What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

  • Thread starter Thread starter Priceless
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

They do help drive wages down, though. The better solution is for the men to stay home. Soap operas would just run hardcore porn all day. Baseball teams would play in the afternoons again. And drunk driving accidents would go down because we would be drunk driving in the daytime. Everybody wins.
Now you're talking!

Men must work at two times:
That time of the month. Overnight trips preferred ->> this gets them away from ......
Pregnancy ... don't worry, be happy
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

What about January Jones? Howard Jones (No One is to Blame)? George Jones (C+W Singer), Bridgit Jones (although she is British)? Norah Jones?

And of course, Tom Jones.
I said it was a partial list.
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

Meanwhile, in Cleveland...


Occupy Cleveland: Issue 2 Fosters Cordial Relations With Police Union

The battle to repeal Ohio's controversial collective bargaining law is being credited with creating a good relationship between Occupy Cleveland and Cleveland police officers

The Occupy Cleveland rally, which has taken over the city's Public Square, has been marked by relatively cordial relations between the demonstrators and police officers, a difference from the confrontations that have marked the Occupy Oakland protests in recent days. The Nov. 8 referendum to repeal a law that prohibits collective bargaining by public employees, along with requiring employee contributions on health care and pensions -- known as Issue 2 -- has led to the good relationship. Occupy Cleveland recently received a court order allowing 24-hour occupation of the square.

"Generally speaking they have been pretty good," Occupy Cleveland spokesman Jacob Wagner said of the police. "We have an open dialogue with [police union president] Steve Loomis. We have had officers stop by in uniform to drop off tents and materials."

Loomis confirmed the cordial relationship between his union and those in the Occupy movement.
---
The relationship even led to 11 peaceful arrests in Cleveland earlier this month. Loomis said police officers explained to the Occupy Cleveland demonstrators that they needed to make some arrests in the early days of the protest as participants remained after the square's closing time. Wagner said the group understood the what the police needed to do.

"We want to make sure when we engage in civil disobedience it is safe," Wagner said. "We don't want to see what happened in New York or Oakland. There are a lot of law students and lawyers among us. When the arrests did occur, the police knew who was volunteering to be arrested and who wasn't."

Loomis said police officers are continuing to follow orders and will keep the peace, but at the same time will work with the protesters.

"It was as pleasant an experience as that could have been, arresting people," he said. "It was not violent and not confrontational. That is a good thing for everybody."

Patrol Officer Jennifer Ciaccia, a spokeswoman for the Cleveland Police Department, said the department did not have a position on the relationship between the union and Occupy Cleveland.

Loomis noted the dialogue also helped when Occupy Cleveland leaders considered moving the protest to the police memorial park, which he described as "sacred ground" for police officers. He said he and other union leaders reached out to the Occupy movement to discuss the issue and the Occupy movement choose a new location.

Going to be fascinating to hear the right-wing, law and order, cops can do no wrong types find a reason to criticize these police officers. They were probably recruited by the "Red Army" :D
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

It's interesting to see the different cities' responses to the protests. In some places it is completely amicable, in others it's practically a pitched battle.

The usual suspects will of course apply the same tired narratives to it they apply to everything else -- they would apply them to schoolyard fights or exhibition field hockey games if they could, it's the only thing they ever see. For people willing to keep an open mind, there are no easy answers. Like the Arab Spring, it's way too early to judge.
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

It's interesting to see the different cities' responses to the protests. In some places it is completely amicable, in others it's practically a pitched battle.

The usual suspects will of course apply the same tired narratives to it they apply to everything else -- they would apply them to schoolyard fights or exhibition field hockey games if they could, it's the only thing they ever see. For people willing to keep an open mind, there are no easy answers.
The mayor of Oakland apologized and said it would never happen again. Here in Portland it seems to have been pretty friendly because the Occupy group agreed not to camp in Monument Square, they are camping a few blocks away and marching. I have tried to tell every Occupy group on Twitter that the police are natural allies in this: they are part of the 99% too.

I also don't think these are your typical protest groups. As the Occupy Cleveland rep points out, several of the marchers are lawyers or law students...not the type of people that are going to throw rocks or set cars on fire. There are going to be bad eggs on both sides (it was only one cop who threw the flare in Oakland) but there is no reason the protesters can't work with the police to keep things amicable. The exception appears to be in Chicago, where Rahm Emanuel has told the Occupy movement to clear out of his city.
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

those aren't real cops - they're the union goons; they're just in it for the pension and free health care. Of course they're going to cozy up to the rioters, especially on their two-hour lunch break... If they were real cops, they wouldn't be afraid of these rioters, now would they?

