TigerFan86-87
R!!!!...I!!!!!...T!!!!!!
Re: RIT 2010-11: What do Tigers dream of?
Yes, but RIT is not a Hockey East school. For most schools (at least most Big-4's), I would agree with that philosopy. However, given the circumstances around last season's run by the Tigers, it was quite a different situation. RIT was in only their 3rd year of tournament eligibility, offering no scholarships, belonging to the not quite so competitive AHA, etc... That run was monumental for that team, the program, the school, and even the Rochester community. It was a BIG DEAL, and most likely will not happen again for the foreseeable future, for all we know. It deserved to be celebrated with at least a pre-game acknowledgement of the banner if nothing else. I'm sure that neither Miami nor Wisconsin hung banners for their runs to the FF last year. But to established Big-4 programs, coming in 2nd or merely being a semi-finalist is good, but definitely not ceremony or banner worthy.
I do agree, however that the East Regional Champs and Frozen Four banners are redundant. Winning the East Regional is how they got to the Frozen Four. One couldn't exist without the other also being true (the fact that there are three other regionals being somewhat irrelevant since RIT was not in any of those others). And I also cringe at "Participation" trophies (or banners in this case). Get rid of the FF banner! Although I guess if they had made one banner that said: 2010 NCAA D-I East Regional Champions with some footnote-like reference to the Frozen Four or maybe last year's FF logo, that would have been ok. Not to mention that I still think last year's FF logo was the coolest one they've come up with by far
.
Personally I'm not a fan of doing a banner raising ceremony unless you won the national championship. By all means put the banner up for things like making the NCAA tourney / frozen four, but I feel a pregame ceremony is reserved for winning it all. That's the way Hockey East teams do it...
Yes, but RIT is not a Hockey East school. For most schools (at least most Big-4's), I would agree with that philosopy. However, given the circumstances around last season's run by the Tigers, it was quite a different situation. RIT was in only their 3rd year of tournament eligibility, offering no scholarships, belonging to the not quite so competitive AHA, etc... That run was monumental for that team, the program, the school, and even the Rochester community. It was a BIG DEAL, and most likely will not happen again for the foreseeable future, for all we know. It deserved to be celebrated with at least a pre-game acknowledgement of the banner if nothing else. I'm sure that neither Miami nor Wisconsin hung banners for their runs to the FF last year. But to established Big-4 programs, coming in 2nd or merely being a semi-finalist is good, but definitely not ceremony or banner worthy.
I do agree, however that the East Regional Champs and Frozen Four banners are redundant. Winning the East Regional is how they got to the Frozen Four. One couldn't exist without the other also being true (the fact that there are three other regionals being somewhat irrelevant since RIT was not in any of those others). And I also cringe at "Participation" trophies (or banners in this case). Get rid of the FF banner! Although I guess if they had made one banner that said: 2010 NCAA D-I East Regional Champions with some footnote-like reference to the Frozen Four or maybe last year's FF logo, that would have been ok. Not to mention that I still think last year's FF logo was the coolest one they've come up with by far
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Smile :) :)"