What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

cripes... i'm 5-8 for the week :( :o

losers: pit/cleve/hous/indy/tb/ariz/gmen. yuck.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

mookie1995 said:
cripes... i'm 5-8 for the week :( :o

losers: pit/cleve/hous/indy/tb/ariz/gmen. yuck.
Click to expand...

2-1 right now: Den/MN win, Ari loss. GB going right now, and I hate saying it, but I'm putting money on NE covering tomorrow. :(
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Brenthoven said:
2-1 right now: Den/MN win, Ari loss. GB going right now, and I hate saying it, but I'm putting money on NE covering tomorrow. :(
Click to expand...

i need chi/ne/sd to win to at least start the pool at .500


could be one long season...:mad:
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

mookie1995 said:
cripes... i'm 5-8 for the week :( :o

losers: pit/cleve/hous/indy/tb/ariz/gmen. yuck.
Click to expand...
If you honestly thought cleveland, tampa, and washington were going to win.... well, you're going to need a lot of help ;)
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

one_to7 said:
If you honestly thought cleveland, tampa, and washington were going to win.... well, you're going to need a lot of help ;)
Click to expand...

:confused: :confused:

cleve was getting 4 at home.
tampax was getting 6 at home.
giants gave 6.5 (and won by 6).

what the hell are you talking about?!?:p
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

mookie1995 said:
:confused: :confused:

cleve was getting 4 at home.
tampax was getting 6 at home.
giants gave 6.5 (and won by 6).

what the hell are you talking about?!?:p
Click to expand...
Well, I thought you were talking about a pickem, not necessarily against the spread. :p
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

cutler is on the take... he was trying like he!! to throw a pick there:eek:
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

mookie1995 said:
:confused: :confused:

cleve was getting 4 at home.
tampax was getting 6 at home.
giants gave 6.5 (and won by 6).

what the hell are you talking about?!?:p
Click to expand...

Uh, I woulda taken MN up to -6.5, and even possibly past that.
And?
And?

Tampa is terrible, and Worshington is even more so.

For the record, I took GB and Denver both straight up. For the latter, the odds were better (+195, IIRC).
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Brenthoven said:
Uh, I woulda taken MN up to -6.5, and even possibly past that.
And?
And?

Tampa is terrible, and Worshington is even more so.

For the record, I took GB and Denver both straight up. For the latter, the odds were better (+195, IIRC).
Click to expand...

WASHINGTON COVERED!!!!!!!!

geez..:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top