Exactly! Where is the Gestapo when you need them?
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

those aren't real cops - they're the union goons; they're just in it for the pension and free health care. Of course they're going to cozy up to the rioters, especially on their two-hour lunch break... If they were real cops, they wouldn't be afraid of these rioters, now would they?
It was good, up until the part where you said they were afraid of the rioters. :p
You also didn't incorporate the word "Socialism" (or Communism or Marxism) in there. ;)
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

It's interesting to see the different cities' responses to the protests. In some places it is completely amicable, in others it's practically a pitched battle.

The usual suspects will of course apply the same tired narratives to it they apply to everything else -- they would apply them to schoolyard fights or exhibition field hockey games if they could, it's the only thing they ever see. For people willing to keep an open mind, there are no easy answers. Like the Arab Spring, it's way too early to judge.

Really? Sounds like you've already made up your mind. I guess when you resort to "the same tired narratives," the result is somehow different, eh? "No easy answers?" "open mind?" classic libtard propaganda, the answers that appeal to you are easy enough. The libtard "open mind" is on display for all to see every day in the political threads.
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

The mayor of Oakland apologized and said it would never happen again. Here in Portland it seems to have been pretty friendly because the Occupy group agreed not to camp in Monument Square, they are camping a few blocks away and marching. I have tried to tell every Occupy group on Twitter that the police are natural allies in this: they are part of the 99% too.

I also don't think these are your typical protest groups. As the Occupy Cleveland rep points out, several of the marchers are lawyers or law students...not the type of people that are going to throw rocks or set cars on fire. There are going to be bad eggs on both sides (it was only one cop who threw the flare in Oakland) but there is no reason the protesters can't work with the police to keep things amicable. The exception appears to be in Chicago, where Rahm Emanuel has told the Occupy movement to clear out of his city.

Lawyers and law students representing the National Lawyers Guild, a communist founded, communist dominated organization. They're going to be a little more subtle, like that a*shole who shoved his ankle under a police scooter in NY, pretending he'd been runover. I believe the MSM referred to him as a "legal observer." Classy, watching him flop around like a mackeral.

If the Mayor of Oakland was apologizing for the guy with the fractured skull, fine. But there should be no apologies for putting a hitch in the getalongs of lawbreakers. And going for moral equivalence won't work, either. The police have responsibilities to preserve order, to protect citizens and property. The "Occupy" parasites have no such responsibilities. Oh, and here's a clip where an "Occupy" babe admits they were throwing rocks and bottles at cops BEFORE they moved in. Her rationale? "they were in full riot gear." Oh, then nevermind..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHlHiNEZ1wA&feature=player_embedded
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

Nice.

On Friday, the law firm of Steven J. Baum threw a Halloween party. The firm, which is located near Buffalo, is what is commonly referred to as a “foreclosure mill” firm, meaning it represents banks and mortgage servicers as they attempt to foreclose on homeowners and evict them from their homes. Steven J. Baum is, in fact, the largest such firm in New York; it represents virtually all the giant mortgage lenders, including Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo.

The party is the firm’s big annual bash. Employees wear Halloween costumes to the office, where they party until around noon, and then return to work, still in costume. I can’t tell you how people dressed for this year’s party, but I can tell you about last year’s.

That’s because a former employee of Steven J. Baum recently sent me snapshots of last year’s party. In an e-mail, she said that she wanted me to see them because they showed an appalling lack of compassion toward the homeowners — invariably poor and down on their luck — that the Baum firm had brought foreclosure proceedings against.
When we spoke later, she added that the snapshots are an accurate representation of the firm’s mind-set. “There is this really cavalier attitude,” she said. “It doesn’t matter that people are going to lose their homes.” Nor does the firm try to help people get mortgage modifications; the pressure, always, is to foreclose. I told her I wanted to post the photos on The Times’s Web site so that readers could see them. She agreed, but asked to remain anonymous because she said she fears retaliation.

Let me describe a few of the photos. In one, two Baum employees are dressed like homeless people. One is holding a bottle of liquor. The other has a sign around her neck that reads: “3rd party squatter. I lost my home and I was never served.” My source said that “I was never served” is meant to mock “the typical excuse” of the homeowner trying to evade a foreclosure proceeding.

A second picture shows a coffin with a picture of a woman whose eyes have been cut out. A sign on the coffin reads: “Rest in Peace. Crazy Susie.” The reference is to Susan Chana Lask, a lawyer who had filed a class-action suit against Steven J. Baum — and had posted a YouTube video denouncing the firm’s foreclosure practices. “She was a thorn in their side,” said my source.

A third photograph shows a corner of Baum’s office decorated to look like a row of foreclosed homes. Another shows a sign that reads, “Baum Estates” — needless to say, it’s also full of foreclosed houses. Most of the other pictures show either mock homeless camps or mock foreclosure signs — or both. My source told me that not every Baum department used the party to make fun of the troubled homeowners they made their living suing. But some clearly did. The adjective she’d used when she sent them to me — “appalling” — struck me as exactly right.
20111029_NOCERA-IMG-slide-V4QD-articleLarge.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top