What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Now I'm contemplating if I want to make any fantasy transactions...

I'm considering dropping Torry Holt and picking up either Patrick Crayton or Devery Henderson. Also, Fred Jackson was put on waivers, thinking about picking him up and dropping Laurence Maroney, since it seems that Jackson is a clear #1 and Maroney is one of several backs. I'll probably end up doing nothing.:p
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

nfl is now worse than the nba. quickly approaching wwf level
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

The Raiders just got *ed. Capital F. Not even a reacharound. :eek:
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

are they reviewing that?? looked like his arm slid as he was tackled out of bounds, i wonder if the ball hit the ground....
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Brenthoven said:
The Raiders just got *ed. Capital F. Not even a reacharound. :eek:
Click to expand...
I think the ruling was he didn't maintain control as he hit the ground since the ball did move, but yeah, I agree that that should have counted.

I need two TD's from Gates and Zach Miller needs to pull something and be inactive in the 2nd half.

Down 22...
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

MinnesotaNorthStar said:
I think the ruling was he didn't maintain control as he hit the ground since the ball did move, but yeah, I agree that that should have counted.

I need two TD's from Gates and Zach Miller needs to pull something and be inactive in the 2nd half.

Down 22...
Click to expand...

GreatLakerMohawk said:
No lube, no reach-around. Just straight F'ed.
Click to expand...

That wasn't a conjugal visit. That was federal *-you-in-the-arse prison rape right there. Two feet and a butt touches the ground before the ball slips.

And I'm up by nine. If any SD scoring is to occur, please make it defensive or running (running not done by Rivers).
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Brenthoven said:
That wasn't a conjugal visit. That was federal *-you-in-the-arse prison rape right there. Two feet and a butt touches the ground before the ball slips.

And I'm up by nine. If any SD scoring is to occur, please make it defensive or running (running not done by Rivers).
Click to expand...
No...Rivers can get two to Gates. It's only going to cost you 6 points, but it gets me 24. :D
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

So, now, you not only have to have two feet down, but you have to go to the ground and have control of the ball at THAT point for it to count??????

WWE. All the way.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

I have Rivers, but he can eat donkey dick the rest of the night for all I care, since I've clinched the win this week, despite all but 2 of my starters having a bad week.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

bigblue_dl said:
I have Rivers, but he can eat donkey dick the rest of the night for all I care, since I've clinched the win this week, despite all but 2 of my starters having a bad week.
Click to expand...

You sound like my matchup in the USCHO league....
I had Brees......

He had AP.

Oh, and Reggie Wayne. :mad:
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

The difference between:

What we all thought Oakland was, and is doing right now

--and--

What we all thought SD was, and is doing right now

is about the same difference in expectations/results. If not in favor of Oakland.

I am stunned.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Wow.


Although, that was the worst thing that coulda happened to the Rube Regime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top