What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

These 2 offenses in the CHI-GB game must really be striking fear in the hearts of the rest of the NFL. Cutler looks horrible and Rodgers isn't much better. What was it I heard about the NFC North being stacked with QB's now?
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

bigblue_dl said:
These 2 offenses in the CHI-GB game must really be striking fear in the hearts of the rest of the NFL. Cutler looks horrible and Rodgers isn't much better. What was it I heard about the NFC North being stacked with QB's now?
Click to expand...

You think the Bears want Orton back?

Cutler: 6-17, 117 yards, 3 INTs.:eek:
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

It's early, but so far Cutler looks like Mike Tomczak with a much bigger ego.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

bigblue_dl said:
These 2 offenses in the CHI-GB game must really be striking fear in the hearts of the rest of the NFL. Cutler looks horrible and Rodgers isn't much better. What was it I heard about the NFC North being stacked with QB's now?
Click to expand...

Every division is stacked with QBs, just that in the NFC North it's stacked with overrated mediocre ones.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Brenthoven said:
The AFC West begs to differ. ;)
Click to expand...

Phil Rivers, Matt Cassel/Brodie Croyle, JaMarcus Russell and Kyle Orton.

No, that's one good QB and straight garbage.

In the North we get tBrettFavre, Jay Cutler and Aaron Rodgers. The Lions don't count as an NFL team. Favaro is washed up, Cutler eats dick and Aaron Rodgers might die tonight.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

GreatLakerMohawk said:
Phil Rivers, Matt Cassel/Brodie Croyle, JaMarcus Russell and Kyle Orton.

No, that's one good QB and straight garbage.

In the North we get tBrettFavre, Jay Cutler and Aaron Rodgers. The Lions don't count as an NFL team. Favaro is washed up, Cutler eats dick and Aaron Rodgers might die tonight.
Click to expand...

I'm just saying that the AFC West is not stacked with QB's. You have one legit (and good) QB, and a bunch of blah.

And if it matters, I'd take Stafford over Russell. Both teams are garbage, though.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Brenthoven said:
I'm just saying that the AFC West is not stacked with QB's. You have one legit (and good) QB, and a bunch of blah.

And if it matters, I'd take Stafford over Russell. Both teams are garbage, though.
Click to expand...

My sarcastic use of "stacked" slipped by you.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

rarely does football put me to sleep.... but i am typing with my eyes closed at this point.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

pardonme said:
Did anyone else see the ref laughing at the Bears after the fake punt? I thought that said it all.
Click to expand...
And the Bears were laughing after the illegal contact call that kept the big 4th quarter drive alive. What an embarassment for the league.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Yes, Rodgers obviously should have dove headfirst into a <strike>first down</strike> concussion. Goddamm, Collinsworth is a retard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top