Crazy game. Both teams had multiple chances to win and each team responded when down by a goal. Midd gets 3pts, but has to feel like they got a get out of jail free card. Teams are very close in talent and Jones in net was more important to the Panthers that was Stuart to Amherst. Announcer guy was having a heart attack calling the game with all the dramatics. Questionable call against the Jeffs late in the game did not come back to hurt them, but announcer guy was all over the refs about it to the point of being unfairly rude. Not cool. Expect to see these two again in the playoffs, likely the NESCAC finals at Middlebury.
Predictions for weekend...
Williams & Colby...........Split
Trinity & Hamilton.........Bantams sweep
Conn & Wesleyan..........Cardinals sweep
Bowdoin & Middlebury....Panthers sweep
Colby@Williams-hot goalie vs bigger offense; Ephs need to tighten pk; 3 points for Williams
Hamilton@Trinity-Continentals really need to tighten pk; 3 points for the Bantams
Wesleyan@Connecticut College-Cardinal sweep
Bowdoin@Middlebury-alumnae weekend for the Panthers (game 10am Saturday); Midd has a couple of injuries; will they try to sneak Coach Greer back on ice; Panther sweep
Well you were certainly psychic on this one, as Midd took it to Bowdoin in e 2nd. Why did you think the 2nd period would be the difference maker?Colby@Williams Colby Goalie steals a game Split
Hamilton@Trinity Trinity Sweeps. Bad match up for Hamilton
Wesleyan@Conn College Conn College desperate for wins will take both games at home
Bowdoin@Middlebury Bowdoin needs a fourth line and another set of defenders to compete against a team like Mid. Bowdoin goalies have played well especially of late. Look at the second periods of these games to be the difference! Mid get 3 points, Bowdoin steals a point Friday night
Few comments:
- Williams - Getting the job done against the teams in the lower half of the league. Now they play Bowdoin, Amherst, and Middlebury over the next 3 weekends. Be interesting how they fare against the upper half of the league. But definitely an improvement so far from the past few years and taking advantage of a pretty strong freshman class.
- Wesleyan - Similarly on the upswing (although not at the same level as Williams yet, but it was a steeper climb). Points every weekend is a good goal for them and they are getting it done.
- Colby - Fairly good offensive team with good goaltending but struggling to clear their own zone against good teams. Playing a really different style than when Venditti coached them, but one more suited to their players IMHO.
- Conn College - Wow, how undisciplined and dirty is this team? They are averaging almost 15 minutes a game in the conference in penalties (largely on the backs of Dineen, Farrell, Pagano and Hunter - not unexpected from the last 2 having seen them play in high school/club hockey), 5 more than anyone else in the NESCAC. And the penalties are nearly all of the roughing, cross-checking, hitting-from-behind, body-checking, elbowing, etc variety with at least 2 ejections. It's just stupid, embarrassing hockey, especially considering that they have a pretty talented team - can't imagine why the coaches take this approach, but wow is it flawed judging from their 2-5-3 record in the league and they haven't played Middlebury, Amherst, or Williams (top 3 for now) yet. Totally wasting their talent. I'm sure the Conn apologists (if there are any - Cross Check?) will argue it is the refereeing, but everybody is playing in front of the same refs and not having nearly the penalty calls against them, so that excuse is garbage.
You make a half decent point then go off on a fool's rant. Undisciplined? Yes. Dirty? no. You sound like a whiney Cardinal parent [there were plenty of those at Dayton this weekend...talk about 'undisciplined'...I haven't seen such poor behavior at a nescac game in years....yelling, banging the glass, swearing, etc.].
Penalties are a huge issue for the Camels...and IMO are the #1 reason they are where they are in the standings. However, most of the penalties are not 'dirty'....More often than not, they are called for interference, tripping, or checking [which is often not 'dirty' simply over-aggessive play]. In any case, taking stupid penalties must have consequences if the problem is to be corrected...if they don't fix the problem soon, they will be in big trouble vs the top teams they play in the next 30 days. You can't play nearly an entire period short-handed and expect to win.
Well you were certainly psychic on this one, as Midd took it to Bowdoin in e 2nd. Why did you think the 2nd period would be the difference maker?
Ok, so what was the reference to the 2nd period all about?I have a niece on the Bowdoin Team so I have been keeping an eye on them for the last 3 years!