Tigers' ECAC East membership including the following:
"During the 2005-06 campaign, the Tigers continued their streak of
winning seasons, finishing with a 15-10 record. They advanced to the
ECAC Semifinals for the 17th time in team history."
Last I checked, the ECAC was only comprised of NCAA teams, not club teams. And of note, the first five NCAA championship teams were also ECAC teams (Elmira twice, Middlebury three times). So RIT had to have been NCAA at least since 2002.
It seems very strange to me. I remember going to a few Women's games way back in the late 90's and they didn't seem to be lacking equipment even back then. I never saw them play a non-NCAA institution either. Heck, when they played Vermont, it was the Catamounts that looked more like a team trying to scrape together enough equipment for themselves. Their pants (blue) didn't match the jerseys (green and gold - just like the men's) and weren't even all the same shade of blue. RIT looked by far the more polished program each time I saw them play (I didn't see any national powers, however).
Re: >>>>> RIT TIGERS - Offseason 2011 - Dreaming About 2011-2012 <<<<<
Agreed...I started working at the Ritter in 1989 for work study hours as an undergrad and the women's team was definitely well equipped and competing in NCAA games. I distinctly remember working several ECAC playoff games vs SLU in the early 90s (losses, but still games).
EDIT: Now that I think about it, might not have been playoffs, but definitely ECAC league games.
I was wondering if it had something to do with the NCAA not recognizing a D-III championship until somewhat recently. But they have had a D-III championship since 2002, so that is likely not why. I looked in the Women's Hockey Media Guide from 2006-2007 (4 years ago) to see if there was any reference to Club vs. NCAA. There was not. There were plenty of references to the Lady Tigers' ECAC East membership including the following:
"During the 2005-06 campaign, the Tigers continued their streak of
winning seasons, finishing with a 15-10 record. They advanced to the
ECAC Semifinals for the 17th time in team history."
Last I checked, the ECAC was only comprised of NCAA teams, not club teams. And of note, the first five NCAA championship teams were also ECAC teams (Elmira twice, Middlebury three times). So RIT had to have been NCAA at least since 2002.
It seems very strange to me. I remember going to a few Women's games way back in the late 90's and they didn't seem to be lacking equipment even back then. I never saw them play a non-NCAA institution either. Heck, when they played Vermont, it was the Catamounts that looked more like a team trying to scrape together enough equipment for themselves. Their pants (blue) didn't match the jerseys (green and gold - just like the men's) and weren't even all the same shade of blue. RIT looked by far the more polished program each time I saw them play (I didn't see any national powers, however).