Looking over their schedule, which games that they lost should they have won? The UNH game was a disappointment, but those things happen (we were ahead of BU 6-2 in the 2nd before the unthinkable happened). They went to Michigan State on their homecoming weekend and earned a tie. They beat North Dakota twice. They've beaten BC, won @PC and @Vermont and tied @BU and @Northeastern. They lost @Merrimack. So did BC and BU (the Warriors went 2-1 vs BC and 1-0-2 against BU, winning both season series). Merrimack's for real, folks, it wasn't a fluke. Their only conference losses are @MC, UNH and the sweep at BC. It isn't like they've lost to the Sisters of the Poor here.
The schedule so far:
UML
UConn
@MSU, @MSU
ND, ND
@UVM
@BU
NE,NE
@BC, @BC
@PC, @PC
NH
UMA
vs Miami
vs Cornell
@MC
PC
BC
@NE
They have 11 wins and five ties. Look over that schedule and tell me where the extra wins are. When the season started, you predicted they would win @MSU or @BC? Really? You thought they'd do better than their usual 1-1 in Florida? Who predicted they'd go to the Gutt and win? Who thought they'd go to Agannis and get a tie? And of course all you optimists predicted they'd sweep the Sioux.
Read this thread and you'd never guess that they are winning over 60% of their games and recently knocked off the #2 team in the country. But then again, people were complaining when this team was making annual trips to the Frozen Four, so it's not a surprise that people are complaining now.